It was reported that a recent job advertisement placed by the Istana looking for butlers and junior chefs has caused much controversy in social media (‘Istana offering lowball salaries for its butlers and cooks?‘).
The Istana has offered S$1,400 to S$2,000 for the butler positions and S$2000 to S$2,500 for junior chef positions. Netizens have questioned about the offered pay and asked if it is enough to survive and care for his or her family in Singapore.
Even the market pays better than what Istana is offering. According to last year’s median gross wage statistics by the Ministry of Manpower, the median gross income of waiters is S$1,838 while a captain waiter or waiter supervisor gets S$2,700. And the median gross salary for a chef is S$3,532.
Meanwhile, the current monthly gross salary of President Halimah is about S$120,000 (her annual salary in 2018 was S$1,738,550, including bonuses).
US White House’s assistant chefs paid more while its President gets less
In any case, the reverse situation seems to be true at the White House in the US compared to the Istana in Singapore.
Data based on about 20 profiles of sous chefs (assistant chefs) working at the White House shows that their average salary is US$66,801 a year.

The executive chef or the head chef of White House would earn somewhere between US$80,000 and US$100,000 a year.
And of course, the US President only earns US$400,000 a year as mandated by US law.
Hence, the salary ratio of US President to a White House’s sous chef would work out to be about 6 times on average.
In the case of Singapore, using their monthly salary to calculate, the salary ratio of President Halimah to an Istana’s assistant chef would be 48 times.
Meanwhile, President Halimah only makes decisions based on advice from the cabinet and her presidential advisors while the US President would make decisions of his own. Such as how the current US President, Donald Trump is currently doing with his means of battling huge influx of illegal immigrants trying to enter the US from South America and dealing with potential conflict with Iran in the Straits of Hormuz – whether right or wrong.
It seems President Halimah has an easier job to do when compared with what President Trump is currently doing. She even has time to go inaugurate a new ‘Milo Gao Kosong’ beverage by being the first to drink the official cup of ‘Milo Gao Kosong’ at Plaza Singapura in Oct last year.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Mdm Halimah Yacob's speech gets lambasted by netizens for character assassination

Last night at the People’s Action Party’s election rally for the Bukit…

工人党吁更平等、透明和全面护保政策

本月10日,多位朝野议员针对终身护保政策,对男女保费不同、伤残索赔标准的定义,以及终身护保如何与其他社会援助相辅相成,给予公民更全面保障,进行辩论。 工人党非选区议员吴佩松助理教授关注终身护保,女性保费比男性高25巴仙的问题,他和里昂佩雷拉议员都发现,男性保费为206元,但是同龄30岁的女性,就必须付253元。 似乎女性因为一些他们无法控制的因素:身为女人,而不是基于他们生活素质和风险,来衡量他们该付多少保费。“终身护保是普世性的社会保障,但为何有男女差别待遇?” 国会卫生委员会主席谢世儒医生认为,新加坡女性的保健储蓄一般比男性低,他建议女性应在保费上获得补贴。 卫生高级部长许连碹解释,女性保费较高,是基于女性寿命较长,”在2017年,女性平均寿命约为85.2岁,相比下男性80.7岁。在2009、2011和2012年针对乐龄人士的调查,研究者预计60岁女性有7.8年的时间,在生活起居需要额外看护,而男性只有2.6年。”   对此,他估计女性面临严重残疾,依赖终身护保赔付的时间会更长。 阿裕尼集选区议员陈硕茂则呼吁,制定较多元的伤残看护选择和更有效地政策,作为终身护保的辅助。 目前,乐龄健保给付为每月400元,而终身护保暂定起始赔付为每月600元,但是能获得多达程度的长期护理,也要纳入:家庭看护、外籍女佣、床位、日股中心等额外的护理选择和成本的考量。   他欢迎“共同分担风险”的机制,工党也了解各阶层年龄、不同健康状况的国民,对于长期护理的需求日益增长。

Maid arrested after CCTV footage captures her dipping a toddler’s hand into a boiling pot

The police have arrested a foreign domestic worker for scalding a 16-month-old…