LTAforum

A letter posted in the Straits Times forum, entitled ” Surcharge spurs cabs to go into CBD, says LTA”

Written by the director of Media Relations from LTA, Ms Helen Lim. She mentions that taxi companies have implemented a city area surcharge that is payable on trips originating from within the Central Business District (CBD), from Monday to Saturday during the peak periods between 5pm and midnight, but it does not seem to be so in reality.

The Land Transportation Authority (LTA)’s site states that the City Area Surcharge of $3.00 is from 5:00 PM to Midnight, Monday to Sunday & Public Holidays. She might have confused the days with the rule on when the taxi drivers cannot pick up or alight passengers at the CBD area from the bus lanes that are in operation from 7.30AM to 8PM, Monday to Saturday except Sunday & Public Holidays.

Apart from this minor mistake, the letter fails to explain how the surcharge will encourage taxi drivers to enter the CBD area in comparison to the suggestion made by Mr Tan to reduce the ERP rates for taxis.
Instead of encouraging taxi drivers to enter the CBD as the basis of its implementation, it serves primarily as a subsidy to the taxi driver for having to drive into an ERP controlled area  to pick up his/her passengers.
In other words, simply passing the cost over to the customer to have the taxi enter the CBD.

And it might be wrong to say that taxi should be subjected to ERP charges because like all other cars, they occupy space and therefore contribute to congestion. Taxis in Singapore are considered as public form of transportation and used by the general public to travel from one place to another. Has there been any research or study whether taxis contribute to the bulk of the congestion in the CBD areas to justify the need to have ERP charges applied to them using the rational of LTA? And whether will taxis relieve the congestion in CBD by increasing dependency on taxis for transportation instead of owning a personal car?

If taxis could be made more readily available by reducing the ERP charges to entice them to enter CBD area to search for customers, and also lower the cost involved in hailing a cab in the CBD area. Why not?

Is there a definitive proof that ERP reduce congestion in the city area or have people learnt to live with the ERP charges?

Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

外交部:不允国外政治活动 韩国瑜妻李佳芬访狮城行程取消

今日(26日)新加坡外交部发文告表示,我国政府不允许国外的政治活动在我国进行,包括竞选和募款活动,且对所有方面人士都奉行一致政策,要求任何到我国的访客都要遵守我国法律。 事缘台湾国民党总统参选人韩国瑜的妻子李佳芬,原定25日至28日出访东南亚新马印三国,不过昨日抵达印尼后却突然取消新加坡行程。 韩国瑜竞选办公室较后解释,由于新加坡政府高度关注涉及政治议题聚会,且也有维安和警力安排工作考量,所以只得暂缓前来新加坡的行程。 2020年台湾总统大选临近,李佳芬也代表丈夫出访,试图争取海外台侨支持。她将在短短三日行程中拜访印尼和马来西亚。此前在17日至20日已前往柬埔寨和曼谷参观台商工厂。 据了解,在印尼雅加达的活动上,有当地侨胞穿着“青天白日满地红”中华民国旗帜式样T恤,迎接李佳芬。

Face to Face: Opposition Supporters Anonymous

The following is a letter from a member of the audience at…

Good Samaritans in Singapore help cancer patient to obtain masks

On Monday (2 March), Redditor mellowminister (MM) updated a post that he…

Total prize pool of S$360,000, attractive publishing contracts await indie game developers at ‘Storm the World 2021’ competition

Storms, a game publisher and social gaming community app, has announced the…