Wednesday, 27 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

Tuition in Singapore: A Different Perspective

Image by ST
Image by ST

By Darrell Tan

My parents and I were featured in the Sunday Times on the 21st of December 2014. Asiaone placed the article online.

While the article spoke about rather straightforward issues such as the fear of failure embedded in the minds of Singaporean students, reasons why we set up Edhome Learning Centre and how we worked together to set up this tuition business, it left out my responses to the tough questions the reporter posed.

She asked why I left the service if I had a passion for teaching, whether I was adding to the pressure that students faced by contributing to this “tuition culture” in Singapore and how I felt about our education scene and the tuition industry.

My response to these questions left me rather concerned about how controversial the article might have turned out, and while I do appreciate how the article was positively written and how my family was accurately portrayed concerning our values and beliefs, I feel compelled to speak up in with my response to the tough questions raised during the interview and other pertinent issues that have been deeply bothering me because of how one-sided the portrayals have been on tuition and education.

In recent years, the impressions of the tuition industry have been more negative than positive. A reported 1 billion dollars spent on tuition per year, a feature of super -tutors and subsequent reports on how much certain tutors earn seemed to add up to a conclusion that private tuition is just a profit-making industry.

Tuition has also been reported to perpetuate a “kiasu culture” in Singapore, adding to competition and the resultant stress heaped on our youth. Among these reports on tuition as a social phenomenon are the occasional reports on errant tutors falsifying qualifications and making false promises leading to the public and even MPs demanding for more scrutiny on the industry.


Why teachers leave to become tutors

Why do good teachers leave the service if they claim “teaching is their calling”?

Definitely, there are some teachers who feel underpaid and leave, thinking that becoming a tutor would earn them more money. I am not speaking for these ex-teachers; neither do I think they ought to be viewed negatively.

Reality is that many teachers are in the service because teaching makes a good and stable first job and they are able to deliver decent lessons. If money and a better life serve as reasons for leaving, it’s basically the same as anyone in any profession leaving because the grass is greener on the other side.

When we leave the service and end up in the tuition industry, it is with huge reluctance and much sadness that we leave, and it is not because of the money.

Firstly, even these passionate teachers get disillusioned. The teachers aren’t disillusioned with educating our youth, definitely not with the classroom.

We are disillusioned with obstacles that lie in the way of real education –education that works, education that produces results AND at the same time develops character, encourages meaningful relationships and lead to real success (contentment and happiness!) down the road.

Often times, this might be the result of circumstances within the school they are in – departments comfortable with keeping the norm, leaders who undermine the enthusiasm of young teachers, superiors who breathe down their necks and restrict creativity (and potential) or simply, injustice, politics or nasty people.

Sometimes,it is the result of human weakness. It takes two hands to clap and these passionate, caring, good teachers make mistakes.

My point here, is that yes, these teachers do leave because of circumstances at that point of time, but their hearts have never abandoned that desire to nurture and guide students to the best of their ability and we enter into tutoring,desiring to do just that.

But what pains my heart to observe, is how we are no longer viewed as educators with a sincere desire to impact and nurture young lives, but instead, as profiteering individuals sometimes representing a profit-driven organization.

I suppose, with huge tuition companies setting up multiple branches and attracting millions of dollars in investments, tutors are automatically associated with wanting to have a piece of the billion dollar pie.


The cost of Tuition

People forget that tutors need to survive. We too, suffer from a high cost of living and for those who own a small tuition centre like me, the overheads are high and we are struggling to cover cost.

The windows for lessons are so limited, usually to evenings, or weekends. Along with some tutors, I’ve spent hours reading through materials from various schools and learning centres, gathering what works best, putting them together with the methods I find the most useful and packaging them into fresh notes.

That is followed by doing up presentations and continual contemplation over what OTHER approaches or teaching methods would best benefit my students.

Why does tuition seem to cost $200-300 for mere 8 hours of group tuition or up to $100 per hour for 1 to 1 tuition?

Ideally because so much more is done behind the scenes to make sure the child receives the best in that 1.5 to 2 hours a week. That is not considering the hours spent thereafter marking work, giving feedback or lessons specially crafted for students of those 1 to 1assignments.


Scrutiny of the Tuition Industry

Parents and students need to understand what is being done IN a tuition class, talk to the tutors at length, or even request to sit in to observe for part of a lesson.

I know of tutors who would charge high prices just to get tutees to do work on the spot and ask them questions. I was shocked when my students told me that that was being done, and that several tutors do just that.

