~by: Leong Sze Hian~

I refer to the increase in funding to family service centres of about $100 million, over the next three years (“More family service centres, extra $30m funding in coming years”, (Straits Times, Feb 9).

This works out to an annual funding of about $33.3 million.

According to ComCare's annual report for the financial year 2010 which ended on 31 March 2011, $61 million was disbursed to 20,300 needy families under various ComCare programmes.
 
The ComCare Endowment Fund has about $811 million, and Comcare disbursements was about $44, $48, $50, $66 and $61 million in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, to about 21,000, 20,000, 25,000, 26,000 and 20,300 needy families, respectively.
 
Ratio of costs of disbursement to funding
 
If we include the funding to the five Community Development Councils and the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports, I estimate the total annual funding to deliver the ComCare schemes to be about $30 million.
 
How much are we spending a year to disburse the Comcare schemes?
 
Whilst it is always good to increase funding to organisations who administer the assistance to  needy families under ComCare, we should also bear in mind the costs of delivery versus the assistance disbursed.
 
Need to review processes?
 
Should we review our processes to see if they are overly cumbersome, time-consuming or costly, in the disbursement of funds to people with needs?
 
Is spending $30 million to disburse $61 million to needy families an efficient ratio?
 
What are the benchmarks for other countries?

 

 


Support TOC! Buy Uncle Leong’s book here!

 
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Itemised payslips to be made mandatory for workers

Amendments to the Employment Act were tabled in Parliament on Monday, including…

2020年大选:政治的分水岭和希望重生

来自博客Jentrified Citizen 数十年来,许多新加坡人一直笼罩在无可匹敌的巨人下,即人民行动党(PAP)。我们眼睁睁看着他们扰乱了我们的宪法,并强制实行了如《防假消息法》这样不民主的压迫性法律。 当我们亲眼看见他们如何打击异议者,摧毁当时工人党的领头羊–老惹耶勒南(JB Jeyaratnam)、邓亮洪和民主党徐顺全的名声和生活时,潸然泪下。当他们以傲慢和不尊重的姿态对待我们,使我们感觉更像二等公民时,我们备受伤害和羞辱。 在经历2015年大选后,人民行动党赢得近七成的选票,成绩可说是相当令人失望,许多期待新加坡作出改变的人民也变得沮丧,因为等待我们的即是执政党对我们的加强严控,更任由网络枪手(Internet Brigade)肆虐,加剧了其政治品牌的“毒性”。随着《防假消息法》的实施,其绝望感日益增长。这些法律据称是为了打击网络中的虚假新闻,但事实上,它却成为执政党的武器,最终有些声音只能被迫沉默下来,隧道尽头的光也逐渐暗淡。 2020年大选使人民重燃希望 然而,随着2020年7月11日的大选的结果出炉,又重新燃起了许多人的希望。黎明时分,你甚至会听到后港和盛港人民在街道上响起热烈的欢呼和掌声,回荡全岛。 确实,我们非常值得庆祝。这次是我国独立以来,第二次所有选区都有人上阵,这非常重要。有好些年,一些选区不劳而获,部分因素与政治分肥(pork barrel politics)和杰利蝾螈(gerrymandering)现象有关,…

Upgrading of signalling system for NSL to be completed by March this year and EWL by 2018

Minister for transport Khaw Boon Wan has announced that the upgrade of…

Whose future is “shining”, really?

Ministers to get a 3rd pay hike. What about the elderly?