LTAforum

A letter posted in the Straits Times forum, entitled ” Surcharge spurs cabs to go into CBD, says LTA”

Written by the director of Media Relations from LTA, Ms Helen Lim. She mentions that taxi companies have implemented a city area surcharge that is payable on trips originating from within the Central Business District (CBD), from Monday to Saturday during the peak periods between 5pm and midnight, but it does not seem to be so in reality.

The Land Transportation Authority (LTA)’s site states that the City Area Surcharge of $3.00 is from 5:00 PM to Midnight, Monday to Sunday & Public Holidays. She might have confused the days with the rule on when the taxi drivers cannot pick up or alight passengers at the CBD area from the bus lanes that are in operation from 7.30AM to 8PM, Monday to Saturday except Sunday & Public Holidays.

Apart from this minor mistake, the letter fails to explain how the surcharge will encourage taxi drivers to enter the CBD area in comparison to the suggestion made by Mr Tan to reduce the ERP rates for taxis.
Instead of encouraging taxi drivers to enter the CBD as the basis of its implementation, it serves primarily as a subsidy to the taxi driver for having to drive into an ERP controlled area  to pick up his/her passengers.
In other words, simply passing the cost over to the customer to have the taxi enter the CBD.

And it might be wrong to say that taxi should be subjected to ERP charges because like all other cars, they occupy space and therefore contribute to congestion. Taxis in Singapore are considered as public form of transportation and used by the general public to travel from one place to another. Has there been any research or study whether taxis contribute to the bulk of the congestion in the CBD areas to justify the need to have ERP charges applied to them using the rational of LTA? And whether will taxis relieve the congestion in CBD by increasing dependency on taxis for transportation instead of owning a personal car?

If taxis could be made more readily available by reducing the ERP charges to entice them to enter CBD area to search for customers, and also lower the cost involved in hailing a cab in the CBD area. Why not?

Is there a definitive proof that ERP reduce congestion in the city area or have people learnt to live with the ERP charges?

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

碧山地铁站出现确诊患者 SMRT称已彻底清洗与消毒

碧山地铁站被发现出现确诊患者,一名58岁本地妇女确诊感染冠状并19,SMRT公司表示,已彻底进行清洗与消毒。 据SMRT表示,该名确诊本地妇女为地铁环线的服务大使,妇女在17日时出现身体不适,随后去求诊,被转介接受拭子测试,同日确诊感染。她最后一次上班时间为上周五15日。 根据卫生部公布的资料显示,该名妇女与其他病例并无关联,而目前她所接触过的地方也进行了彻底清洗与消毒。 SMRT环线主管何福星也表示,公司自1月底开始已增加对于站内、设施和车辆等高接触点的清洁频率。至于患者,目前情况稳定,公司也正密切关注他的情况并给予其家属必要的支援。

Bringing a little bit of reality to debate on the death penalty

NOTE: The writer is a founding member of We Believe in Second…

Nigerian national set to be hanged at dawn tomorrow for trafficking of Cannabis after Apex Court dismisses last ditch appeal

Chijoke Stephan Obioha, a Nigerian graduate who first came to Singapore for…

MOM bars intra-corporate transferees from bringing in family members; those under CECA exempted

It was reported in the media today that since 2 months ago…