by: Vivian Chueh/

Is the current Singapore the Singapore we really want? Perhaps, it used to be, but as a sixteen-year-old who grew up here, I cannot help but critique how policies implemented and systems which are in place, have so much room for improvement.

I was reading the open letter written to the Minister of Education by the Secondary 4 girl and I could feel my heart trigger a little – this was what many have been wanting to say. I’m of the same age as her, and I feel the same way.

In school, we were only told to memorise things word by word and at most of the times we don’t even understand the meanings.

I believe that Singaporean youths have talents. It’s just that they have not been trained to think critically or in terms of general knowledge. Their innovation and creativity have been stripped off by the local education system which only taught them how to memorize words.

Sometimes, I really wonder if I would ever apply the concepts I studied in A Maths, such as logarithms and binomials, which I guess would never be ever used after I step out of the school compound on the day of graduation. I went to research on the use of the binomial theorem, and found out that it was mostly used to calculate the possibilities in a gambling game. So unless I grow up to become a gambler, I don’t think I would ever make use of that concept.

I would like to study media in a Polytechnic after graduating (even if I do qualify for junior college), because I have grown sick and tired of studying things that are useless to me in the future.

But some of my classmates are not so lucky though, as they are pressurised by their parents and relatives, who still have the traditional thinking that JCs are better. And growing up under such an education system, only makes us less innovative and hence, supposedly inferior to the talents from other countries.

So who’s fault is that?

When I first spoke about my political views at an open house of an opposition party, many were surprised at my level of maturity, and that I am only a sixteen-year-old. Born in Taiwan and from a politically-connected family, I’ve seen how youths as young as 12 engage in politics in Taiwan.

I am surprised how Singaporean youngsters were so turned off and unconcerned about what’s going on in their country. It wouldn’t be a surprise for a sixteen-year-old to be speaking in political rallies in Taiwan or many other countries, but I see the opposite being true in Singapore.

When I asked my friends about their political views, most of them would tell me they are not interested. But to think again, there is a reason behind it. The reason being unfairness and predilection in this city-state.

I once read an article published by the mainstream media, about increasing the awareness of the teenagers on politics and public issues. But I think instead of promoting the awareness and giving the teenagers some space to think and analyze policies and issues, the article started telling them what’s right or wrong, which snips away the critical thinking of the youngsters.

I was abraded by the bias and prejudiced articles published by the state controlled media. It was quite obvious even to a 16-year-old like me, that many articles are selected in favor of the ruling party – especially those published during the election period.

My friend once asked me, “why are you spending so much time raising concerns to the government, will they even listen?”. This question precisely underscores the reason why many are unwilling to get involved in politics.

The reason I am interested in politics, is because I want to see changes.

But if the outcry and unhappiness of young people like me is not going to get through (as the state-controlled media keeps rejecting my letters), I, too, see no point in engagement. Perhaps, nothing will change.

Please do take a good look around you; at the Singapore that is around you. Please don’t be afraid to stand for what you believe in. If you see that things are not right, have the courage to speak up.

Don’t wait for things to happen; make it happen!


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Police to return activist's note book after lawyer's demands

The Singapore Police has agreed to return the note book it had…

Unconvinced by PM Lee’s arguments

Andrew Loh / Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong addressed about 1,200 tertiary…

新型冠状病毒累积80宗死亡病例 一官员抢救无效逝世

据中国卫生应急办公室官网资讯,截至本月27日凌晨12时,中国国家卫生健康委会共收到30省累积确诊病例2744宗,重症病例461例,累积死亡病例80例。 累积治愈出院有51例以及疑似病例多达5794例。至于已知香港确诊病例多达八例,澳门五例例以及台湾地区四例。 新加坡迄今为止确诊的病例多达四宗,邻国马来西亚四宗、泰国七例、日本三例、韩国三例,美国三例,越南二例,尼泊尔一例,法国三例,澳大利亚四例。 此外,在武汉新增死亡病例中,亦包括一位武汉市民宗委原主任王献良。他在本月26日下午,抢救无效在武汉市中心医院(北区)去世。 王献良今年62岁,湖北监利人,曾任武汉市民政局副局长。2012年,王献良被任命为武汉市民宗委主任。此后五年间他一直担任该职。 北京新增5起武汉肺炎确诊病例,其中包含一名9个月大女婴,成为北京最小的年龄最小确诊病例。

扬言调查录音泄露事件 中华总商会会长亦参与人协基层工作

本月10日,贸工部长陈振声出席新加坡中华总商会(SCCCI)的一项闭门对话会。不料会议上的谈话内容被录音,音频在网络疯传。 音频中可听见陈振声,以新加坡式英语向与会者解说政府处理口罩问题面对的难处,期间更揶揄一小撮国人到超市疯抢日用品囤货、抢购口罩的行为“下衰”,认为是“白痴”(idiots)行径。 对于谈话内容泄露,新加坡中华总商会黄山忠也发表文告,谴责泄露音频者的行为,也认为此举使商会声誉遭损,以及伤害了商会与陈振声部长多年来建立的信任。 不过对于商会会长的回应,人权律师张素兰反倒有不同看法,她在脸书发文浅谈此事,希望“给商会会长一些安慰”,认为后者不必对录音泄露一事感到担忧,因为私人会议上录音政府也常做,该会会员在会上录音的行为,并不可耻。 张素兰:本来无良誉 何惧损毁? 但张素兰话锋一转,又指不必对该会成员行为可能拉低商会声誉一事,感到遗憾。“您和商会可能对贵会的“崇高声誉”过于自负。对我而言,贵会对于普通老百姓无所建树。实则贵会只对有钱有势者阿谀奉承。” 她反倒建议黄山忠不必去调查到底是谁泄露陈振声的谈话内容,“就我所知贵会也没有声誉。而且我知道,群众根本不在乎。” 她回溯2015年,他代表功能八号氏族会,为陈嘉庚的外孙傅树介医生的著作《活在欺瞒年代》,租用陈嘉庚礼堂办推介活动。她付了抵押金;但数日后被告知,理事不让租用,且没告知理由。 后来傅树介在推介礼上曾提起,身为陈嘉庚外孙,却不能租用以外公命名的礼堂,推介自己的回忆录向老人家致敬,对此他感到遗憾。“对我而言,这是一个病危社会的征兆。” 黄山忠任大巴窑中公民咨询委会主席 事实上,除了领导新加坡中华总商会,黄山忠本身是达丰控股董事经理兼首席执行官。…