Source : centralbussinessdistrict.com.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has issued Prohibition Orders (“POs”) against three traders who were earlier convicted of insider trading.
The authority banned Mr E Seck Peng Simon, former representative of UOB Kay Hian Pte Ltd, and Mr Leong Chee Wai, former representative of First State Investments (Singapore), from the activity for 15 years. While Mr Toh Chew Leong, former representative of First State Investments (Singapore), got 13 years PO.
All three POs took effect from 13 August 2019, the authority added.
MAS also said that Mr E, Mr Leong and Mr Toh are prohibited from performing any regulated activity under the Securities and Futures Act (SFA). They are also prohibited from taking part in the management, acting as a director or becoming a substantial shareholder of any capital markets services firm under the SFA.
The authority said that the three individuals had engaged in a front-running arrangement over a period of 7 years and colluded to misuse confidential information obtained in the course of their work for personal gain. They were representatives of Capital Markets Services Licence holders when they committed the offences.
In July 2019, Mr Leong, Mr E and Mr Toh were convicted of insider trading offences and sentenced to 36 months, 30 months and 20 months imprisonment respectively. They were charged with a total of 333 counts of insider trading offences resulting in profits of S$8.07 million.
The State Court also ordered that the sums of approximately S$310,000, S$770,000 and S$1,350,000 be forfeited to the State from Mr Leong, Mr E and Mr Toh respectively. These monies, suspected to be criminal proceeds, were seized from the individuals in the course of investigations.

Mr Leong and Mr Toh were senior equity dealers with First State Investments (Singapore) (FSIS), where they were tasked to execute trading orders placed by FSIS’ portfolio managers.  Mr E was a remisier with UOB Kay Hian Pte Ltd (UOBKH).
Starting from March 2007, Mr Leong and Mr E colluded to profit from the price-sensitive confidential information that Mr Leong received on intended orders by FSIS. Under this arrangement, Mr Leong informed Mr E about FSIS’ intended orders and Mr E used his personal trading account to place orders in the same counters, ahead of FSIS’ orders, thus front-running FSIS’ orders.
As FSIS’ orders typically involved large quantities of shares, the orders had a significant price impact on the market. When FSIS’ orders generated favourable price movements, Mr E unwound his position by trading in the opposite direction of FSIS’ orders, which led to insider trading profits which were split equally between Mr Leong and Mr E.
Mr Toh joined FSIS’ dealing desk in July 2004 and subsequently joined Mr Leong and Mr E in the front-running arrangement from August 2008.  The profits generated from the insider trading were then split equally among the three of them.
Under the front-running arrangement, Mr Leong and Mr E made profits of about S$2,685,625 each, while Mr Toh made a profit of about S$2,365,040, from the trades in 100 counters listed on the SGX-ST and in overseas countries including Hong Kong and Australia.
In addition, Mr Toh and Mr E separately used the information on FSIS’ intended orders to trade in a contract for differences (CFDs) on the counters that FSIS was intending to trade-in. The CFDs trades were carried out in their own trading accounts and the profits from these trades were not shared with others.  Mr Toh made insider trading profits of about S$273,398 and Mr E, S$59,492.
The investigations conducted by MAS arose from a referral by the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Ltd (SGX-ST).

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

50 firefighters and seven water jets put out massive vegetation fire in Marina East

An area the size of two football fields were aflame on Monday…

US tax rule changes and implications for Singapore: the Prisoner’s Dilemma

S’pore needs to encourage growth of domestically owned companies that can replace the foreign investors who may relocate. Kenneth Jeyaretnam.

