By Tiffany Gwee
Earlier this month, Singapore-based business and lifestyle blogger Ms. Grace Tan recently blogged about receiving a letter in the mail from a company known as ‘Singapore Company Register’. Her blog post is entitled “Singapore Company Register – Business Owners BEWARE!
The company asked for “verification” of her website. It stated in the mail that if she does not verify her information in 2 weeks, the company’s information “will be deleted from the Singapore Company Register database”.
To her disgust, she found out that the company “is a directory site trying to get companies to register with it for S$490 per year to get listed on the site”.
Ms. Grace attached a copy of the letter she received as shown below.
singapore-company-register
Not the Only One
Ms. Tan seems to be only one of many who received the same mail asking for registration. Just late last year, local newspapers reported about “an entity calling itself the Singapore Company Register” requesting for verification of details of various businesses and companies.
However, national regulator of business entities and public accountants ACRA had stated that it has “no links whatsoever” to the entity regarding this matter. They also mentioned that companies are “not obliged” to provide details to them and should only update their information with ACRA themselves.
The Singapore Company Register seems to be making its rounds again even after ACRA had firmly declared that the company is not part of them.
Not Understandable

In Ms. Tan’s blog post about the incident, she expressed much discontent with the situation as she alleged that the company might not be conducting their business in a legal, ethical and moral way.

“Tsk tsk. Why some people do business this way, I know not.”…“I can’t believe ACRA is letting this company continue to send out letters like that.”

Demanding the Removal of Post
Just yesterday, Ms. Tan received a lawyer’s letter sent to her by lawyers representing the company “Data Register Pte Ltd”, previously known as “Company Register Pte Ltd”.
In the letter, the company demanded for her blog post (entitled “Singapore Company Register – Business Owners BEWARE!”) to be taken down as the postings “are highly defamatory” to the company.
It states that there is “little or no basis” for her to suggest that the company is doing business in a way which is not legal, ethical or moral”.
Other than the removal of the post, the company also demanded an apology to be published on her blog, “as well as any other websites (she) has made the defamatory statements on”. The company has also asked for her to inform those whom she is aware “have read the posting” about the apology.
She is to give a reply as to whether she will comply with the demands of the company or not by 5pm today.
Not Complying with Demand

In an email to the media, Ms. Tan clearly expressed her stance on the issue.

“I will not comply with their demand. I abhor such unethical business practice – its threat of “company information” deletion has already caused many to register online without realizing that the company is not linked to ACRA, and that a deletion would essentially have zero repercussion on any company’s operations.”

CAD to Investigate
After informing ACRA about the company, they have informed Ms. Tan that the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) “is now investigating this company”. She has also made a police report and personally wrote to CAD. ACRA had also warned against people registering with the company and has filed a total of 78 charges against the company.
Ms. Tan encouraged all who have been “harassed” via the issuance or demands for payment or “misled” by the company letters to either lodge a police report online here or write in to the CAD to inquire about the status of its investigation.
A letter regarding her situation had also been sent out to Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, Minister Lim Hng Kiang, Mr. Patrick Tay and Ms. Penny Low.
Letter to Working with Grace – Fraud allegation

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

LKY Controversial: LGBT – “It’s a genetic variation”

Mr Lee Kuan Yew was never one to shy away from the…

PA launched Silver WaVe initiative to engage senior citizens to be more active

People’s Association aims to take 1,000 senior citizens into water sports yearly,…

Attacking Dr Chee’s character uncalled for: SDP’s Dr Paul Tambyah

At the Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) second rally on May Day for…

执法人员飞踢电动滑板车骑士 陆交局调查、不姑息偏离守则行为

对于网络上疯传,有执法人员飞踢电动滑板车骑士的争议视频,陆路交通管理局在今晚(11日)于脸书公开回应,指当局目前已介入调查,且不会姑息任何偏离执法守则的行为。 当局指出,昨日傍晚约6时40分,一组陆交局执法人员和策安(Certis Cisco)辅警组成的队伍,正在勿洛蓄水池路一带进行执法任务。 有关辅警发现一名电动滑板车骑士,在勿洛北三道行驶,于是发信号指示停车,孰料骑士竟避开辅警。最终在下个路口北另一辅警截停(即网传视频中,被飞踢)。 当局连同警方、策安公司已介入调查。当局解释,策安乃是在合约下协助陆交局进行执法活动。 与此同时,陆交局指有关骑士在公路上使用未注册、重达30.54公斤不符规格的电动滑板车,目前已被当局没收及调查。 有关视频相信是被其中一辆轿车的行车记录器拍到,显示一辆电动滑板车正在靠左边车道行驶,似乎是想要躲避执法人员。 在视频最后第8秒,执法人员使出全身力气,冲向对面马路,想要先挡在电动滑板车面前,让它停驶却无果,最后使出“无影脚”飞踢电动滑板车,而电动滑板车则翻向路边倒下。 在视频最后第8秒,执法人员使出全身力气,冲向对面马路,想要先挡在电动滑板车面前,让它停驶却无果,最后使出“无影脚”飞踢电动滑板车,而电动滑板车则翻向路边倒下。 视频一出,立刻引起网民疯传,不同的声音也随之而来。部分网民认为执法人员正在执行公务,飞踢是为了阻止电动滑板车的行驶;但有者也担忧执法过度,没必要用过度的暴力对付违规者。