CPF Board has come out to strongly deny that the government had quietly shifted the “retirement payout age” from 65 to 70, in a media report today (20 Jan).

CPF Board’s denial came in response to a recent message circulating online. Someone had posted a picture of a mail he received from CPF Board, notifying him that if would like to receive his CPF payouts starting at 70 years old, he did not have to do anything. However, if he intends to receive his payouts starting at 65, he would still need to inform the CPF Board.

CPF Board told the media that the payout eligibility age for the Retirement Sum Scheme is 65 for those born from 1954 onwards and this has not changed since it was announced in 2007. With regard to the mail posted online, a CPF Board spokesman clarified that the letter was sent to CPF members to inform them that they can start their monthly payouts by completing an application form with their bank account details or to apply online.

“They can apply to start their payouts any time between the ages of 65 and 70. If they do not wish to start payouts before age 70, they need not do anything” and “members who defer the start of their payouts will benefit from getting more retirement savings with the attractive interest that they earn on their CPF savings,” said the spokesman.

The spokesman also said that the CPF Act was amended in 2016 to allow for this automatic payout arrangement, which took effect in Jan 2018. The automatic starting of payouts at age 70 “helps to simplify the activation process for members so they can start to enjoy a retirement income from their CPF savings,” the spokesman added.

However, the spokesman avoided mentioning why the government did not consider starting the automatic payout arrangement at age 65 instead, since this is the official minimum age when a member is eligible for CPF payouts.

Indeed, retiree Johnny Wong, 66, interviewed by the media said that payouts should be automatic when an individual turns 65 years old, and he can have the choice to opt out if he does not want the payout yet, Mr Wong added. In other words, change the default to the other way.

“There may be some who are illiterate or who may not understand how the current scheme works,” Mr Wong said.

CPF Board also posted on its Facebook denying that the government had quietly shifted the “retirement payout age” from 65 to 70. It presented its “facts” on Facebook and asked users to share its post presumably to counter “online rumours”.

“You may have recently come across social media posts and messages that claim that the Government has quietly shifted the ‘retirement payout age’ to 70 for the Retirement Sum Scheme (RSS). This is not true and here are the facts. Do share this with your friends and loved ones,” CPF Board posted on its Facebook page.

However CPF Board wants to present its “facts”, the fact remains that CPF Board only arranges for automatic payout at age 70 and not 65. If a member wants his payouts to start at 65, he must inform CPF Board to do so, something which Mr Wong has highlighted that many illiterate elderly may not know.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

丈夫心脏病骤逝 被指没呈报病历无法索赔

德士司机因心脏病身亡,申请家庭保障计划(Home Protection Scheme)赔偿,却被告知无法索赔,理由是他在购买HPS时,未呈报患有糖尿病和心脏疾病。 德士司机佘春华的遗孀李悦,昨日在《联合早报》撰文分享的经历,引起网民愤慨:李悦称,其丈夫在五个月前载送客人,在高速公路行驶时心脏骤停,但仍用尽最后一口气把德士停在路边,车子和客人毫发无伤。 李悦在这篇题为《我们家的悲凉中秋》表示,丈夫被送到加护病房,她挣扎着是否够负担医药费,最后只好选择拔管送走了丈夫。 面对丧夫之痛,邻居提醒她仍可向家庭保障计划索赔,还能保住房子。公积金局官员也安慰她,已展开索赔程序,不过仍要按时缴交每月1100元的房贷。好心人借了5千元给她,才勉强撑到今天。 但是,临近中秋节时,她却收到公积金来信,指佘春华当初购买HPS,没有呈报患有糖尿病和心脏病,不能索偿,结果李悦只领到公积金局退回的269.46元保费余额。 “信政府才签下保单” “我丈夫是在建屋局签下HPS的,如果有关人员询问,他不会故意隐瞒自己有慢性疾病病史,医院有记录,他也隐瞒不了。现在承保方如何证明签购HPS时已经询问他的健康状况,如何证明已经解释有关条款?当他走进政府部门大门时,他相信这份保险是政府提供的一份保障,跟政府签文件无需怀疑,现在人走了,还落个“不实”的语垢。” 佘春华的HPS保费在去年涨至1382.16元,李悦认为假设丈夫还在世,可能还继续交保费,保那根本不会兑现的海市蜃楼。 德士公司只保车和“活跃”司机 另一方面,德士公司的“效率和冷静”也让李悦感到心寒。她指出,丈夫逝世后,德士公司便来函说已拖回德士,惟找不到车钥匙,还被索讨了25.58元的“修理费”。…

PAP’s Janil Puthucheary: “I did not do NS… those are the facts”

New People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate, Dr Janil Puthucheary, says that he…

Flash flood at Orchard Road and other parts of city central due to heavy rain

Heavy rain which occurred in the afternoon has caused flash flood in…

对比37国养老金机制 荷兰最佳狮城第七

评估全球退休保障计划的墨尔本美世全球养老金指数(Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index),公布今年排行榜。比较37国退休金机制,荷兰蝉联最佳养老金制度冠军宝座,至于新加坡排名第七。 根据报告,第二、第三名为丹麦和澳洲,其他进入前十名的国家分别是:芬兰、瑞典、挪威、新加坡、新西兰、加拿大以及智利。 荷兰以81分今年蝉联冠军,该国退休人士以职业生涯的平均收入为基础享有被评为最佳的养老金制度。 至于我国的中央公积金制度(CPF),总得分70.8分,获得B评级,即指具备一个健全的退休金机制,且具有许多优良的特色,惟“仍有值得改善之处”。 在简介中,该报告介绍中央公积金部分积蓄可提取用来购屋或医疗用途,其余仍作为退休存款;也提到终身入息计划(CPF Life)下须有最低存款额,以及调高会员动用退休储蓄的年龄。 报告指各国政经文教国情不同,固然不能把一国的制度照搬其他地方,惟都会有一些确保社会年长群体受惠、具有可持续性和更高的社会群体信心等特色。 该报告以三大主轴:是否充足(adequacy)(总分40分)、可持续性(…