Earlier, TOC published an article revealing that Koufu’s subsidiary, Hawker Management Pte Ltd, operating the new public funded Jurong West Hawker Centre, has awarded its cleaning and dishwashing contract to GreatSolutions, a company owned by one brother of Koufu’s boss.

The contract let GreatSolutions earn close to $64,000 a month.

With netizens’ anger mounting and more people talking about possible conflict of interests in Koufu’s subsidiary awarding the cleaning contract, Straits Times (ST) decided to publish a news report yesterday (17 Oct) giving the government’s side of the story.

ST went on to interview the National Environment Agency (NEA), the government agency in-charge of all the public funded hawker centres.

NEA: Nothing wrong

NEA said it requires the social enterprise operator of Jurong West Hawker Centre to ensure that there is “open and fair competition”, as well as a “transparent, value-for-money” system, when procuring cleaning services for the centre.

It also observed that Koufu has been upfront about its relationship with GreatSolutions that Koufu’s boss, Pang Lim, and GreatSolutions’ boss, Pang Pok, are brothers.

NEA noted that Koufu IPO prospectu has already made it clear that GreatSolutions is an “interested person”. In other words, there is nothing legally wrong about Koufu’s boss giving contracts to his brothers’ companies.

The document went on to state that Koufu will only enter into contracts for the provision of such services, or electrical services, by the mandated interested persons if it is “satisfied that the rates or prices from (them) are not higher than the most competitive quote provided by other third-party service providers for comparable services”.

According to the prospectus, such contracts will only be entered after obtaining competing quotes from at least two unrelated third-party service providers, and taking into account other relevant factors.

In addition, Koufu also listed another company Brightlink Electrical as an interested party. It provides electrical services to Koufu’s food and beverage outlets and is part-owned by another brother, Mr Pang Pong San.

Koufu’s subsidiary also told ST, “All such transactions are subject to a rigorous review process and entered into on an arm’s length basis.”

Meanwhile, hawkers at Jurong West Hawker Centre are made to pay $0.20 on behalf of patrons for each tray returned by patrons under the agreeement with Koufu’s subsidiary. This has resulted in further losses incurred by hawkers to the tune of several hundreds dollars more a month.

In an earlier statement, NEA which is headed by Brigadier General (NS) Tan Meng Dui, commented that the hawkers were “aware of charges” before signing the agreement with Koufu’s subsidiary.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Spend $30 million to disburse $61 million?

~by: Leong Sze Hian~ I refer to the increase in funding to…

Security guards’ stats – something for Desmond Choo to ponder over

Leong Sze Hian/ I refer to the article “’I understand how the…

2007 predicted to be world’s warmest year

This excerpt is taken from Reuters By Jeremy Lovell LONDON (Reuters) –…

近三百人失候选人资格 党委不得参政 泰法院宣判爱国党解散

泰国大选在即,泰国爱国党(Thai Raksa Chart)因推荐公主成为首相候选人闹上官司,昨日泰国宪法法院正式宣判解散爱国党,该党所有282名候选人即刻失去参选资格,而党行政执委也被限制在未来10年内不能参与任何政治活动。 泰国将于本月24日举行全国大选,登记候选人的截止日期已过,因此爱国党面对解散判决,意味着其候选人将无缘此次大选。换言之,在来届大选中,军政府的敌手就少了一个劲敌,而前首相他信回国之路再添阻。 宪法法院于昨日下午宣判,指爱国党推选皇室成员为候选人违反了《政党法》、抵触君主制在政治立场上的中立立场。法院也重申宪法规定皇室成员凌驾于政治之说,必须在政治立场上保持中立,不能参政。 法院指出,虽然爱国党有选择候选人的自由和权力,但是他们的选择不可为君主立宪制政体带来不利影响,也不可以破坏或损坏君主制的政治中立立场。 爱国党接受判决 爱国党党魁布伊普查在超过20名党员和党委的陪同下,到法院聆听审判。接获有关宣判后,他虽然显得情绪激动,但是仍然对记者表示接受判决,感谢支持者一路的支持,但是仍然会怀着对国家有利的善意去做事。 现场的支持者对有关的判决感到无力,甚至落泪。现场也见警员戒备。基于案件的特殊性,泰国警方出动了超过1200人部署在法院内外和四周。据悉,现场更安装了愈70部监视器,媒体不获准进入法院内,只能在大厅外观看电视现场直播。 公主:令人沮丧的消息 爱国党于2月8日宣布推荐泰王长姐乌汶叻公主竞选首相职位,当天晚上泰王就发出皇室文告,斥责有关的举动极为不恰当,违反了宪法,也违反了皇室立场。选举委员会在数日后宣布乌汶叻公主不符合候选人资格,并且将对爱国党采取法律行动。 身在德国的乌汶叻公主在接获有关消息后,透过Instagram向支持者说道,“爱国党被解散是一个非常悲伤和令人沮丧的消息“。…