Philippines independent news site Rappler and its CEO Maria Ressa were formally indicted last week for tax evasion, a move that many consider to be politically motivated and designed to silence independent media in the Philippines.

Rappler has long been critical of President Rodrigo Duterte’s ruthless war on drugs that has shocked audiences around the globe. The death toll from extrajudicial and vigilante killings are rapidly on the rise as the government continues to go after dealers and users alike. Rappler has often contested the official death counts and even initiated a social media campaign #RealNumbersPH to counter what it calls a ‘false narrative’ about the governments war on drugs.

Maria Ressa has been quick and thorough about using Rappler as her platform to point out the disinformation campaign that Duterte and his administration is spreading, carefully correcting discrepancies in their stories and alleging bots being used by Duterte loyalists to paint a more favourable picture of their infamous President.

In an article published in 2016 following the Davao bombing and subsequent media frezy, Ms Ressa pointed that the President has employed a strategy of ‘death by a thousand cuts’ which “uses the strength of the internet and exploits the algorithms that power social media to sow confusion and doubt.” In this instance, she pointed out that an old Rappler report had been manipulated and republished on various news sites to give the impression that the bomber has been apprehended swiftly – even though the report was dated and on a different issue.

She emphasised that Duterte has weaponised the internet via bots and fake accounts to silence the President’s critic by sheer volume of ‘alternative reality’ stories and have started a propaganda war. She compared this strategy with that of China where nearly 450 million social media comments are faked each year.

From orchestrating an elaborate social media campaign to calling for a boycott of media, manipulating alogrithms on micro-blogging sites to their advantage and deploying an army of fake social media accounts to carry out personal and vicious attacks on Duterte’s critics, Ms Ressa has blown the top off Duterte’s game plan for twisting facts to secure support for himself while discrediting any and all independent media.

Duterte, vexed by Rappler’s criticisms, launched an attack on Rappler and Ressa, claiming that the site produces only fake news and isn’t even owned by Filipino – a fact that Ressa says is entirely unfounded and they have the documents to prove it. This was followed by an investigation by the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) into Rappler’s ownership back in 2016.

In January of 2018, Rappler’s registration was temporarily revoked by the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the claim that it has violated the country’s constitution over foreign ownership rule. They claimed that Rappler failed to declare $3 million in tax returns in 2015 from an investment by the Omidyar Network, a fund created by Pierre Omidyar, eBay founder and philanthropist.

“I’ve long run out of synonyms for the word ‘ridiculous.’ The basis of this case is that Rappler is classified as a dealer in securities. I am definitely not a stockbroker,” Ms Ressa told CNN after news of the charges broke.

On 29th Nov, formal accusations were brought against Rappler and its CEO. This comes with a potential 10-year prison sentence under the Philippines tax law. When Ms Ressa arrived in Manila on Sunday 2nd Dec, a warrant of arrest had already been issued. She told CNN that she was “ready to post bail and do what our lawyers will advise”.

Ms Ressa’s counsellor, Francis Lim, said that Maria would surrender herself voluntarily to court and request bail which is a constitutionally guaranteed right under the Philippines legal system.

The move was slammed by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) as a direct assault on the freedom of press. Amnesty International added that it was an ‘alarming attempt to silence independence journalism’.

Shawn Crispin, CPJ Southeast Asia representative, said the charges were a “blatant form of legal harassment and underline President Rodrigo Duterte’s desperate attempt to stifle its critical reporting on his government.”

Brad Adams, Asia director for Human Rights Watch, said the case sent “a chilling message to journalists and human rights activists (in the Philippines) that they will be targeted for exposing his murderous campaign.”

In the past President Duterte had personally barred Ressa and Rappler reporter Pia Ranada from his official residence, Malacanang Palace over their critical coverage of his administration. However, Duterte’s office has denied any involvement in these legal actions.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年长妇女坠“小桂林”矿湖 幸得英国游客施救

据报导,昨日一名年长妇女,不知何故坠落武吉巴督的“小桂林”公园内的矿湖,所幸被两位一对英国游客夫妇及时发现,并跳入湖里为她施救,才保住性命。 名为布尔温的65岁女英国游客,昨日刚好在公园散步,但发现有妇女坠入水里,紧紧树枝,只有脸部和鼻子在水面上,命在旦夕。 布尔温马上找人求救,而他的丈夫则试图接近溺水女子;布尔温较后跳进湖里,为女子进行紧急心肺复苏,一边等待救援。 至于新加坡民防部队则向《亚洲新闻台》证实,当局在昨日11时50分接到求助投报,较后该部用救生圈和梯子把有关妇女救起,并送往黄廷芳医院。报导指警方将此事故列为企图自杀,逮捕有关妇女,案件仍在调查中。 今年5月废除企图自杀罪 不过据了解,今年5月,国会通过刑事法改革法案,已废除了企图自杀罪。 不过,教唆未成年、缺乏心智能力者自杀得逞,仍可判死刑或终身监禁,或坐牢长达20年。 如果未成年或缺乏心智能力者自杀未遂,教唆者可判坐牢长达15年。 当时,内政部兼卫生部高级政务次长安宁·阿敏解释,诸如安乐死或医生协助自杀,仍属违法。他也强调废除企图自杀罪,不代表自杀完全无罪,诸如唆使他人自杀,仍属犯罪行为。 两年前“小桂林”湖中捞出男性尸体 回溯2017年10月27日,警方在“小桂林”湖区发现男性尸体。民防部队接到投报,指有人掉入矿湖。民防部队赶往搜救,在下午4点20分,发现这具男子尸体,并打捞上岸。  

Inflated legal costs—all eyes on SMC for now

In recent weeks, there have been a lot written in some blogs…

Veteran architect Tay Kheng Soon raises questions on criteria used in constructing and operating migrant workers' dorms

Recent reports of overcrowding, insufficient meals and other major issues surrounding conditions…

【就业准证薪金门槛调高】人力部要有街头智慧 对付顽劣雇主

本社报道,人力部将提高S准证和就业准证的薪金门槛,尽管这是好消息,但也引发各界的忧虑,特别是“上有政策,下有对策”,一些老练圆滑的雇主,总有方法规避这些僵化的政府政策。 例如人民党成员欧斯曼(Khan Osman Sulaiman)就表示,若不愿去限制就业准证在本地劳动市场的比例,仍是治标不治本;雇主懂得滥用、迂回就业准证薪金门槛,已是老生常谈。 一些网民担忧,一些雇主仍能透过“报大数”,同样高薪资聘请外籍人士,但与外籍雇员协商,领取较少薪资,不失为业界的“潜规则”。 应区分本地人和永久居民 人民之声成员林启超(Simon Lim),也指虽支持政府的薪金门槛提高举措,但也应将“本地人”更仔细区分。 林启超于26日在脸书上发文表示,对于政府的薪金门槛提高举措无任欢迎,但政府应该也要将“本地人”更仔细地区分,例如本国人和永久居民的区别。 “或许通过新的税赋、调整公积金缴费率,甚至某种形式的税收以此区分。” 他也提醒政府,人民之所以投票支持现任政府,旨在获得更好的保障。 “新加坡政府绝对不能忘记,它欠所有新加坡人一个最基本的保障。首先,新加坡人确实应该获得优先的就业机会,比起永久居民。”…