Singapore Business Review (SBR) published an article last Mon (‘Singapore’s foreign workers left in limbo amidst tighter manpower rules‘, 4 Mar) highlighting that foreigners working in Singapore are “left in limbo” after the recent announcement by the Singapore government to cut work pass quota.

During the recent budget debate, Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat announced a cut in the foreign worker quota in the services sector, after noting that growth in S-pass services holders hit a five-year high last year.

“The foreign workers in Singapore’s services sector face heightened risk of losing their jobs after finance minister Heng Swee Keat announced in his budget address that the government will be reducing the dependency ratio ceiling (DRC) for the services sector from the current 40% to 38% by January 1, 2020 and to 35% in January 1, 2021,” SBR wrote.

“The S Pass sub-DRC for the services sector has also been tightened from the current 15% to 13% on Jan 1, 2020, and to 10% from Jan 1, 2021.”

The Singapore government is also actively promoting the use of technologies in industries so that companies would depend less on foreign manpower. In the meantime, technologies would help boost productivity.

Filipino on S-Pass: We are humans who have families to support

SBR interviewed one of the foreign workers on S-Pass, Jean, who came to Singapore ten years ago and now “works at a popular supermarket chain to support her family in the Philippines”.

“I heard that they were cutting down the number of foreign workers. Of course, we’re worried because there is a possibility that we could get cut. We worry constantly because they have been tightening since 2008,” she spoke to SBR in Filipino in an interview.

There are an estimated 180,000 Filipinos working in Singapore currently.

SBR said that foreign workers like Jean lose out as they remain in limbo about how longer they can still stay and work in Singapore.

Jean told SBR she hopes that the Singapore government would start to value the contributions of foreign workers like herself to Singapore’s prosperity, after she applied for PR twice and was rejected on both counts.

“I am very grateful to Singapore as the host country but I hope that they will do more for the foreign workers who help build Singapore,” she said.

“We are not just workers but we are humans who have families to support. What will become of us after the host country cuts our jobs after we have served for 10 to 20 years? We can go home to the Philippines, but then who will hire us when we are already in our late 30s and 40s?”

It’s strange that Jean is asking the Singapore government for help to get jobs instead of her own Philippines government.

Singapore PMET: Hiring companies not helping locals

Meanwhile, in an interview with Transitioning.org, a support site for the unemployed Singaporeans, a 38-year-old PMET local named Philip who recently lost his job as Deputy Contact Centre Manager felt that companies are not doing enough to hire locals.

“I have a couple of interviews since Dec 2018 and also Jan 2019. As there were many people looking for similar roles, companies have more choices to choose from, therefore chances of being reemployed is lower,” he said.

“Companies are not willing to pay for a local with the same amount of experience as a foreign talent. I do understand that fresh grads are targeting to have a starting salary of $3000 and above without relevant experience, whereas they can get a FT with more experience at the same package.”

“It is the hiring companies that’s not helping local Singaporeans,” he said, adding that living expenses have gone up but salary hasn’t.

“I do feel that this (foreign influx) needs to be controlled. Singaporean PMETs need to be given a chance to learn and climb the corporate ladder.”

It’s a common knowledge that if a company has a foreigner in-charge of HR, he or she would tend to favor their “own kind”.

And in the case of Employment Passes, there is no quota for companies and there have been cases where companies overstate the pay for the workers in order for them to qualify for EP.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

COVID-19: Defence Minister says Government will try to minimise retrenchments due to virus outbreak

On Friday (14 February), Singapore’s Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen assured the…

Pay for Performance

~by: Tan Kin Lian~ I wish to add my views to the…

93万户组屋将获 60元至100元水电费回扣

约93万户组屋即将在本月获得60元至100元的水电费回扣,以抵消他们部分的水电费。 水电费回扣,属于消费税补助券之一,每个三月发放一次,以此协助家庭抵消部分水电费,降低开支。 文告表示,将根据不同房型,获得不同价格的回扣,如一房式或两房式单位将获得100元水电费补助、三房式则会有90元补助,四房式则是80元,五房式则有70元,三代同堂或其他大型组屋则享有60元回扣。 若其房地产超过一个将无法享有水电费回扣。 日前,新加坡能源公司宣布,家庭电价将上调至3.5巴仙,即每千瓦0.81元。 举例而言,住在一房式的家庭,每月平均账单可增加1.02元,而五房式也可能会出现上涨3.20元的电费,形成最新电价自2014年以来,达到最高水平。 此外,城市煤气周一也宣布,今年第一季度,家庭天然气价格将调整至4.22巴仙,即每千瓦0.76元。 政府也推出水电费回扣(U-Save)协助民众抵消水电费。据报道,政府为水电费回扣拨出的总开支,今年预计达3亿元。 文告也指出,水电费回扣相当重要,至少能够帮助一房式或二房式单位的居民抵消平均三至四个月的水电费;而三房式和四房式的居民则可以抵消一至两个月的水电费。

凯发投资者本周六下午三点 齐聚芳林公园抗议

凯发(Hyflux)的永久证券和优先股投资者,将在本周六(30日)下午三点至四点,齐聚芳林公园演说角落进行抗议,反对凯发的债务重组计划以及公用事业局以零元收购大泉海水淡化厂。 一名自称是“Alex Leong”(梁先生)的43岁召集人,昨日电邮通知包括《亚洲新闻台》等媒体,指出此前投资者就曾有进行抗议的念头,不过未有下文,故此自己就抛砖引玉发起号召。 他也附上来自警方和国家公园局批准的场地准证。 梁先生称自己于2011年,在凯发筹资活动时投资了10万元在的优先股,也把所有所得红利都重新投资在凯发身上。 但是凯发“白武士”SM Investment(SMI)献议的重组计划,如果在4月5日的各组债权人表决中获得通过,可能让他97巴仙投资化为乌有。 凯发“白武士”— 印尼财团SM Investment(SMI),透过注资超过五亿3000万元,换取凯发的60巴仙股权。但散户认为,SMI集团只不过是要得到凯发的资产。 公用事业局在上周表明,若凯发集团无法在期限内解决大泉水电厂购水协议的所有违约问题,将终止购水协议,接管海水淡化厂。 公用局表示,收购大泉水电厂的价格将根据购水协议,由独立估价师评估。目前,该厂的估值为负值,即便完成收购,可能还要赔偿公用局。不过,公用局已表明,可以零元收购淡水厂并免除掉赔偿。…