Based on a new study by Kisi – a keyless access technology company – released on Wednesday (7 August), it was found that Singapore performed badly when it comes to work-life balance as it placed in the bottom quarter of 40 cities.
The city-state took the 32nd spot, although it is still placed higher than other selected Asian countries like Hong Kong, Tokyo and Kuala Lumpur.
This is mainly due to the high amount of time Singaporeans dedicate to their jobs.
If that is not all, Singapore was also placed second for top overworked cities, which included factors like vacation days taken, paid maternal and parental leave as well as the amount of full-time employees working more than 48 hours per working week.
The study titled “Cities for the Best Work-Life Balance 2019” revealed a ranking of cities based on their success in promoting work-life balance to their citizens by comparing data on work intensity, institutional support, legislation and livability.
Upon gathering the results, the cities that scored really well and topped the chart for overall work-life balance were Helsinki, Munich and Oslo. On the other hand, Kuala Lumpur, Tokyo and Buenos Aires took the bottom three spots.
In terms of how these 40 cities were picked, Kisi said all these cities were included because they’re known to attract professionals and families for their work opportunities and diverse lifestyles offerings.
After the selection, the cities were then given a score based on 20 factors. Apart from work intensity factors, other points considered were related to society and institution, like gender equality and access to mental healthcare, as well as city livability factors such as safety, air pollutants and outdoor spaces.
As for how the data was gathered, it was taken from different sources including government and international organisation databases, other published indexes and companies like Expedia and USB,
Kisi chief executive Bernhard Mehl expressed that he hopes the results of the study will emphasise the need to do more research into taking care the well-being of citizens in order to curb the psychological and economic costs of workplace stress.
“Despite living in an era where unprecedented advancements have been made in technology and connectivity, we have failed to address the most everyday aspect of enhancing our everyday lives-finding the balance between work and leisure,” he noted.
Even though Singapore ranked poorly in terms of work intensity and how society and institution support individual wellness, but the city-state managed to take the 11th place when it comes to city liveability. This is because the study found that it has low levels of air pollution, high levels of safety and good general wellness and fitness.
In addition, other findings that comprised in the study include arrival times at work, with employees in Washington D.C. and Hong Kong starting at the latest time of 10.30am while people in San Diego start earliest at 8.09am. As for Singapore, the study found that workers generally clock in at 9.34am on average.
Kisi highlighted that the index does not mean to be a city liveability index or emphasise the best cities to work in. In fact, it looks at providing a guideline “for cities to benchmark their ability to support the fulfilment of residents’ lives by improving the aspects of life that help relieve work-related stress and intensity”.
After reading the results gathered in the study, many netizens voiced their disapproval towards the findings. Commenting on ST’s Facebook page, many of them rubbished the study’s explanation that says that Singaporeans don’t have a work-life balance because they’re dedicated to their jobs. Instead, they said that they’re actually forced to be at work longer.



Others say that there is no such things as work-life balance as they all have to work longer in order to survive in the country due to the high cost of living. Some said that if they request to leave work early, then they might lose their job and end up being unemployed or work as a Grab driver. A few also said that they have to work overtime (OT), which removes their chance of having a work-life balance, and if they refuse to do OT, then they may lose their jobs and have no means to survive in this highly-competitive country.

  

A bunch even said that the working condition in Singapore is so bad that many end up feeling like slaves because no matter how hard they work, their living standards don’t seem to improve due to inflation and other “ridiculous taxes that the government is intending to add”. This means that they will have to slog throughout their lives.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Aesthetic clinic staff told female customer to ‘get out’ over alleged abusive behavior

A dispute at ClearSK aesthetic clinic turned into a heated argument, captured in a viral video. A staff member yelled at a female customer, accusing her of extortion. The customer later left a negative Google review, while the clinic maintained she caused a disturbance for nearly an hour.

减低云顶大马亏损 林国泰自愿减薪20巴仙

由于赌场税务增加,影响盈利表现,云顶大马(GeM,4715,主办消费股)首席执行员丹斯里林国泰,昨日在股东大会上宣布,自愿减薪20巴仙! 一名昨日出席有关股东大会的云顶大马股东透露林国泰的决定后,更表示对此感到欣喜。 据证券监督委员会于今年发布的地2019年企业治理监督报告显示,依据2017年的资料来计算,林国泰出任云顶(Genting,3182,主办消费股)主席兼首席执行员,加上掌管云顶大马所获得的酬劳超过了2亿令吉,是马来西亚去年最高薪酬的上市公司首席执行员。 而根据2018年最新的公司年报显示,林国泰在云顶大马的总薪酬已增至9388万令吉(约3071万新元),其中包括薪金和花红的5018万令吉(约1641新元),和公积金、股票酬劳及其它福利的4350万令吉(1423万新元)。若按照他所说,减薪20巴仙,就等于从9388万令吉中减去了1004万令吉(328万新元)。 云顶大马受到上调赌场税和拨备建设户外主题乐园的影响,截止今年3月31日的财政年首季业绩显示,净利按年获得2亿6829万令吉,与去年同期的3亿5824万令吉相比萎缩了25.11巴仙。营业额则比去年同期的23亿9950万令吉增加了14巴仙,获得27亿3558万令吉。 该名股东指出,户外主题公园目前所面对的官司尚未了结,但是董事局还是希望其尽快完结,以便能够预期于明年开业。 在询及是否会寻找合作伙伴时,云顶大马表示很可能自行营运有关的主题乐园,但是不排除合作可能。 市场期待再传减薪消息 另外,云顶大马母公司,云顶将于今天召开股东大会,市场也开始期待林国泰是否会再次宣布减薪。 据2018年年报显示,他在云顶的总薪酬分别有1亿2727万令吉(约4163万新元)的薪金和花红,5580万令吉(约1825万新元)的公积金、股票酬劳及其他福利,总额高达1亿8307万令吉(约5989万新元)。若他同样宣布减薪20巴仙,就表示从薪酬1亿2727万中,减去2545万令吉(约832万新元)。

Netizens point out the irony of PM Lee telling world leaders to 'resolve differences calmly and peacefully'

We should try our best to resolve our differences calmly and peacefully,…

Videos – speeches from the rallies

The first day of the General Election proper saw the various political…