Yesterday (14 Jan), PM Lee hosted Czech Republic Prime Minister Andrej Babis to an official dinner at the Istana.

He told the Czech PM that Bata shoes, which originated from Czech, have strong association with Singaporeans.

Even PM Lee, like the “many generations of school children in Singapore”, can attest to having worn a pair of white canvas Bata shoes to school.

“I wore them too,” he told the Czech PM.

Bata Shoe Company was founded on 24 August 1894 in the Moravian town of Zlin, Austria-Hungary (today’s Czech Republic) by Tomas Bata, a Czech.

However, even though PM Lee might have worn white canvas Bata shoes like the rest of Singaporean school kids, he grew up playing at the Istana while most Singaporean kids in those days play in kampungs or around HDB flats.

In fact, it was reported that at one time, PM Lee and his younger brother Hsien Yang messed up the telephone exchange by unplugging the wires while playing in Istana when they were kids.

In any case, at the official dinner yesterday, PM Lee also thanked the Czech Republic’s “strong and consistent support” for the European Union-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which was signed last October. He hoped the agreement will be ratified by EU soon.

The Czech PM is in Singapore for a two-day official visit.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Utico further extends deadline for its rescue offer to Hyflux

Utico has extended the deadline for acceptance of its proposed rescue package…

High Cost of Medical Care in Singapore

The following article is published by blog Diary of A Singaporean Mind…

李显扬:显龙对遗嘱有疑问 应以公民身份投诉

李显扬再度发文抨击,指总检察署仍未回答他的提问,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?如果总理李显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。 他非议总理假借总检察署,向律师公会提呈其妻子林学芬,指林学芬在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事失职。 李显扬在个人脸书发文写道:“总检察署为何种公共利益服务?事情过了那么久,为何要为私人事务浪费公共资源?其中有许多都是各方已知的事实,但为何选择在2019年仓促重提此案?” “然而,总检察署没有回答这些疑问。反之,当具体到曾向律师公会投诉过五项个案–却没有任何一单是过了五年的旧事,也不涉及四人遗嘱。” 他指出,在各方都有法律代表的情况下,总检察署插手有关私人遗嘱事项,是前所未有的。 “如果显龙对父亲的遗嘱有疑问,理应以私人公民身份提出投诉。” 总理李显龙妹妹李玮玲医生,于本月6日10时42分,在个人脸书揭露总检察署向新加坡律师公会提呈逾500页的投诉信。总检察署在答复媒体询问时指出,李显扬妻子林学芬作为专业律师,在为李光耀准备遗嘱一事,有失职之嫌的表面证据,表面触犯法律专业(专业行为规章)第25节条文和第46节条文。 当局认为,林学芬在李光耀最后一份遗嘱,以李显扬作为受益人的情况下准备遗嘱,并安排李光耀执行,而李显扬获得的份额有增加。 对此,李显扬在本月7日发文回应,其妻子从未担任李光耀的律师,父亲的遗嘱在五年前就已执行。当父亲完成遗嘱后,告知全家和他的律师,遗嘱由李&李律师事务所保管。 他说,没有人在父亲签定最终遗嘱的过程提出投诉—包括父亲自身、任何受益人、以及咨询黄鲁胜(现任总检察长)的李显龙。 他反驳总检察署称妻子林学芬拒绝回应是不实的,并呼吁总检察署公开完整往来信件。 曾担任李显龙私人秘书的总检察长黄鲁胜回避处理林学芬可能专业行为失当一事,事件改由副总检察长余文正负责。…

Migrant workers go hungry in rich Singapore due to subpar catering services

Singapore is well known the world over for its meticulous planning and…