A home owner was shocked to find stacks of sands in his flat dumped by HDB contractor, which were seemingly meant for his flat despite new regulations by HDB only to allow pre-packed screed for renovation.

As his Build-to-Order flat was purchased in 2012 without flooring, Jack (not his real name) appealed for a free screed from the Housing Development Board (HDB). His appeal succeeded and was scheduled for the flooring in late July to August.

HDB announced earlier that from 1 June 2015 onwards, pre-packed screed is to be used for renovation at “dry areas” such as living/dining rooms, bedrooms, storeroom, household shelter, etc. The new regulation was supposed to have taken place since December 2014 but was extended to allow more time for contractors to prepare for the changes.

When the HDB screed contractor called him around 9 July 2015 to arrange for the screed. Jack was told that the contractor had planned to screed his floor the following week and reserved the materials for him. Jack gave him the screed level and was delighted that the arrangement was going to happen earlier than he would have expected.

Jack had the impression that HDB had arranged for a smooth screed for his flooring with the cost factored in.

On 11 July 2015,  Jack had an appointment with his Interior Designer who wanted to view the empty flat for space planning. To his surprise, he saw four stacks of sand at home, in his three bedrooms and one living room.

20150711_152736

Jack soon caught a worker from the contracting company, outside his unit and he explained that his boss told him to unload the sand here. He was also told that for units requiring urgent screed, they will use sand and manual mix.

Jack tried to call the HDB contractor to no avail. However, the HDB contractor was there when he went down to level one and approached Jack.

He told Jack that it was a mistake of his workers as the sand was actually meant for a unit downstairs. He had communicated with the owner who told him that they wanted the screed urgently and has agreed to use the sand mix instead of pre-packed. The contractor then confirmed with Jack would like to have pre-packed screed instead of the sand mix that the latter affirmed.

After this brief encounter, Jack went back to his unit to carry on with his interior designer.

But to Jack’s surprise, another wheel-barrow of sand was unloaded despite his protest.

“I feedback this issue to HDB, but they can’t be bothered with it. No investigation took place on how many units were affected. No investigation on how much the contractor pocketed from using sand mix instead of prepacked.” said Jack

20150717_120522 (1)
The result flooring of Jack’s apartment

He added that the rest of the flooring seems completed because HDB complained that the flooring was too low and requested the main contractor to screed it up to required level after the screed contractor tried to use sand-mix cement. Thus, HDB main contractor had to screed it up to required level with prepacked screed and hand over to HDB.

“If you could zoom in the photos. You could see the crater in the center where the sand was. Then around it some lumps and bumps done by HDB.” said Jack

20150702_143117
Photo of the main con prepacked and surrounding floor

In his feedback to HDB, he wrote, “However I am concerned about the other units that were contracted by this contractor since 1st June 2015. As I had personally met this contractor whilst they were dumping sand into my unit, he admitted that there were other units being screeded with sandmix instead of premix compound. I was told that for certain urgent cases, under the agreement of the home owners, he would proceed and screed with sand mix instead of premix. As for my home, it was an unfortunate mistake by his workers, as the sand was meant for a unit in the lower floors.”

Jack added, “I am aware that HDB no longer provides free screeding but instead as a gesture of goodwill. As much as I thank the gesture, HDB is not a private organisation where the funds comes from foregin investors or appropiate investment strategies, but a board set up to provide affordable housing to Singaporeans. Please duly ensure that while on one hand you increase the cost of home owners and renovation contractors due to the use of premix, you do not shoot your foot by having your own contractors use sandmix.”

feedback to HDB

Local media had earlier reported contractors saying that the new rule will drive up renovation costs by about $2 to $3 per square foot, with some estimating that the increased total could be as much as $3,000.

Below is the reply that HDB sent to Jack.

Screenshot_2015-07-16-19-01-51

When pressed for an account, Jack was only told by the HDB officer that more checks will take place and that their instructions sufficed as a measure.

