A crowd in Singapore (Photo by pzAxe/Shutterstock.com)

Singapore is one of the worst performing countries in the world at tackling inequality, according to a newly released edition of the Commitment to Reducing Inequality Index developed by Oxfam and Development Finance International.

The index, which ranks 157 countries on their policies on social spending, tax, and labor rights is being published ahead of this week’s meeting of finance ministers and other economic leaders at the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Annual Meeting in Bali, Indonesia.

Singapore ranks 149 out of 157 countries despite being one of the world’s wealthiest nations. It is one of only three high-income countries in the bottom 50. The report says that the government’s poor performance across the three indicators considered critical to tackling inequality is fueling inequality in the country.

In terms of tax, the Oxfam reports places Singapore as the world’s worst performing country on tax (157th place).  This is partly because Singapore under taxes wealthy individuals and corporations, says the report.  Singapore’s corporation tax stands at just 17% and the maximum personal income tax rates for high earners are just 22%. Moreover, the report indicated that Singapore also has a number of harmful tax practices that enable corporations to avoid billions of dollars of tax at home and abroad – depriving governments of the funds they need to tackle poverty and inequality.

On the rating of labour rights, Singapore also scored poorly, placing at 71. The report hangs this on the lack of equal pay or non-discrimination laws for women, adding that the laws on both rape and sexual harassment are inadequate. Singapore’s lack of a universal minimum wage also contributes to this low ranking.

Finally, the last indicator of inequality if health. In this, it was reported that Singapore’s spending on health, education and social protection is one of the lowest among the rich countries (91st place). Only 39 percent of the country’s budget goes to education, health and social protection combined – well below countries such as South Korea and Thailand which spent half their budget in these areas.  Singapore also cut spending on education by over 5 percent in 2017/18 which was one of the biggest percentage cuts in education spending in the world during this period.

“Singapore can play a huge role in tackling inequality at home and around the globe. By taking steps to strengthen labour rights, enacting anti-discrimination laws and increasing spending at home, Singapore can bridge the inequality divide,” says Oxfam’s Head of Inequality policy, Max Lawson. He added that Singapore is a position to send a strong message on global inequality by ending harmful tax practices that provide a haven for tax evasion. He said, “As it stands Singapore is part of the problem of burgeoning global inequality, but it can be a part of the solution.“

The index also reveals a clear split between countries such as Singapore, Nigeria and India which are fueling inequality and those such as South Korea and Indonesia that are fighting it. For example, Indonesia (90th place) is taking steps to implement a system of universal health coverage and increased spending on health to support this. It has also increased the minimum wage and improved tax collection.

Across East Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific, only Laos PDR (150th place) ranks lower than Singapore on the Index. However, the index also shows that all countries, even those at the top, could be doing much more.

Inequality slows economic growth, undermines the fight against poverty and increases social tensions. The World Bank predicts that unless governments tackle inequality the goal of eradicating extreme poverty by 2030 will not be met and almost half a billion people will still be living in extreme poverty.

Matthew Martin, Development Finance International’s director said, “What’s most striking is how clearly the Index shows us that combatting inequality isn’t about being the wealthiest country or the one of the biggest economy. It’s about having the political will to pass and put into practice the policies that will narrow the gap between the ultra-rich and the poor. This index clearly lets us see who’s doing that and who’s not.”

So then the question for Singapore and its leaders now is this: What can we do to fix this?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

选委会三度延迟后宣布 泰大选成绩5月9公布

泰国大选非官方成绩经过三度延迟公布后,泰国选举委员会正式表明完整官方成绩将在5月9日公布。 泰国选举委员会秘书长吉隆维特强调,官方计票系统没有任何问题,计票过程也没有出现错误。 他是在记者会上发表上述言论,并且指出目前已经点算了95%的选票,会善用选委会所拥有的150天公布官方票选数据时间,因此会在5月9日宣布官方票选成绩,要求泰国国民耐心等待结果。 接获110项涉嫌违例投诉 他也指出,选委会一共接获了110项针对选举程序涉嫌违例的投诉,并将在5月9日前会将之处理好。 泰国选举于星期日(24日)举行,于当天下午5时结束。惟选委会于当天晚上表示,初步点算结果将在隔日,即星期一(25日)早上10时公布,随后再次宣布将公布时间延至下午2时(新加坡时间下午3时),却未道明原因。 直至下午2时,选委会仅表示95%的选票已经获得点算,意味着公布时间三度延迟。 根据《曼谷邮报》报导指出,已经被点算的94%选票中,亲军方的公民力量党仍然遥遥领先,赢得793万选票,为泰党赢得742万票,未来前进党得票587万张,民主党则赢得370万张选票。 报道也指出,下议院500议席中的350直选席中,为泰党暂时取得135席、公民力量党得98席,而未来前进党有望得到19席、民主党得34席,和自豪泰党得39席。 泰国下议院分别由350直选席和150政党名单议席组成若政党在直选席所得到的席位数量,多过安全过得票率计算下可得到的政党名单议席数量,将无法获得政党名单议席的分配。 而且根据泰国选举制度,下议院的议席共有500席,上议院有250席,上下议院750名议员联合投票选出首相。其实只要亲军方的公民力量党取得126席,加上原本就由军方指派的250个上议院议席,该党就能推举属意的人选担任首相,而目前来看,巴育仍是军方的不二人选。但是,目前该党所获得的议席不允许单独执政。 或引发另一波抗议潮…

Electricity tariff revision to increase by an average of 2.1% for period 1 Oct to 31 Dec 2018

The electricity tariffs will increase by an average of 2.1% or 0.48…

【选举】没有群众大会? 人民之声党将办线上“客厅集会”

“人民之声”党(People’s Voice)领袖林鼎律师称,本周末将在社交媒体上直播该党的与民交流活动。 昨日,林鼎已表示人民之声不会随行动党脚步立即恢复拜访居民活动,而将等到下周五才进行家访,以降低民众感染风险。 不过,该党将在下周日(21日)进行线上直播“客厅集会”,让支持者或普通民众,从家里拍摄、阐述他们对新加坡的心声,并在网络上向全国直播和交流。 他也指出,这也符合该党强调“重建新加坡家园”的主张。 “我们相信人民的思想、资源和力量,并以此为促进和成立一个基础政策的平台,使得更多人受益……我们相信,在寻常百姓家中、各文化和各家庭环境的人们直接交流,是最好的传递方式。” 林鼎指责人民行动党无视大多数国人的声音、市民的经济状况,似乎仍想在这段期间举行大选。“人民之声认为,此时给我们国家带来额外负担,是可耻且残酷的。” 林鼎表示,该党将会在脸书上分享“客厅聚会”活动的日程,欢迎民众可透过脸书或YouTube收看直播,错过的朋友也在较后重看网上片段。 “如果你想成为我们‘客厅聚会’的接力赛主持人,只要有一个客厅和无线连接,我们很乐意到你家进行拜访和拍摄。如果需要,还可以保持匿名。有兴趣者,可以直接电邮到[email protected]。”

Surbana Jurong clarifies that it was “called upon” to build care centres for COVID-19 patients; rejects claims of profiteering and corruption

Surbana Jurong Private Limited said that it was “called upon” to quickly…