Dr Balakrishnan at Parliament speaking about the water agreement

In Parliament today (9 Jul), Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan said he expects Malaysia to fully honour the terms of the 1962 Water Agreement, including the price of water, signed between Singapore and Malaysia.

“The 1962 Water Agreement was guaranteed by both Singapore and Malaysia in the 1965 Separation Agreement, which in turn was registered with the United Nations,” he said.

Tying the 1962 Water Agreement to the 1965 Separation Agreement signed between both countries, Minister Balakrishnan added, “Any breach of the 1962 Water Agreement would call into question the Separation Agreement, which is the basis for Singapore’s very existence as an independent sovereign state.”

Water has been in the spotlight in recent weeks after Dr Mahathir said in an interview with Bloomberg last month that the 1962 water supply deal with Singapore was “too costly” for Malaysia and that he wanted to talk to Singapore about it.

“We will sit down and talk with them, like civilized people,” Dr Mahathir told Bloomberg.

The water agreement allows Singapore to draw up to 250 million gallons of raw water from Johor daily at three sen (1.01 Singapore cents) per 1,000 gallons.

Vivian: Malaysia benefited from water pricing arrangement

In Parliament, Minister Balakrishnan noted that Singapore has already stated its position on the water issue comprehensively.

“The core issue is ‘not how much we pay, but how any price revision is decided upon’,” he said. “Neither Malaysia nor Singapore can unilaterally change the terms of this agreement between our two countries.”

He also added that Malaysia has previously acknowledged that they themselves have benefited from the pricing arrangement under the deal.

Johor currently buys treated water from Singapore at 50 sen per 1,000 gallons, as provided for under the 1962 Water Agreement. This is a fraction of the cost to Singapore of treating the water, he further noted.

“Hence, in 2002, then-PM Dr Mahathir said that Malaysia did not ask for a review when it was due as Malaysia knew that any revision would also affect the price of treated water sold by Singapore to Malaysia.”

According to a MFA media release on its website, it costs Singapore RM2.40 to treat every 1,000 gallons of water. By selling the treated water to Malaysia at 50 sen or 21% of cost, Singapore is providing a subsidy of RM1.90 per 1,000 gallons to Malaysia. Everyday, Singapore is providing a water subsidy of RM70,000 to Malaysia, it said.

Singaporean households charged at least 672% more for treated water from PUB

Meanwhile, Singapore’s water prices were raised earlier this month (1 Jul). The new water tariff which Singapore households now have to pay is:

  • S$1.21 per cubic meter, for consumption below 40 cubic meter per month
  • S$1.42 per cubic meter, for consumption exceeding 40 cubic meter per month

This does not include the Water Conservation Tax or the Waterborne Fee. If both are included, the total water price would be:

  • S$2.74 per cubic meter, for consumption below 40 cubic meter per month
  • S$3.69 per cubic meter, for consumption exceeding 40 cubic meter per month

Since MFA said that it costs Singapore RM2.40 or S$0.81 to treat every 1,000 gallons (4.55 cubic meter) of water, that means it costs Singapore S$0.178 to treat every cubic meter of water. Including the cost of buying water from Malaysia at 3 sen per 1000 gallons or S$0.0022 per cubic meter, the total cost to Singapore for 1 cubic meter of treated water would be $0.178+$0.0022 or S$0.18.

To summarize, PUB buys water from Malaysia at S$0.0022 per cubic meter and spends another S$0.178 per cubic meter to treat it, giving a total cost of S$0.18 per cubic meter. It then in turn, sells to Singaporean households at S$1.21 per cubic meter (using the above $1.21 rate and excluding Water Conservation Tax and the Waterborne Fee). This translate to at least 672% more Singaporean households have to pay for the treated water from PUB. And if we use the S$2.74 rate which is inclusive of taxes, Singaporean households end up paying 1,522% more.

So, can PUB give Singaporeans a breakdown how consumers are being charged 672% more after buying water at 3 sen from Malaysia and treating it at RM2.40 per 1,000 gallons?

Furthermore, can PUB also explain the S$1.1 billion profits it gained in the last 7 years, as noted by financial blogger Leong Sze Hian?


Editor’s note – It would help a lot to explain to the citizens on the cost to treat water via the Newater or desalination process. However, PUB chooses to lump everything together and justify the increase of water by simply referring to the investments made by the government on water treatment. Based on past figures, it seems that the government will eventually be profiting from the sale of utilities even though the upfront investment is high.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP's chief Pritam Singh: Circuit breaker may push some people with underlying mental conditions over the edge

The Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh said in a Facebook post…

Fire breaks out at two-storey warehouse in Tuas; no injury reported

In the early hours of Wednesday (13 May), 70 firefighters were rushed…

【选举】恐引群聚增染疫风险 警拒放行民主党徒步募款活动

新加坡民主党宣布,今年为期三天的“言出必行”(Walk the talk)筹款活动暂停,因为警方拒绝有关的活动申请。 2015年,民主党在党秘书长徐顺全的带领下,徒步环绕全岛140公里,以便筹募政治资金。 民主党今日在脸书帖文宣布这项消息,指出警方拒绝批准有关活动,主要是担忧聚集人们,提高冠状病毒19的感染风险。 “基于是草根活动,即使只有一个人(徐顺全)进行,也可能吸引民众群集,导致民众和参与者都暴露在感染冠毒的高风险中。” 这不禁让该党纳闷,若警员都会担心募款活动会导致民众群集而提高染病风险,为什么人民行动党要在这个时候举办选举呢? 惟,在帖文中,该党也表示不会因此而退缩,并促请民众基于支持,透过购买党的商品或捐赠来帮助他们的竞选活动。

扎吉哈:职场歧视问题下降 逾八成求职者称未被歧视

人力部与国家发展部国务部长扎吉哈表示,有关工作场所中的歧视已下降了65巴仙,超过八成的求职者称自己在工作场所时并未被歧视。 非选区议员贝理安于昨日(3日)国会询及是否针对工作场所内的歧视问题,针对员工进行调查。 扎吉哈在昨日(3日)国会中透露,若要证明工作场所的歧视问题,并非取决于其感知调查,更应该关注人力部的相关投诉数量,而人力部近年来所收到的投诉已逐渐减少,从2015年的580宗投诉,下降至2018年里只有200宗,而2018年中的200宗功占据人力部所接收到的总投诉量不足1巴仙。 他续指,人力部曾在2018年进行公平就业做法调查,发现逾八成的求职者认为,无论是性别、婚姻状态、孩子人数、种族与宗教、国籍等都并非成为求职时的障碍,而且大多数员工认为在工作条件、福利、培训及职业发展等方面,都受到了公平的对待。 同时,他称含有歧视性的招聘广告目前也很少见,并透露过去十年中,妇女和老年人的就业机会也有所改善,例如55岁至64岁的就业率从2009年的57巴仙上升至2019年间的68巴仙;而同时,25岁至64岁的女性就业率则从2002年64巴仙增至2019年的73巴仙。 除了就业率增长,扎基也表示,性别薪酬的差距也随着时间的推移,从2002年的8.8巴仙降至2018年的6.3巴仙。 然而,针对相关调查,贝里安表示是否能够提供更多细节,包括在调查面临歧视性做法时的受访者,扎基指出,他无法立即提供更多细节,因为当初仅问道政府是否进行调查,但他也透露,仍然会有少数雇主会“故意规避就业原则及要求”。 不过他披露,在该项调查中共涵盖了3100人和3400家企业,因此达到了可信标准。尽管没有具体调查日期,但他透露,人力部也将会在今年晚些时候,发表一份相关公平就业的调查。