Photo Credit: Miss Tam Chiak

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said on Monday (14 January) that the food and beverage behind famous restaurant chain Penang Culture has been fined S$94,500 for falsely declaring salaries in work pass applications.

On 27 December 2018, GD Group was convicted of seven charges under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act, with another 13 taken into consideration during sentencing.

In addition, MOM has also barred the company from hiring foreign employees, it mentioned in its statement.

Investigations found out that GD Group bypassed foreign worker quota rules by hiring foreigners on employment passes, but paying them way lesser than the salaries declared in the work pass applications.

Between February 2013 and July 2015, the company wrongly declared salary amounts of between S$4,000 and S$4,800 for 20 foreign employees to meet the salary requirement for employment passes.

However, the foreigners were only paid between S$1,500 and S$2,200.

GD Group is the owner of Penang Culture, which is known as the first Penang-themed halal restaurant chain in Singapore. It also has a catering arm that offers live food stations at events.

“GD Group had gained an unfair advantage in hiring foreigners at the expense of other firms,” said Kandhavel Periyasamy, MOM’s foreign manpower management division director of employment inspectorate.

He added that the ministry has a duty to protect the interest of law-abiding employers and they will continue to take strict actions against delinquent employers to uphold the integrity of work pass controls.

Under the Employment Manpower Act, those who are found guilty of making false declarations may be fined up to S$20,000 per charge, jailed for up to two years or both. On top of that, these offenders will also be barred from employing new foreign workers or renewing the permits of their existing foreign workers.

Upon reading this news, the majority of netizens feel that GD Group is just one of the many companies in Singapore that is falsely declaring salaries for employment passes.

The fact that netizens think that this case is just the “tip of the iceberg” is not wrong at all.

In 2016, the Executive Director of local fashion house, Yen’s Studio Pte Ltd, Yen Ser Ming, was sentenced to a fine of S$72, 000 in default 18 months imprisonment and the company was barred from hiring any foreign workers. She pleaded guilty to 9 charges for submitting a falsely declaration relating to the company’s foreign employees’ salaries in a work pass application.

In a separate case, Tan Boon Sing, the owner of KT Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd was sentenced in the State Courts in 2016 for falsely declaring salaries to obtain foreign employees. He was fined S$21,000 in default nine weeks’ imprisonment for three charges, with the remaining seven charges taken into consideration.

As such, the case with GD Group is not an isolated one, and it had been happening for years and is still happening.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Sister of death row inmate – “Are you helping good people or bad people?”

Kirsten Han / The family of a Malaysian man sentenced to death…

Reminder: Check your voter status online at Elections Department website

Following the release of the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) report on…

NSP expresses concerns about Sands’ links to criminal gangs

Press release from the National Solidarity Party. Concerns on the Casino License…

网红Nas Daily直指民主无法凑效 因投票者以个人情绪投票

今年四月旅居我国的知名网红“Nas Daily”亚新(Nuseir Yassin)近日发布最新视频,直指“大部分投票者并不了解如何投票,导致民主无法起到改变的作用。” 亚新认为目前的民主制度并不是最完善的,他说一直以来他认为“一人一票,改变政府”会将国家领向更好的未来,但现在他认为这样的想法存有漏洞。 他将投票者比喻为搭乘飞机的乘客,描绘如今的投票者是以个人情绪为判断,而且缺乏判断的知识。 他表示,“假设你今天要搭乘飞机,你和其他乘客必须以民主的方式筛选机长,而目前的候选人有两位。第一位候选人发表其政论:如果当选机长,会遵循航空法,带领各位乘客飞向3万英尺高空;第二位候选人则表示,如果当选机长,他会让乘客乘坐商务舱。而今,大部分人都容易被个人情绪主导,并在欠缺多元资讯和知识下作选择,自然而然地,他们会选择投向给予商务舱的人。 亚新断言,“民主将会判决一位不懂得驾乘飞机的机长当选,最终走向毁灭。” 民主失败是因为媒体与公民组织被打压 但亚新则没有特别强调的是,“机长”可以向乘客吹嘘的他想要表达的内容,如果“机长”没有特别向乘客吹嘘自己能给出什么,乘客也不会知道会得到什么。 这也是为什么“乘客”需要依赖如媒体的专业机构,针对“机长”的内容进行核对。如果专业机构能够根据“机长”的背景或飞行记录作调查,乘客也能从中获得资讯,随即踢爆“机长”荒谬的承诺。 这是亚新只字未提的重点:一个民主的运作,是仰赖具备知识和辨识能力的人民,为选出最好的候选人投票。反之,一个民主的失败则是因为媒体与公民组织被打压。 亚新在视频也提及另一个重点:当作许多课题和问题如关税、核武器、地缘政治、医疗保健、边界等都需要长时间和“真正的专家”解决。同样地,他沿用飞机的比喻表示,一个政府的经营就如同当上飞机师,会经历各种困难和累积多年的飞行经验。…