Images by Vitaly Kamluk / Twitter

Singapore Airlines (SIA) were quick to reassure passengers on Tuesday (16 Feb) that the camera embedded in some of its inflight entertainment systems have been ‘permanently disabled’.

SIA added that they have no plans to develop any features using those cameras.

They were responding to complaints on social media made by passengers who had spotted the cameras on SIA aircrafts and were concerned about their privacy.

One passenger Vitaly Kamluk has posted several photos of the camera on Twitter on Sunday and asked SIA to clarify the purpose of the cameras:

SIA told Channel NewsAsia that the cameras were built into the hardware provided by the equipment manufacturer.

They said, “Some of our newer inflight entertainment systems provided by the original equipment manufacturers do have a camera provisioned and embedded in the hardware.” They added that the manufacturers had intended to use the cameras for future developments.

However, SIA noted that the cameras have been ‘permanently disabled’ on their aircrafts and assured passengers that it cannot be activated on board. They also reiterated that they do not plan on using the cameras in the future.

According to CNA, 84 of SIA’s aircrafts come with cameras embedded in the in-flight entertainment systems including their A250-900s, A380s, Boeing 777-300ERs, and 787-10s.

Passengers were concerned that the cameras could be used by SIA to record and store information, raising the issue of privacy.

https://twitter.com/alison02207966/status/1097980635531173888

Some users suggested that since SIA said they weren’t using the camera, they should be covered up to put their passengers at ease:

https://twitter.com/TiE23_/status/1097675174692802561

While SIA has said that they don’t intend on using these cameras, it raises the question of why they were installed in the first place and why they haven’t been covered up at all. Surely at some point, someone thought it would be a useful feature to have on an aircraft?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Small Claims Employment Tribunal receives mix reactions

By Yasmeen Banu Ministry of Manpower (MOM) announced last week that they…

Risk of religious sensitivity getting blown out of proportion

By Ghui Religion, multi-culturalism and race are oft-cited reasons for retaining the…

受雇前人力部客服员后挨打不断 女佣不堪受虐爬下15层楼逃

一名前人力部客服职员涉嫌虐待她家的女佣数个月,将后者锁在公寓内,甚至打耳光至脸部出血,女佣被吓得爬下15层楼逃跑。 31岁的被告努尔奥迪达(Nuur Audadi Yusoff)今天(9月28日)面对六项伤害女佣的控状,她对此表示认罪,另外还有九项控状将在判刑时列入考量。 据法院文件指出,被告和家人自2017年12月1日至2018年5月1日,雇佣24岁的印度尼西亚籍女佣,月薪为580元。但是女佣在工作了一个月后,就开始遭到雇主虐待。 据《亚洲新闻台》报导,被告于2018年1月时曾在晚上被女儿的哭声吵醒,发现女佣忘记为女儿涂上婴儿药膏,就质问女佣,对着她吐口水并打了对方耳光两次。 事后的数周,被告因女佣没准备早餐而朝她甩玻璃杯盖;因女佣没有帮孩子洗澡而抓着对方的头发,将她拖到浴室,更抓着女佣的头发要求她为孩子唱歌。 控方指出,女佣在经常被责骂、偶尔被吐口水等各种虐待后,哭着要求转换雇主。被告因此答应不再打她,而女佣就留下来继续工作,因为她需要寄钱回乡养孩子。 被告在2018年4月11日,还曾将女佣带到人力部,帮助她向其前雇主提出欠薪通报。据法庭文件指出,女佣当时非常感谢被告的帮助。 上传孩子照片导致再被虐待 但,在同年的4月21日,被告发现女佣持有一副手机,于是就点开并游览其聊天记录和储存照片。当被告发现自己孩子的照片被上传到脸书时,她感到不高兴,并用手机拍打女佣的脸部,导致女佣脸部红肿出血。 被告没收了手机,并在接下来的一周中,几乎每天都扇女佣耳光,并抓她的头发。…

Animal rights groups react over satirical pamphlet

The Cat Welfare Society (CWS), a volunteer group in Singapore championing cat welfare…