by: Neo Swee Lin/


In 1987, 22 people were detained without trial under the ISA under Operation Spectrum – “a security operation which saw 22 young Roman Catholic church and social activists and professionals detained, without trial, under the internal security law, accused of being members of an alleged Marxist conspiracy bent on subverting the PAP-ruled government by force, and replacing it with a Marxist state” (see HERE).

I just want some soft words for those who were so unjustly mistreated in 1987, and the Presidential candidates should give me some peace, in that if you’re elected, would you be protecting us the citizens if something like this happened again?

Is it too much to expect? The government is never going to apologize or admit any wrong. Could the candidates now as part of their campaign for Presidency give the people some kind of simple show of compassion and hope?

An excerpt from much anticipated The Online Citizen interview with Dr Tan Cheng Bock reads:

“When asked whether he still feels the ‘Marxist conspirators’ are guilty, Dr Tan says with a tone of sincerity, “I really feel they are innocent. They are all social workers and they meant well but unfortunately…(trails off)”
He adds, “I saw the ex-detainees and I really do feel for them. But at that time I believed the information that was given to me.”

Unfortunately the video interview does not show this at all. In fact what Dr Tan says in the video is:

“this is a very sensitive subject… ” and “when all this appeared on the net, I was told to be very careful”

TOLD??? TOLD BY WHOM?

I posted a question on Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s Facebook page, I asked:

“Dr Tan, with respect, there is a question that is burning in my mind and I guess I should just ask it. Knowing what you know today, would you have acted differently with regard to the so-called Marxist Conspirators of 1987? would you heed David Marshall’s call to “save the innocent Teo Soh Lung & Kevin De Souza?”

My question was ignored and eventually deleted from his page. It makes me want to ignore and delete him too.

Friends, I’m just trying to figure out who to vote as our next President.

Someone said on my FB, “you mean you even considered voting for Dr Tony Tan?” Yes, actually I did. But not now. Not after watching him speak on videos – he is so terribly uninspiring and not as sweet as he looks in pictures. Moving pictures tell a different story, he scares the hell out of me actually. And certainly not after the shameless plugging of the Straits Times, beginning with the endorsement by our Prime Minister.

Now I am looking for an alternative. And to everyone’s surprise, Tan Jee Say has got his Certificate of Entitlement. Also I’m not sure if its the savvy “I know how to campaign” Dr Tan Cheng Bock yet.

My dad met Dr Tan Cheng Bock in church few weeks ago, and said he was going to vote for him. But he has now changed his mind, on his own accord!

Teo Soh Lung was right. Change has begun.

Four eligibles for the Elected Presidency. Who would’ve thought we would see the day. People are saying so and so should step down so as not to split the vote etc. I don’t think anyone should give way to anyone else. There is something I learnt from one of my characters in “cooling off day“.

I will not vote according to who I think stands a chance or not. I will not vote in a politically savvy way. I will vote with my heart, my mind, my soul. It is my vote, and it is precious.


Neo Swee Lin first posted this note on her Facebook. TOC thanks Ms Neo for allowing TOC to reproduce the edited version here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【武汉冠状病毒】英国卫生副部长也中招! 还曾和首相出席活动

目前,英国已有383例武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,就连当地卫生副部长多丽斯(Nadine Dorries)也未能幸免于难,本身也在昨日发文告证实自己受感染。 据了解62岁的多丽斯,还在上周四(5日)与英国首相约翰逊(Boris Johnson),出席三八妇女节活动。 多丽斯在上周五签署推动应对疫情的立法,就出现不适症状,并在周末期间出现干咳、发热等病征。 英国当地医疗机关已启动追踪机制,追查曾与多里斯接触的人士。据英国媒体报导,迄今仍未知多丽斯在何处感染病毒,后者已进行自我隔离。 迄今英国的累计死亡病例多达六人,最新一例死者是80多岁男子,本身患有其他疾病。

Singaporeans need to be more empathetic towards the current political turmoil in Malaysia, says NUS’s Assoc Prof

Today (3 March), Associate Professor of political science at the National University…

鄞义林赞我国疫情应对表现佳 欠缺人民参与度为一大纰漏

旅台部落客兼维权人士鄞义林,赞扬我国在此次应对武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)的表现,认同当局采取非常好的应对策略,并对策划者提早拟定对策表示佩服,只是他指出我国政府没有顾及人民的策略参与度,甚至指责人民没有“纪律”,遗憾成为一大败笔。 昨早(13日)在脸书上帖文,赞扬我国的医疗系统在应对冠毒疫情上,采取了非常好的设施,并相信有参与策略者,如他的前上司国家传染病中心临床主任、高级顾问医生苏安·华素(Shawn Vasoo)以及主任梁玉心,对他们的表现由衷敬佩。 医疗措施纰漏或增患者压力 他指出,建议诊所医生给患有呼吸道症状的患者五天病假,向永久居民和公民收取低廉费用;或者将患者送到医院进行免费的冠毒检测和住院治疗,都有助于减少疫情传播。 惟,他认为“该措施存在着漏洞”。他指出,短期到访的人群并不在可获得低廉或豁免医药费的群组中,可能有一部分的人们就不愿接受检测,而本身患有其他疾病的患者,因为入院,是否也必须为其他疾病支付医药费,似乎为患者徒增压力。 “在冠毒疫情之外,这些都是新加坡昂贵医药系统所需解决的漏洞。” 全国策略不能欠缺人民参与 鄞义林指出,新加坡在应对疫情来袭时,非常依赖卫生系统,且获得警方协助追踪接触者。换言之,我国在这部分已经建立强大的体系来应对流行病等危机,这也意味着我国策略中并没有充分考量人民的参与度,导致新漏洞的出现。 他表示,从部长们的发言中,可察觉到他们已预先计划了应对疫情的措施,且预计有关流行病将持续一段时间。其他国家在面对疫情时遭受严重打击,新加坡却能相对地自保。 但是,他也批评部长们在策划时,并没有将国民和居民纳入考量,以致国民和居民行事偏离了他们的计划时,就开始批评,甚至怒骂。 “国民和居民都没有被告知过有关策略,想当然的就无法根据计划集体行事,引起了恐慌性大抢购行动,部长却称这为愚蠢和笨蛋的行为,令部长们感到尴尬,成为了国家在做充分准备应对疫情事件上的污点。这也是为什么部分患者被指责为没有负起社会责任,因为他们若有社会责任,就不会有这么多起感染病例,也能让国家看起来更完美。”…

Hair Zoom Studio raising funds for Changi Village cat sterilisation

A handful of volunteers want to stop the population boom in the…