Singapore Airlines Airbus A380-841 taxis around CDG Airport on March 29, 2010. Singapore Airlines is the flag carrier of Singapore. It was the launch customer of Airbus A380 from Shutterstock.com

The UK Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has today launched enforcement action against five major airlines, including Singapore Airlines (SIA) for denying passengers the compensation they are legally entitled to, for delayed flights.
The other airlines are American Airlines, Emirates, Etihad, and Turkish Airlines.
CAA stated that these airlines face enforcement action, after a CAA review found each of the airlines to be breaching consumer law, noting that the airlines had confirmed to the CAA they do not pay compensation to passengers.
“The airlines’ refusal to pay compensation in these instances fails to meet the legal passenger rights requirements for flight disruption,” it stressed.
Under European rules, passengers are legally entitled to compensation if they arrive at the final destination of their journey more than three hours late – including if booked on a connecting flight – unless the delay was due to extraordinary circumstances. These rights apply to any flight departing an EU airport, regardless of the nationality of the airline.
CAA stressed that this is an important issue for passengers, as it estimates that over 200,000 passengers each year travelling on these airlines could be at risk of missing their onward connection and thereby being delayed by over three hours at their final destination.
However, it noted that Singapore Airlines currently places compensation claims for these delays on hold.
Richard Moriarty, Director of Consumers and Markets at the CAA, said, “Any disruption to a flight is frustrating for passengers, but delays that cause people to miss connecting flights have a particularly damaging effect on people’s travel plans. That’s why there are clear laws in place to make sure passengers that experience this type of disruption are looked after by their airline and compensated when the disruption was in the airline’s control. ”
“Airlines’ first responsibility should be looking after their passengers, not finding ways in which they can prevent passengers upholding their rights. So it’s disappointing to see a small number of airlines continuing to let a number of their passengers down by refusing to pay them the compensation they are entitled to,” he stated.
‘Where we see evidence of passengers systematically being denied their rights, we will not hesitate to take the necessary action to ensure airlines change their policies and their customers get the assistance they are entitled to,” the Director added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

World’s strongest men stunned by female farmer in China

Trending in the Chinese social media network is a photo of a…

后港市镇会落实邻里更新计划 行动党前候选人“邀功”居民困惑

本月15日,工人党后港选区议员方荣发在脸书发文,表示其选区市镇理事会(TC)积极落实邻里更新计划(Neighbourhood Renewal Programme (NRP)),但是居民却收到和人民行动党前候选人李宏壮有关的宣传资料。 这令居民感到困惑,究竟后港选区的邻里更新计划由谁落实?毕竟后港的市镇会是由工人党管理。 对此方荣发提到,在2016年武吉巴督补选,行动党曾指出,如果候选人没有获得人民委托当选议员,那么他和他的政党也无法接管市镇会,也不能去进行上述计划。而市镇会在向政府申请拨款时可决定那些社区优先落实该计划。 当时,行动党补选候选人穆仁理也表示,邻里更新计划是由武吉巴督居民投选的代议士,所领导的市镇会执行。 方荣发更补充,即便是建屋发展局的官网,也有提及邻里更新计划是由市镇会进行。 于是一些后港居民质问,何以败选的行动党候选人,即没有领导市镇会,可以声言或暗示他参与邻里更新计划? 方荣发也问道:“行动党是否食言?还是这位候选人有所误解?如果行动党候选人即使没当选也可进行邻里更新计划,那么为何行动党在2016年武吉巴督补选时误导选民?” 他也强调,他自2012年以来就得到后港居民委托,管理市镇会,也会继续落实提升计划,但肯定不会参杂一些误导、分裂或混淆社区的政治套话。 在2016年,在武吉巴督补选中,穆仁理还宣布了总值190万新元的基础设施计划,但前提是他获得选民委托。…

How much of the Reserves has been really used?

by: Leong Sze Hian/ I refer to the article “Past reserves tapped…

Library Consultative Panel to help review library materials following “Penguingate”

By Howard Lee The National Library Board (NLB) has announced on 15…