ST reported today (18 Sep) that 9 new NMPs have been selected to enter Parliament. They are:

  1. Labour unionist Arasu Duraisamy
  2. Sakae Holdings chairman Douglas Foo Peow Yong
  3. Executive director of the Singapore Chinese Orchestra Ho Wee San
  4. Communication and technology professor Lim Sun Sun
  5. Founder of inter-religious non-profit group Roses of Peace Abbas Ali Mohamed Irshad
  6. Corporate social responsibility consultant Anthea Ong Lay Theng
  7. President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Singapore Irene Quay Siew Ching
  8. Labour economist and associate professor Walter Edgar Theseira
  9. Paralympian swimmer Yip Pin Xiu

All the present NMPs, whose terms end on Friday (21 Sep), have stepped down. The 9 new NMPs are said to have “met all the constitutional criteria and requirements”.

Leader of the House Grace Fu said in the statement that these 9 NMPs come with good credentials in their respective fields, and have keen interest in a broad range of issues.

One of the new NMPs, Sakae Holdings chairman Douglas Foo, told ST that he was excited to take on the new role at such an interesting time in Singapore’s economy.

“I hope to use this platform to reach out to businesses and spread the message about how important it is for them to take a hard look at their business models and use digital technology to innovate and prepare themselves for the future economy,” he said.

Sakae Holdings chairman Douglas Foo no stranger to controversy

Mr Foo is no stranger to controversy. In a media interview a few years ago in Sep 2012, He said that despite offering $3,000 salary for dishwashing at Sakae Sushi, no Singaporeans wanted to take on the job (‘$3,000 salary on offer but still no takers for dishwashing jobs‘, 13 Sep 2012).

And those who took up dishwashing quit soon after they discovered how tough it could be, he said.

He told the media that his restaurant chain’s advertisement on social-networking site Facebook for dishwashers, with the pay highlighted, was not a marketing gimmick. He also disclosed that his dishwashers’ wage was what Sakae Sushi paid their managers and supervisors too.

“Yes, the salary is high but look, it’s a tough job. You stand on your feet, work weekends and it’s dirty and wet,” he noted.

Mr Foo said he is looking for Singaporeans and permanent residents. “If we can hire a local guy, why not? I’d rather we do this than rely on a foreigner.”

ST reported that at $3,000 a month, dishwashers at Sakae Sushi earned about three times what their counterparts elsewhere could get.

Even then NTUC deputy secretary-general Ong Ye Kung asked on his Facebook page, “I am surprised at $3,000 there are no takers.” He added that its Employment and Employability Institute is contacting Mr Foo’s company to help them.

Company “clarifies” with regard to $3k salary figure

When the news came out that Mr Foo was offering $3k for dishwashers, some 300 enquiries and applications poured in. ST followed up with a report the next day (‘$3k a month to wash dishes? They want the job‘,14 Sep 2012) reporting about it.

“They (applicants) came after the restaurant chain made headlines for saying it could not get workers at that ($3k) salary, which is more than twice what an average dishwasher earns,” ST reported.

Then, Mr Foo’s company, Sakae Sushi, came out to clarify that the position also includes other cleaning responsibilities, not just dishwashing only. “(It) is very physically demanding,” the company said on its Facebook page.

Sakae Holdings Brand and communications manager Gregg Lewis further clarified that the dishwashers need to work 12 hours a day, six days a week – from 10.30am to 10.30pm. This differed slightly from the nine hours a day that Mr Foo had told the media earlier.

“What Douglas (Foo) mentioned previously (9 hours a day) was based on one of the scenarios tested that was found not to be feasible due to crowd volume,” Mr Lewis said trying to cover for Mr Foo.

Then netizens discussed online wondering if Mr Foo’s company had flouted the Employment Act by forcing workers to work for more than 44-hour per week, since working 12 hours a day for 6 days would mean a 72-hour work week.

Mr Foo then further clarified that the $3k package indeed included overtime pay for the extra hours and as such, it did not contravene the Act.