Further, there are many tutors as well, who would work for a centre, and basically deliver a lesson based on the curriculum the centre provides. There is sometimes no real understanding of the lesson they are delivering and hence,effectiveness of those lessons is compromised. In fact, that is how many schoolteachers function – deliver a lesson found in the department folder or get students to ‘do work in class and ask questions when they need to’.

Good teachers, in or out of the government service, in the school classrooms or intuition centres, will possess a deep understanding of the lessons delivered and endeavor to do so in the best possible way.

Most of the time, if not all, these teachers will repackage curriculum to improve it, and fit it to their styles of delivery according to the profiles of their students. That is what all teachers and tutors should try their best to do regardless of experience or position.

That has to be what parents are paying for in tuition – a good lesson, created with commitment, and delivered with heart. Only THAT justifies the prices they are paying for what seems like a mere 1.5 to 2 hours of class time.


Tuition and ‘Stress’

Good tutors are not necessarily miracle workers. All these promises of guaranteed results are often just marketing gimmicks and should not be the main focus.

For every A1 or A star produced, another tutee probably got a B or a C. What is put up as marketing material is often selective and must be taken with a pinch of salt.

An excellent lesson may result in students understanding those particular concepts taught within that particular lesson.

But a passionate and committed tutor does more than that. Students potentially come out of lessons encouraged, motivated and determined to achieve much more on their own, on top of understanding what was taught.

On a side note, I believe students should not be forced to attend tuition, especially if they insist it is not of use.

It is tough enough for young people to spend mandatory hours in school for half a day, 5 days a week. It is harder for them to drag their feet into yet another classroom (where some disinterested tutors teach on monotonously).

Tuition under these circumstances will only lead to more stress, fatigue and  wasted time and money. It is fair however, for students’ to be encouraged to give tuition classes a try to see if it works for them.

What happens then, if students attend tuition? Do teachers then feel they are not good enough? Why can’t we be more open and acknowledge that everyone can potentially work together to help these young people?

Many a times, students attend tuition and find that something clicks and everything suddenly makes sense. That in itself is extremely stress-relieving. Sometimes,students find suitable approaches to problem-solving because tutors have more time to specially craft lessons that suit their learning styles and profiles. That gives students the confidence to learn on in school.

When a student discovers how his individuality and uniqueness (in writing) helps him to glow among standard essay responses,he is motivated to exercise more creativity in his work.



Working together: parents, teachers, students and tutors

Let’s credit anything or anyone who helps young people learn better, more enthusiastically and more happily. It always seems as though tuition is something in excess,something more, and something that is an added burden to the already heavy academic load.

Can’t tutors be seen as concerned stakeholders alongside parents, teachers and the student themselves instead of being perceived as‘extra’ or someone opportunistic and eager to make money from students in need or desperate parents?

Perhaps then, tuition wouldn’t be seen as ‘added pressure’. When and if we recognize the ways to which good tuition can unlock or broaden minds, inspire or encourage hearts, then perhaps we would be able to see how tuition can potentially relieve stress instead.

All that huge potential that tuition has to impact lives starts with tutors doing their very best. In this dynamically changing society, tutors need to commit themselves to continuous upgrading. Perhaps the Ministry should conduct workshops to update tutors with new curriculum or assist in helping us grow and become better educators too.

The time and effort tutors put in needs to justify the cost of the lessons. Tuition is not meant to be an easy job, or an easy way out to a good life.

Sadly speaking, there will always be tutors out there in it purely for the money. That’s where parents and students need  their right and spend effort to find out more, to have in-depth conversations with tutors, to find out their ideas, beliefs and motivations, to get to know them.

Request to sit in to classes. Speak to these tutors (some who have never been teachers but may not necessarily be bad tutors), understand them, make sure your child is not attending an ‘extra’ lesson, but a lesson that will potentially add as much value or more than classes in school. More importantly, observe if your child grows in character and values after attending these tuition classes.

There are so many stereotypes and false impressions of the tuition industry that have shaped parents’ and students’ attitudes towards tutors and tuition. My hope is that parents, students and the public-at-large will step back and re-evaluate these generalizations.

It is important to remember that many tutors out there are still devoted teachers at heart and are not just profiteering ex-teachers.

I hope this open letter encourages committed-teachers-turn-tutors out there to persevere and continue doing their best for young people.

There are several successful tutor-mentors we can all learn from, and perhaps it is just about that small step we should take to ask.

And to those dollar-focused tutors or tuition businesses, I think it’s time to reflect and rethink motivations. The education industry is unlike any other. There are young lives at stake, and it cannot just be about the money.

The original article was first published at Darrell Tan’s facebook account

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts