It was reported in the media today that since 2 months ago (Nov 2020), the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has started drawing a clear line between foreigners working in Singapore as intra-corporate transferees (ICT) and those working here on employment pass (EP) (‘MOM clarifies differences between ICT, other EP holders‘, 11 Jan).

Foreign employees of multinational corporations who are posted to the company’s Singapore branch as an ICT can no longer bring their family members with them via dependant’s passes or long-term visit passes. That is to say, their family members can no longer apply for dependant’s or long-term visit passes.

However, ICTs do enjoy an advantage. According to MOM’s website, the advertising requirement on the national Jobs Bank under the Fair-Consideration Framework (FCF) does not apply to jobs to be filled by ICTs.

“However, to be exempted, the Employment Pass candidate would have to meet the stringent definition of ICTs under the World Trade Organisation’s (WTO) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), or any applicable free trade agreements to which Singapore is party,” MOM said.

Under WTO GATS, an ICT must be in one of these roles: Manager, Executive or Specialist. Additionally, under WTO GATS, an ICT must have worked for the company outside Singapore for at least 1 year before being posted to Singapore. ICTs can also work in Singapore for up to 5 years.

In response to media enquiries with regard to its latest restriction, a MOM spokesperson added, “An ICT is also generally not eligible for future employment in Singapore upon the expiry/termination of his/her work pass, or for permanent residency.”

The number of ICTs in Singapore has consistently been below 5 per cent of all EP holders in Singapore, the Ministry of Trade and Industry said last year.

ICTs via CECA not restricted in bringing in family members

The new restriction on ICTs bringing in their family members under dependant’s or long-term visit passes, however, would not apply to a country that has a free trade agreement (FTA) with Singapore that allows them to bring their families along.

Indeed, under the India-Singapore Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) signed between Singapore and India, ICTs can apply for dependant’s or long-term visit passes for their family members to come to Singapore, subject to prevailing criteria.

Not only they can live in Singapore, they can work here too. Under the section on “MOVEMENT OF NATURAL PERSONS” of CECA, the agreement states:

Also, the ICT rules for CECA are more relaxed than those under WTO GATS. Under CECA, ICTs can work in the foreign country for up to 8 years instead of 5.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
49 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】李显扬发长文《品格与勇气》 质问是否仍要拥护行动党“天生贵族”机制?

前进党成员、建国总理李光耀次子李显扬,自宣布加入前进党后,经常公开呼吁人民支持在野党。尽管在此次大选中未参与任何的竞选,但在竞选期间亦频频现身前进党候选人的选区,以示对前进党的支持。 他亦于今早(5日)以中、英和马来文三语,发表长文声援前进党,除了赞许在野党候选人是为民发声的人,同时也比较在野党候选人与人民行动党候选人,指如今的国会已然成为官员谋取更高职位的垫脚石,非为人民发声之地,质问人民是否应该继续拥护人民行动党“天生贵族”的机制。 “这个大选年,新加坡涌现了许多可靠和能干的在野党选人。这群候选人不但有爱心,而且也很真实。他们拥有高尚的品格与资历。更重要的是,他们已全力以赴准备为新加坡国人,无畏地表达他们的需求。“ “与他们相反的,正正是苍白无色的PAP竞选人。对他们而言,国会只是谋取更高官职的垫脚石。纸上文凭和多年来的塑造粉饰,是否造就了更优秀或更强大的领袖?人民行动党(PAP)系统是否有助加强4G领袖的表现?我们是否还要继续拥护PAP的“天生贵族”机制?” 在野党的困境VS人民行动党的一帆风顺 李显扬也提及在野党候选人近年来所面对的困境,经常面对不公平对待与人格抹黑,甚至是亲友的打击,但他也表示,在野党候选人无所畏惧,因为他们关心的是国家的未来,因此相当佩服他们的勇气。 “相对于成为人民行动党(PAP)的候选人,成为反对党候选人需要品格和勇气,后者体现的是为国家牺牲的意愿。反对党候选人经常成为不公平对待、人格抹黑的受害者,而且也必须面对亲朋戚友的打击。然而,这些候选人选择站出来,为全民追求公正与平等。他们选择为人民发声,因为他们关心我们国家的未来。” 反观,他指出,人民行动党国会议员的政途一帆风顺,甚至可以进入内阁,或获得高薪职位。 “PAP国会议员的政途都一帆风顺,有者获得进入内阁、有者获得非常高薪的政治职位,而另一些则获颁董事职位及各种其它职位。” 李显扬:自己检查自己是行不通的 此外,他也阐述两者在国会上的立场,形容人民行动党,因党鞭(Party whip)的推动与对党的义务,加上各种回报,因此根据党的指示投票是意料中事,反观在野党会质疑一些不受欢迎的政策,并合理质询,避免出现滥权。他也提及各在野党候选人如前进党秘书长陈清木医生、工人党等。…

New venue for protests

Read also – “Court reserves judgement on appeal by 3 SDP members”…

WP launches manifesto urging “compassionate and equitable growth”

The Workers’ Party launched a 46-page manifesto on Sunday containing key proposals such…

Prices of HDB flats – press censorship?

See Leong Kit’s letter questioning HDB’s pricing formula rejected by Today.