Netizens call for boycott of Sakae Sushi

Many netizens at the time, felt Mr Foo was not sincere when he talked about offering dishwashers the $3k salary. Many called for a boycott of his restaurant chain.

A hardwarezone forumer said of Mr Foo at the time:

“What the boss of this restaurant did is so shameful. He went to say there are no Singaporean takers for a $3000 a month dishwasher job wiping dirt off dishes before putting it into the dishwasher. This gave the impression that lowly skilled Singaporeans are fussy workers demanding too much pay… It turned out this is a 72 hours 6 days a week job. Given 44 hours a week is the MOM legal work week, it means the worker is suppose to perform a whopping 28 hours of OT with one day of rest per week. This is $10 per hour wage lower than the lowest minimum wage in Australia, USA, etc. It is hardship money. Even if I have money I’ll never eat at this SAKAE SUSHI.”

Now that Mr Foo is an NMP, do you think he would help push for implementing a minimum wage policy for Singaporeans?

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“游乐场严禁游玩奔跑”? 荒谬告示牌成网上笑柄

想象一下,若你走入一间餐厅却见告示牌上写着“严禁在餐厅内饮酒吃饭”、或在泳池内挂着“严禁游泳”的告示牌,甚至是在赌场中挂着“严禁赌博”的告示牌,是否会觉得嘀笑皆非。虽然这些滑稽讽刺的迹象让任何目睹它的人都无法相信,但在几年前,就真有这样的情况出现。 脸书群组All Singapore Stuff前天(7月23日)上载了一张竖立在一个游乐场的告示牌,上面写着“严禁在游乐场内跑步或游戏”。 不过经本社查证,有关游乐场“禁止游玩令”的告示牌,曾在2013年6月报导过。该告示牌当时竖立盛港东路第323B栋组屋的一个游乐场上,写着不允许儿童在该组屋游乐场上跑步或游戏,引来居民嘲笑。 有居民投诉使用者发出太大噪音 据报导,该游乐场位于盛港西国会议员蓝彬明医生选区内,当时他也是宏茂桥市镇会主席。 当时他告诉《海啸时报》,过去因为有居民投诉游乐场发出太大噪音,所以立个告示牌,善意提醒游乐场的使用者,要多为他人着想避免过度喧哗。 “我们过去确实收到居民指新生儿被嘈杂声吵醒的投诉。”但就连蓝彬明本身也不清楚,告示牌怎么会呈现这样的用词。 他表示,有关告示牌约在六年前有该市镇会前任管理树立,但数年来也没有收到投诉。 “市镇会已被指示移除该告示牌,因为我认为它已没有必要了。” 蓝彬明强调可能这个“一次性”的告示牌用词不当,更指说,“较好的表达应该是‘请体谅并避免过分喧哗’。”…

不满疫情下举行选举 公民入禀法庭提宪法挑战

新加坡公民迪哥达(Daniel De Costa),前日由代表律师拉维(M Ravi)入禀法庭,针对疫情下举行选举提出宪法挑战,而法庭将在下周一(29日)聆审。 迪哥达申诉在当前情况下选举,已经违反让人民参与自由公平选举的权益。为此要求法庭重申公民投票的权益。 而拉维则将协助迪哥达,援引选举法第24(3)项,申请禁令禁止选举官当前进行选举程序。 法庭受理上述入禀,原本聆审定在7月2日,即提名日(6月30日)后,不过拉维在昨日的审前会议挑战,提名日当天都可能出现不劳而获的议席,为此申诉聆审应在提名日之前进行。 而拉维稍后接受本社采访,认为针对民主党副主席陈两裕的个案,政府似乎没把在宪法下赋予公民投票的权益当一回事。迪哥达也关注,在疫情下的选举公民的投票权益是否遭侵蚀。

"Rain" within Raffles Place station due to fire sprinklers accidentally triggered

Videos of “rain” happening within Raffles Places station on Wednesday (19 April)…

DFS to leave Changi Airport in 2020 after close to 40 years of selling liquor and tobacco

Changi Airport’s oldest and biggest tenant is withdrawing from its liquor and…