~ By Phillip Ang ~

I understand PUB's predicament as a result of inclement weather but totally disagree with the planned usage of $750 million for upgrading. After having submitted numerous feedback reports on the state of our drainage system, there has been no assurance as to my emphasis on the need for proper maintenance, and the PUB has yet to take the necessary steps to ensure drainage inlets are free from blockage.

I am a keen observer and travel to different parts of Singapore, and my recent observations seem to suggest that the replies from PUB has not been followed with concrete action.

Along Dunearn Road and other places, many drainage inlets were observed to be choked with so much hardened sand that there is no more room for leaves to pass through.

Meanwhile, closer to my home, it is not uncommon to see such 'green' gratings.

And along East Coast Road, there is more of the same.

All these examples and thousands more like them resulted from months and years of neglect. The causes could be insufficient budget allocated to get things properly done, foreign workers who have been overworked by money-minded contractors and civil servants who are not in touch with the reality on the ground.

The government must conduct its own checks through an independent third party as it has been status quo with PUB for too long. With some 30,000 grassroots leaders vounteering their time for various initiatives, this could be executed without much complexity. Students on vacation are another alternative and their contribution and effort could be recognised through Community Involvement Programme (CIP) points. Motorists caught in jams could take note through casual observation and filter the feedback back to the authority, as could pedestrians.

It is prudent to note that existing drainage inlets complement new ones being installed, and installing swanky new drains without maintenance of the existing drainage network, is simply throwing the money down the proverbial drain. For the entire system to function smoothly, blockage has to be eliminated or minimised first. Unfortunately, PUB has been unable to ensure this even after much feedback.

_______________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

TCMR report should consider rats situation in estates

On Thursday, 29 January, 2015, the following letter was published in the…

Importer fined $3,600 for illegal import of fresh vegetables and processed food

LHH Vegetable Pte Ltd was fined a total of $3,600 by the…

PSA Marine worker found dead near Riau island

A Singaporean man who was reported to be missing after falling during…

总理起诉许渊臣 林鼎将担任辩护律师

针对新加坡总理李显龙起诉本社总编许渊臣,林鼎将担任后者的辩护律师。预计聆讯将在下月30日进行至12月4日。 2019年9月5日,本社总编收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中,对本社英语站发表《总理夫人何晶奇怪地分享了一篇与家人断绝关系》的文章,总理提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 去年9月27日,许渊臣提呈答辩书。许渊臣认为内容是复述李总理弟妹的话,并不具诽谤性质。 林鼎在今日在脸书公开讲作为本社总编辩护律师的消息,指出他赞赏许渊臣和《网络公民》作为独立媒体的工作,也强调替代媒体作为民主制度中第四权的重要。正是这类替代媒体能确保有权势和社会精英能继续接受问责。 许渊臣则表示,由于面对许多法律技术层面的挑战,不得已而寻求律师id协助。他也担忧总理的律师在审讯时挑起法律上的失误,为此需要有一名代表。此前,许一直在审讯中为自己辩护。 除了许渊臣,林鼎律师也代表时评人梁实轩,在面对总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护。 I…