moeBy Howard Lee

There was a time where parents will send their children to a school because it excelled in a certain sport of co-curricular activity (CCA).

Not anymore, as schools begin to scale back the School-Based Excellence initiative, to be replaced by “programmes that focus more on learning opportunities rather than achievements”, reported media.

The Programme for School-Based Excellence (PSE) for primary schools was introduced in 2005 to help schools to develop their strengths and niche areas.

“This is to encourage the schools to offer a diverse range of programmes to provide students with more opportunities to grow in different areas of excellence, and enrich their educational experience,” said the Ministry of Education (MOE) in an earlier media release. “Through their niche programmes, schools also develop in their students various skills such as teamwork, communication and creativity.”

Primary schools that successfully applied for the scheme will receive a recurrent grant of up to S$100,000 per year per school, with the purpose of further raising the quality and outreach of these initiatives.

Schools apparently need to continually chalk up performance records in these niche areas in order to maintain the grant.

The PSE was also meant to be a way for schools to develop their own strengths, but the scheme also created problems for parents, as CCAs and programmes that do not contribute to the PSE initiative were often not given much, if any, attention by the respective schools.

As such, while initially touted as an initiative that “enables the schools to develop different areas of excellence and provide more opportunities for our students”, the initiative seems to have fallen short in providing such opportunities, at least for all students.

singapore-studentsMOE confirmed with media that as of last year, primary schools in Singapore have begun transiting to Learning for Life and Applied Learning programmes, which MOE had unveiled in 2013 for secondary schools to create “a colourful landscape of distinctive schools to choose from”, as then noted by Education Minister Heng Swee Keat.

The PSE was announced at the MOE Work Plan Seminar 2004 on 29 September 2004 by Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam, then the Education Minister.

Over the next few years, the PSE scheme will be gradually phased out from the entire education system.

It is not clear, however, if the “replacement” programmes” would serve the same purpose a PSE, or if they would be in the same tune of developing specialised CCAs for schools and students.

The Applied Learning programme emphases on developing thinking skills, connecting knowledge across subject disciplines, stretching the imagination and applying these in authentic settings in society and industries, with the intent of helping students “appreciate the relevance and value of what they are learning in the academic curriculum and develop stronger motivation and purpose to acquire knowledge and skills”.

The Learning for Life programme aims to provide students with real-life experiential learning to develop their character and values, cultivate positive attitudes, self expression and strengthen their people skills.

Learning for Life is integral to Character and Citizenship Education (CCE), which encourages in students a sense of rootedness and responsibility for their community and fellow Singaporeans. Activities might include outdoor adventure learning, sports, student leadership development, uniformed groups, performing and visual arts.

However, what the phasing out of the PSE scheme seems to be aligned with is the concept of “every school a good school”, a motto that has been close to Mr Heng’s term as Education Minister.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP’s climate change policy paper: Taking urgent measures towards a smart and green future

On 8 February, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) launched its climate change…

Speech – Chained to Our Roots

Speech by Teresa Teo Guttensohn at Hong Lim Park Event – Chained…

Protests continue as Indonesia president Jokowi receives final draft of job creation law

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — After being rocked by the three-day mass protests against…

揶揄《海时》选择性报导 郑庆顺批评登加新镇投稿被无视

新加坡国立大学建筑系客座教授郑庆顺,于两年前曾撰文批评登加新镇的开发,乃是对国内珍稀森林地不必要的破坏,并把文章投稿给《海峡时报》,惟后者并没有将之刊登。 郑庆顺是在昨日,依网友Tann Chee的要求,向他展示主流媒体如何对不符合官方论述的消息,选择性报导。 他在脸书揭露两年前,曾致函给《海峡时报》,稿件誌期2016年10月27日,文中批评批评登加新镇的发展,是对宝贵天然森林地不必要的破坏。 郑庆顺揶揄,也许是担心他的稿件内容会让建屋发展局和市区重建局(URA)“显得愚蠢”,所以《海时》才没有将之刊登出来。 郑庆顺是对登加新镇的发展,提出他的忧虑。他指出,住宅本就是社会政治课题。首先必须考量登加新镇是否符合社经需求? “其一,年长者希望现有组屋保值,年轻选民则希望房屋价格可负担。很显然登加新镇是面向年轻选民,而不是针对想为资产保值的年长者。” 人口拥堵也是值得关注的课题,更多外国人涌入,可能提升房产价值。补贴可以减轻年轻人买房压力,也为旧组屋保值,当然也需要反向抵押贷款等金融配套的辅助。不过,郑庆顺更为关心,如果登加新镇仅仅是面向年轻人,会否有违理想的家庭空间关系? 登加新镇的开发,志在把森林城镇化,间中有森林公园贯穿整个城镇。但郑庆顺并不太苟同这类概念。 应避免在绿地搞建设 郑庆顺认为,在绿地搞建设,可免则免。他在个人录制的Youtube视频《新加坡2.0版本》,就提到当港口迁移到大士后,西起班丹蓄水池,东至滨海东(Marina East),就腾出了足以容纳一百万人口的发展用地。…