Jack said, “I feel that this reflects their attitude in handling their job, resulting in multiple defects from recent BTO which they try to play down as aesthetics. Having no proper checks and measures in place, it is not a surprise such lapses occurs. They had also failed to account to Singaporeans, as an agency to provide affordable quality housing to Singaporeans.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

受电子产品出货量下滑影响 , 我国出口连续七个月衰退

受电子产品出货量持续下滑,官方数据昨日(17日)显示,我国出口连续七个月衰退。 新加坡企业发展局(Enterprise Singapore, ESG)数据显示,主要受到电子产品出货减锐24.8巴仙影响,9月份非石油出口较去年同期的下滑8.1巴仙。经季节性调整后,出口按月跌3.3巴仙,反观8月则增加6.7巴仙。 电子产品则主要受到集体电路(30.2巴仙)、电脑(33.1)以及磁盘产品(12.2巴仙)的缩水,导致出货量下滑。 而非电子产品出口在9月份也比起前一个月出现下滑的现象,下降了2.3巴仙。其中受到制药、石油化工和珠宝的影响最多。 整体而言,我国大部分主要市场的出口均在9月份出现下滑现象,9月份的贸易总额同比下降4.9巴仙,而8月份同比下降则达8.6巴仙。 其中对欧盟、美国及日本出口,分别降17.3巴仙、10.9巴仙、19.2巴仙。

涉嫌诈欺足总逾63万元 足总前副总监夫妇遭提控

涉嫌诈诈欺新加坡足球总会高达63万新元资金,包括一名足总前副总监(deputy director)等四名新加坡人,今日(9日)被提控上庭。 根据新加坡贪污调查局文告,40岁的里甘日星(Rikram Jit Singh Randhir Singh),以及妻子艾莎(Asya Kirin Kames)被提控合谋诈欺足总,让足总把业务判给里甘妻子的公司。夫妇俩为此面对多达45项诈欺控状。 里甘日星在2016年至2018年期间,在足总旗下担任商业与业务发展副总监,他的工作合约在2019年1月到期。 至于他33岁的妻子艾莎,在2017年4月至10月期间,在体育休闲用品批发公司All Resource…

Section 377A meant to curb male prostitution, not consensual sex

By Ariffin Sha After a 4-year legal battle to have the case…

痛批国大偷拍事件 AWARE:揭示更深层体制问题

针对近日闹得沸沸扬扬的国大偷拍事件,妇女行动与研究协会(AWARE)对受害者马芸(Monica Baey)所发生的不幸事件感到悲痛,亦不满校方及警方在此事对涉事者的惩处。 AWARE 是本地性别平权组织之一。该协会指出,他们已接触并为马芸的身心状况提供相关协助。协会也赞许马芸在受创期间,仍勇于表达被不公平对待的无畏精神。 优先受害者安全、调查透明化 AWARE强调,校方应在事件发生后,优先考量受害者及其他学生安全、采取对各造都公平的措施,且调查检讨过程需透明。 AWARE阐明:近来备受世界关注的反性骚扰运动(#MeToo)运动强调,社会应对性骚扰议题有更高的警觉性与辨识,而所有高等学院不应该再各行其事,必须振作起来打击性骚扰案件。 #MeToo运动是经历2017年哈维. 韦恩斯坦性骚扰事件后在社交媒体上广泛传播的一个主题标签(hashtag),用于谴责性侵犯与性骚扰行为。 该运动经推特(Twitter)广传后,数百万人使用了这一标签公开自己不快经历,也快速传至亚洲国家如:中国、韩国、日本、台湾,纷纷使用对应标签及母语响应活动。 AWARE呼吁对应类似案件,社会应给予更多的同理心与恻隐之心,协助受害者伸张正义。除了认同对性骚扰应予以更严厉的惩罚,协会也提及不公义并非仅限来自于加害者,也不能忽视更深沉的体制问题。 *AWARE声明原文点此。