Current Affairs
Important to build a gracious society
Learn from other countries to build a gracious society, says Tan Kin Lian.
We may have to re-think some of the policies that have shaped Singapore successfully in past years, but have become disadvantageous today.
Liu I-Chun wrote a letter that was published in the Today paper recently. It was titled, “I will miss this home.” The sub-title said, “In Taipei, hospitality and kindness abound, making it an extremely liveable city”.
Here’s what she wrote in her letter:
I am an expatriate who has been living in Taipei for the past three years, and have grown to like this place
Cultural vibrancy, a convenient public transport system and excellent healthcare system aside, it is the hospitality of the Taiwanese people that I will dearly miss when I leave this city.
People automatically give up their seats on buses and trains to the infirmed and the elderly …..
Shopping is such a pleasant experience in Taiwan. Sales staff often go out of their way to meet the needs of customers …..
I am also full of praise for the healthcare system. Patients are treated with respect, patience and empathy. Nurses often offer words of encouragement and ask how the patients are doing when they undergo uncomfortable or painful procedures.
This hospitality extends to food stall owners as well. I have been treated to off-the-menu special dishes and free up-sized orders. Such generosity actually comes from owners who are barely able to keep their businesses afloat.
The Taiwanese have taught me much with their graciousness, kindness and generosity.
My recent visit
My daughter has been working in Taipei for the past year. She is enjoying her work and life in Taipei and has a similar liking for this city.
At the turn of 2008, I spent a few days in Taipei with her. I personally experienced much of what is said by I-Chun during my short stay. I liked the excellent taxi service and mass transit system. I enjoyed the courteous and helpful service of the sales staff in the shops and the friendliness of the people.
My recent experience is in sharp contrast with my first visit to Taiwan more than 30 years ago. At that time, Taiwan was under martial law. People were fearful. I was told to be careful about robbers and crime.
What has caused this big change in the people of Taiwan since then?
A democratic and free society
The people of Taiwan have enjoyed true democracy and freedom for the past twenty years, after the lifting of martial law. More importantly, the people feel that they have a voice in shaping their future, the freedom to choose their leaders and to hold them accountable.
Although the economy of Taiwan went through a difficult patch in recent years, the people are still optimistic and happy with their situation.
Our local media likes to highlight the rowdy behaviour of the politicians in the legislative assembly in Taiwan or their unusual practices in attracting people to attend election rallies during election periods, to show what being democratic or living in a democracy will do. The Taiwanese people seem to find these types of behaviour to be quite acceptable and a true reflection of a free society.
Our neighbouring countries
In Jakarta, I watched a television program with three actors mimicking President Yudhoyono, Vice President Kalla and former President Gus Dur. The audience included many young undergraduates in their college uniforms. They enjoyed the humour thoroughly. My friend said that this weekly program is very popular with the people. It made the political leaders quite like ordinary people, which they really are.
I asked a few friends how life today was, compared to the days under President Suharto. They said that people are generally happier and that they appreciated their freedom. This is in spite of the setback in the economy caused by the fluid political situation.
Another friend said that Malaysian businessmen are now more optimistic about the future of their country after the recent election setback of the ruling Barisan National. They believe that the Government will be more accountable to the people.
Lessons for Singapore
I hope that Singapore can learn from Taiwan and build a more gracious society. This was the goal set by Mr. Goh Chok Tong some years ago, when he was Prime Minister. This goal seemed to have been shelved in recent years. I hope that it can be re-launched, as it is worth pursuing.
If our people are happy and proud to be Singaporeans, they will be more generous, gracious and helpful, like the Taiwanese.
Perhaps, we should address some of the following issues:
1. Give our people a larger voice in shaping the future of our country. Make them feel that their voice really matters.
2. Make our people feel that it is a privilege, and not a burden, to be a Singaporean citizen. For example, we must address the disadvantages faced by our male citizens who have to perform national service. Let us help them more adequately to face the competition for jobs in our own country, to offset the disadvantages caused by this liability.
3. Help our people to enjoy life and living in Singapore. They should not have to work for long hours to pay for the high cost of living in Singapore, and still feel uncertain about their future.
4. Let us make public transport, healthcare, education, housing and other essentials affordable to ordinary people. We should put people first in providing these essential services and not treat them as opportunities for businesses to make profits and more profits.
5. Let us treat our citizens as people and not as mere digits.
If Singaporeans are happy with life here and more confident about the future, they will not be thinking of migrating to be second-class residents in other countries. They will want to make Singapore their home. They may be happy and confident to start a family and have more children.
We may have to re-think some of the policies that have shaped Singapore successfully in past years, but have become disadvantageous today.
——————
Current Affairs
TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods
The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.
The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.
The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.
These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).
In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.
According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.
MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.
However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.
In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”
It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.
As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.
TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.
In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.
TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.
This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.
The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.
In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.
MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.
Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.
POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.
Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.
As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.
Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.
Current Affairs
Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing
Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.
SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.
This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.
Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.
He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.
Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.
The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.
These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.
These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.
Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.
Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.
Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.
On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.
The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.
Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.
According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.
CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.
Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.
Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.
Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.
He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Christopher Tan criticizes mrt breakdown following decade-long renewal program
-
Comments7 days ago
Netizens question Ho Ching’s praise for Chee Hong Tat’s return from overseas trip for EWL disruption
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
SMRT updates on restoration progress for East-West Line; Power rail completion expected today
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Chee Hong Tat: SMRT to replace 30+ rail segments on damaged EWL track with no clear timeline for completion
-
Singapore1 week ago
Lee Hsien Yang pays S$619,335 to Ministers Shanmugam and Balakrishnan in defamation suit to protect family home
-
Singapore1 week ago
Train services between Jurong East and Buona Vista to remain disrupted until 1 Oct due to new cracks on East-West Line
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Major breakdown on East-West Line: SMRT faces third service disruption in a month
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Transport Minister: Boon Lay-Queenstown train services may not resume tomorrow; SMRT leaders apologise