By Leong Sze Hian
Why is it that most people lose money investing? Is it because of people’s misconceptions about risk?
But before I get to answering this question, let me touch on how many people make or lose money investing.
To the best of my knowledge, there are no statistics on this. No, I am not trolling you. However we used to have the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS) cumulative profits and losses’ statistics up till the 11th year, after the CPFIS started in 1993.
It was a 75 per cent of investors who did not beat the 2.5 per cent return on the Ordinary Account after the 11 years. As for Singapore stock investors, the average loss was about 35 per cent, after the 11 years.
success
Lower risk assets?
So getting back to answer the original question. Why is it that most people lose money investing?
Let me start by asking another question on top of that question. Is there such a thing as lower risk in the different asset classes such as equities, bonds, cash, commodities, property, etc?
Of course there is. After all isn’t this what every textbook and what you read in the media always tell you?
So, imagine yourself walking into a financial institution and you say that you want a lower risk investment. It is most likely you would be shown the merits of investing in bonds, because they are of lower risk.
But are “Bonds” of a lower risk?
Before you decide to accept the conventional notion that bonds are “lower risk” – read the following:
Real loss of 91% in 35 years?
According to the article “Events in America show that no asset is copper-bottomed“ (The Economist, Oct 13)
“From the point of view of a creditor, however, the ability of a government to print money is of little comfort if the result is higher inflation (for domestic investors) or currency depreciation (for foreign ones). Investors who bought Treasury bonds in 1946, when yields were around current levels, did not suffer a formal default. But over the following 35 years they lost money in real terms at a rate of 2% a year. The cumulative real loss was 91%. By that standard, Greek creditors, who recently suffered a 50% loss via default, were lucky.”
After reading the above, you may be asking yourself – How come nobody ever told me about the risks of investing in bonds? – other than the fact that when a bond defaults, it may mean the total loss of your bond investment but the entire or geographical or sectoral bonds may be quite risky too?
Reducing risk
So, how then do we reduce risk? Well, arguably, the only way is by diversification by having different asset classes, geographical, sectoral, active/index fund managers’ diversification, etc.
In other words,  taking for example, a globally diversified portfolio of about 10 funds of approximately 30 per cent equities (developed, emerging markets, region, country, sector, big cap/small cap, etc), 30 per cent bonds (global, regional, emerging markets, etc), 20 per cent commodities, 20 per cent property (global).
In this connection, I understand that in the United States, if you are a trustee or an endowment fund, etc – you are required to have at least 20 per cent in equities – to “reduce risk”. This is also evident in the investment fiduciary guidelines of the Centre for Fiduciary Studies.
What question to ask before you invest?
Finally, don’t forget to ask no matter what you are considering to invest in – What is the worst thing that can happen? What is the worst historically event that has happened?
Statistics on clients’ accounts?
There was a conference whereby I was on a panel with regulators from different countries and I asked “I believe most financial institutions may have the data and statistics as to how many and what percentage of their clients have made or lost money, and by how much over different time periods. Why don’t they disclose this? It may help investors to make better decisions”
The answer from the panelists was basically that it would be a great marketing opportunity for the first financial institution to do that!
From this answer – perhaps give us a clue as to what the time-tested advice in buying anything may have always been – ask those you trust to recommend who or what to buy from – because there may arguably be no better guide than past experience on advice, service and performance.
Asking the wrong questions?
Having said the above – the irony in my view as to the most common reason why people lose money investing is … at every forum, meeting or interview -people are always focusing their questions on the returns – Which is the best investment? When is the best time to invest? etc, etc.
The truth is … nobody knows … we are all making guesses probably all the time!
Therefore, diversify, diversify, diversify … and sell those that have gone up the most when you need money, or at regular intervals such as when you are in retirement. And also avoid investment vehicles or products that are not regulated – remember the millions that people have lost investing in “gold guarantees”, multi-level marketing (MLM), etc, that turned out to be scams.
So beware! – whatever contract you have is only as good as if you are able to find or seek legal redress from the the company that gave you the  contract for your investment in the first place!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工人党中期目标 毕丹星:拿下三分一议席

工人党秘书长毕丹星表示,该党中期目标乃是拿下国会三分之一议席。 他认为依据过去的经验,工人党能吸引合适和符合资格的候选人迎战大选,这对作为小政党的工人党来说,是很高的目标。 他说,工人党已迈入62载,然在八年前才在集选区取得突破,2015年虽保住议席却仅获微差优势。 “考虑到阿裕尼的边际票数,我们在国会只不过是站住脚跟。”他坦言选举全军覆没的风险确实存在,到时又该何去何从? 工人党在本月13日,举办主题为“一个工人党”(One WP)的党员论坛。论坛收集党员反馈,并分成两大主题,讨论该当的内部发展,以及对外和国家及国人的互动关系。 毕丹星指出,十年前加入工人党,是为了监督行动党“不开空头支票”,也和换政府的意念无关,同时不认为必须成为“白衣人”才能为民服务。当时,工人党还只有两名国会议员。 他说,在全球其他国家,组织政党的目的,就是为了能组成政府,来制定对国家的政策。 毕丹星表示,在当上议员后的经验,令他深信,不论是任何政党执政,新加坡有必要朝向反对党需掌握三分一的多元化议会愿景前进。 对此,他定下了工人党应拿下国会三分一议席的中期目标。 选民一票打造平衡代表议会 毕丹星提醒,鉴于行动党仍通过掌控基层组织来捍卫执政地位,朝野之间仍在不平衡的态势下竞争,行动党在国会的人数优势,也使之有能力修改宪法。…

All required info given in accordance with tender: Life Corp

In an announcement to the Australian Securities Exchange on 2 February, Life…

Hong Kong withstand contract with CSR Qingdao Sifang for 93 urban trains despite public furor

MTR Corp managing director Kam Chak-pui announced on July 13 that the…