Source : Google map.

A member of the public, Mr Chow Keng Kwok, wrote to ST Forum last month (26 Feb) complaining about Changi General Hospital (CGH) on 2 issues.

Mr Chow’s maid was recently admitted to CGH for surgery. At admission, he was quoted an estimated charge of $15,000 to $18,000 for a five-day stay in a Class C ward. In the end, the final bill was $2,930.70 for two days of hospitalisation.

Mr Chow could not understand why the estimated cost was so far from the final cost. He asked, “What is the point of giving an estimated cost that is up to six times higher than the actual cost?”

“A patient unable to afford the estimated cost may be discouraged from seeking treatment,” he added.

Also, among the charges, he noted that CGH had charged him $100 for a medical report completed by a doctor in a template required by NTUC Income.

“Given that there is already an inpatient discharge form which clearly states the medical condition and procedures administered to the patient, why do insurance companies still require a separate medical report to be completed by a doctor?” he asked.

“How can the hospital charge $100 for what seems like the relatively simple task of completing a medical report? To put things in perspective, a specialist consultation can cost less than $100.”

He wanted the government to control the amounts charged by public hospitals for completing such reports.

$100 cover “administrative costs” and “professional services” rendered

Today (11 Mar), the CFO of CGH, Lim Lee Nor, replied.

He said that the estimated bill was based on the range of historical bill sizes for patients requiring surgery with the same residency status.

“As the surgery was less complex and required a much shorter stay, the final bill was lower than initially expected,” Mr Lim said.

“Mr Chow expressed concerns that a patient who is unable to afford the estimated cost may be discouraged from pursuing treatment. We assure Mr Chow that there are various healthcare financing schemes and subsidies available for Singaporeans,” he added.

With regard to the charges for medical reports, Mr Lim said these cover the “administrative costs” and “professional services of the doctor” to review the patient’s medical records and customise the report based on the purpose of the request.

“Patients who require only basic information, such as admission date and reason for admission, can request a copy of the discharge summary at no cost. We apologise for any inconvenience caused,” he replied.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tung Lok Millennium Pte Ltd suspension to be lifted after meeting required standards of NEA

The suspension on Tung Lok Millennium Pte Ltd at 1 Expo Drive…

Hong Kong shopping mall owned by Temasek-linked company suffers "extensive damage" by protesters

Festival Walk, a shopping mall in Hong Kong owned by Singapore-based Mapletree…

雇佣未公平考量国人 杨莉明称雇主将面对更严厉惩处

人力部长杨莉明声称,那些在雇佣雇员时未公平考量或歧视本地人的雇主,在新近更新的公平考量框架(FCF)将面对更严重惩处。 若在招揽员工时未公平考量本地人,雇主将被禁止雇佣外籍员工至少一年,较严重案例还可把禁令延长至两年;被禁期间也不能为现有外籍员工更新就业准证。 有关公平考量框架的更新措施在本月生效,杨莉明认为这些举措将对于那些顽固雇主起到较强烈的震慑作用。 她是在今日(14日)出席Salesforce平台专业人士转业计划毕业典礼上,这么表示。 杨莉明称大部分公司都已理解何谓公平雇佣,而严厉举措则是针对那些仍以为公平考量框架只是“纸上谈兵”的顽固雇主。 至于那些在为雇员申请就业准证涉嫌虚报资料的雇主,也可能被提控。 在雇用外来人力法令下,若雇主谎报资料,可面对监禁两年,或最高2万元罚款,或两者兼施。 在公平考量框架下,要求雇主为那些月薪1万5000元以下的工作,须在职业库(Jobs Bank)刊登求职广告,为期两周。

PIE高架桥惨剧引以为戒! 林瑞莲质询当局吁保障公共安全

有鉴于2017年曾发生泛岛快速公路(PIE)施工高架桥倒塌的惨剧,工人党主席暨阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,在国会质询当局对于建筑项目的规划,是否应扮演更多的管制角色,侦测和弥补漏洞,以保障公共安全。 林瑞莲是在本周三(4日)的国家发展部财案预算辩论,询问新加坡建设局(BCA)是否有检查和核实,那些项目工程所聘用的合格人员(QP)认证、资历和文件等符合资格。 他提及,国家发展部早在2018年7月,就已针对建筑项目的标准程序规划细节。例如,在提交项目阶段,建设局将对项目蓝图,以及关键结构等的设计计算,进行抽样调查。 这也是确保负责项目的合格人员和认证审查员(accredited checke),都有审核并确保有关设计,是符合建筑管制需求的。 此外,在施工阶段,建设局也会对结构工程进行针对性的检查。 故此,林瑞莲质询,在PIE工程施工时,当局是否曾进行上述审核调查。“PIE高架桥的结构倒塌,根据法庭发现的事实,是否意味着当中有需要弥补的漏洞?” PIE高架桥惨剧 回溯2017年7月14日约凌晨3时30分,衔接樟宜东路上段和泛岛快速公路(PIE)的高架桥在兴建时,突然部分结构坍塌,造成一名中国籍客工丧命和10人受伤。 负责设计高架桥,结果却导致坍塌事故的工程师今早被判86周监禁与1万元罚款。 印尼籍工程师缺乏桥梁设计经验 该起事故当中的46岁印尼籍专业工程师罗伯特(Robert…