公积金局称申诉老翁已领出14万 网民非议当局公开会员财务个资

七旬私召车司机申诉,自己每月只能从公积金领取575元,无法负担自己和妻子的生活。但开私召车,又被要求要填补保健储蓄。对此公积金局在昨日在脸书发声明,这名司机在55岁时已领出14万元,更指如果当初他没领钱,每月领入息可超过1千元。 然而,公积金局的答复仍引来网民非议,有者质疑当局公开会员的财务私隐是否妥当?再者,这名司机质问的重点是,为何保健储蓄已有钱还要填补,否则将无法更新私召车执照? 事缘上月24日,名为克里福德(Clifford Theseira)的72岁私召车司机申诉,自己的公积金储蓄只能每月领入息575新元,由于不足以承担夫妻俩生活费用,自己只好开私召车营生,不过上了年纪又不能开太久,实则收入有限。 他提到自己的保健储蓄(medisave)户头还有6万元,可是仍被要求要填补保健储蓄保费,而来自公积金局的信函也提到,若不填补将无法更新私召车司机执照。 “(保健储蓄)里我有6万元,如果我在这笔钱动用前离世,我的钱会怎样?我自己的钱为何我不能用。 如果我的执照吊销了,我能不能申领福利?哎呀,这里是新加坡,是没有免费的。” 公积金局公开克里福德公积金个资 对此,公积金局在昨日的脸书贴文声称克里福德“未反映事实的全部”,指他在55岁那年已领出14万元,如果当初没这么做,如今他每月领入息能超过千元。 “再者,克里福德还联名拥有一座已还清的五房式组屋”。 公积金局称当事人可以透过财路(GIRO)分期填补自己的保健储蓄户头,每月缴付额估计不超过月入的1巴仙。“只要他和其他雇员一样缴交,他仍能在明年7月到期前更新执照。” 公积金局更扬言,克里福德作为建国一代,已经从政府度援助措施受惠。仅在今年就已收到保健储蓄补贴和终身健保的特别保费津贴,也获取超过2300元包括现金和公积金在内的就业入息补助。…

学生揭使用异性厕所 犯错两次才被赶出国大宿舍

国大宿舍偷拍事件曝光至今,学生家长和社会群众对于涉事男生获得的惩处,表达质疑和不满,认为对受害者不公。 国大方面在23日向国大校友发函致歉,坦言在女学生马芸在宿舍被偷拍风波中,一开始没给予女生足够协助;至于教育部长王乙康也曾批评,国大对涉及此事件的男生所采取的处分“明显不足”。 王乙康认为,两次犯错才受罚,不能成为标准的处理方式。国大必须确保所有学生在校园的安全,尤其对女学生。 至于警方在前日的文告阐述对偷拍事件的立场,称起诉涉事者需考量其他因素,警方的做法和对其他案件采取的做法“一致”,因为警察部队曾针对类似案件发出了这种有条件警告。 也有不愿具名的学生,向媒体透露国大校方宿舍的规矩和条例。 其中可见使用异性厕所和在宿舍内抽烟喝酒的处罚,都同样是被逮到两次才被赶出宿舍,即表示还有重犯机会,令学生表示难以接受,希望校方检讨修正。 本社也查询了国大尤索夫宿舍舍规,2019年4月24日的最新版本,违例项目共多达30项,分为四种等级。 每名学生都有总分16分,每次犯错都会减分,没分数了就得搬离宿舍。最严重的过错有六项,即偷窃、破坏公物、非礼、偷窥、转租宿舍给外人和高楼抛物等。一旦犯下这六项过错,学生必须搬出宿舍。 此等严重的过错多达10项,都是重犯就必须搬离宿舍,其中包括利用异性厕所、抽烟、故意启动火警、复制钥匙、喝酒等。 但这名爆料学生就感到不妥了,不了解使用异性厕所这一条例,为何还给予重犯的机会。“这里写的是使用,不是不小心进错。” 他质疑到底人们要在怎样的情况下,才会一再地使用异性厕所,难道会不带任何犯罪企图地进入异性厕所?“是不是没有被发现犯下罪行就算没事?” 他表示,唯一能想到进入异性厕所而不算犯罪的情况,就是学生情侣在厕所内乱搞,但是这也会影响其他的厕所使用者。…