A member of the public, Albert Tang, wrote to ST Forum and his letter was published on ST today (“Why are SP Group’s rates higher than retailers’?“, 16 Jan).

Mr Tang wanted to know why SP Group didn’t offer the heavily discounted electricity rates, which many of the electricity retailers are currently offering to the public, in the first place.

“I have a seemingly simple question that has yet to receive a satisfactory answer from the electricity retailers I have asked,” he said.

“Given that electricity retailers are looking to make a profit, have spent a significant amount on marketing costs and are still able to offer consumers electricity rates that are a good 20 to 30 per cent lower than SP Group’s, why doesn’t SP Group just offer consumers these lower rates in the first place?”

Indeed, according to moneysmart.sg, one can get a fixed discount of as much as 25% off the regulated tariff from SP Group for floating rates.

For fixed price plans, it can be even higher at 30% discount.

Mr Tang continued, “Many of the 13 or so retailers participating in the OEM do not generate their own power, instead claiming to buy in bulk from power plants to sell to consumers. As the largest bulk buyer of electricity, SP Group should benefit the most from economies of scale, and be able to pass the savings on to consumers.”

“It is hard to understand the logic behind creating the OEM and getting so many retailers to compete for consumers, when SP Group is in a position to bypass this step to sell electricity directly to consumers at more competitive rates,” he added.

“I doubt I am the only consumer puzzled by this, and hope that EMA can give a satisfactory explanation.”

In any case, with the heavily discounted pricing currently being offered by so many electricity retailers, following Mr Tang’s reasoning, one would wonder if SP Group has been overly charging the public all this while.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Panic buying undermines international confidence in Singapore says Minister Chan Chun Sing

On Sunday, Trade and Industry Minister, Chan Chun Sing, cautioned that panic…

四客工追讨工资网络疯传

劳资纠纷?据网民分享照片,四名客工站在联明建筑公司某建筑工地,手上拿着“我要工钱”标语,疑向该公司追讨工资。 有关消息也在社交媒体和Whatsapp疯传,另一视频则显示上述四名客工,站在一群工友前,手持标语。 此事引来民众为工友抱不平,也纷纷想了解工友抗议的建筑工地地点。网民Ah Seng感叹,通常可以帮助捍卫客工权益的资源有限,可能最终结果只能领回基薪并被遣返,但往往涉及压榨员工者不会被严厉对付。 他认为在国际上新加坡雇主对待客工的声誉很差,过去的案例就有不发工资、诈欺或者透过招工代理征收大笔中介费。此次个案或许只是冰山一角。 有网民称,联明曾负责承建许多政府工程。联明是本地一家上市建筑公司,若浏览该公司官网,可发现他曾承负责建许多建屋发展局、裕廊集团和陆路交通机构的公共住宅和基础设施工程项目,当前承建的工程包括建屋发展局在淡滨尼的149户组屋。 本社针对此流传视频,联系联明公司核实详情是否属实,目前仍待该公司回覆。

Penal Code Amendments & Freedom of Speech forums

PUBLIC FORUM ON THE PENAL CODE AMENDMENTS In Nov 2006, the government…

Registration for E-bikes to be required by LTA to better enforce against illegal modification

In a letter submitted to the ST forum on Monday (July 25), Land…