Singapore Airlines Airbus A380-841 taxis around CDG Airport on March 29, 2010. Singapore Airlines is the flag carrier of Singapore. It was the launch customer of Airbus A380 from Shutterstock.com

The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has today launched enforcement action against five major airlines, including Singapore Airlines (SIA) for denying passengers the compensation they are legally entitled to, for delayed flights.
The other airlines are American Airlines, Emirates, Etihad, and Turkish Airlines.
CAA stated that these airlines face enforcement action, after a CAA review found each of the airlines to be breaching consumer law, noting that the airlines had confirmed to the CAA they do not pay compensation to passengers.
“The airlines’ refusal to pay compensation in these instances fails to meet the legal passenger rights requirements for flight disruption,” it stressed.
Under European rules, passengers are legally entitled to compensation if they arrive at the final destination of their journey more than three hours late – including if booked on a connecting flight – unless the delay was due to extraordinary circumstances. These rights apply to any flight departing an EU airport, regardless of the nationality of the airline.
CAA stressed that this is an important issue for passengers, as it estimates that over 200,000 passengers each year travelling on these airlines could be at risk of missing their onward connection and thereby being delayed by over three hours at their final destination.
However, it noted that Singapore Airlines currently places compensation claims for these delays on hold.
Richard Moriarty, Director of Consumers and Markets at the CAA, said, “Any disruption to a flight is frustrating for passengers, but delays that cause people to miss connecting flights have a particularly damaging effect on people’s travel plans. That’s why there are clear laws in place to make sure passengers that experience this type of disruption are looked after by their airline and compensated when the disruption was in the airline’s control. ”
“Airlines’ first responsibility should be looking after their passengers, not finding ways in which they can prevent passengers upholding their rights. So it’s disappointing to see a small number of airlines continuing to let a number of their passengers down by refusing to pay them the compensation they are entitled to,” he stated.
‘Where we see evidence of passengers systematically being denied their rights, we will not hesitate to take the necessary action to ensure airlines change their policies and their customers get the assistance they are entitled to,” the Director added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SG High Commissioner seeks mercy from new Indian state govt after SG plonks $4B into state

Last month, it was reported that the joint venture project between Singapore…

NEA should look into why dishwashing charges for hawkers cost so much

by Lim Jialiang On Dishwashing – One of the most perplexing costs…

读者批评宿舍经营者盈利颇丰 胜捷集团行政总裁强调重视客工福利

早前,《海峡时报》报导,近30万客工在疫情下,需遵守阻断措施待在宿舍,这也致使客工宿舍成本增加,政府将承担宿舍业者的额外成本。 对此,一名《海峡时报》读者唐立(译音),在本月21日发文,批评宿舍经营者理应自行承担额外开销。他认为,这些业者把宿舍空间能容纳的人数最大化,藉此获利颇丰。 新加坡巡回大使许通美教授也在4月初抨击,客工住在在过于拥挤的宿舍“如挤沙丁鱼”;媒体过去报导一些宿舍房间甚至容纳多达20人,这也不是新鲜事。 唐立提及,去年(截至2019年12月31日),胜捷集团取得1.33亿新元的营收,其中取得高达1亿0380万元的丰厚利润。对此他质问,如果我国的体制若允许业者透过上述方式盈利,那么是否也该由他们自行承担成本。 不过,胜捷集团行政总裁江志明随即在《海时》作出反驳,指业者仅仅靠把宿舍空间可容纳人数最大化,藉此获利的说法显得误导和偏驳。 他承认去年该集团确实取得1亿0380万元的利润,但这其中时包括第四季度一项高达6千630万元的一次性公允估值收益。 撇开上述一次性的收益,而该集团核心业务净利润达达3千820万元,这比较能体现该公司的业绩。其中42巴仙则包括新加坡以外的宿舍业务。 他也指出,在2019财年,客工宿舍的回报率为6.57巴仙。江志明也强调,该公司关注客工福利,包括确保客工宿舍宽敞、有设备齐全可自给自足的社区。 “每所宿舍都有健身房、室内和室外休闲设施、小型超市和食堂等。”他也表示,他们也准备一些正面的社区活动,如体育比赛、才艺表演、瑜伽、语言课等等。 他强调在疫情下业者仍继续协助客工住户、提供免费网络等,以满足他们心理和社交需求等。而疫情下也意味着该公司需作出调整,检讨宿舍的标准,但这都需要成本开销。 为此,他认为政府、雇主、宿舍经营者和广大社群对于成本的分摊应仔细考量。  …