Sunday, 24 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

What is Thailand’s royal defamation law?

BANGKOK, THAILAND — Thailand’s monarchy is protected by one of the world’s toughest defamation laws, making any criticism of King Maha Vajiralongkorn and the royal household very risky inside the country.

The liberal reformist Move Forward Party won the most seats in the May elections, having pledged to soften the law.

But its efforts to form a government have been thwarted by Thailand’s military-appointed senators, who are vehemently opposed to any effort that reduces the law’s scope or the onerous prison terms handed down to convicted offenders.

What is the law?

Under Section 112 of Thailand’s penal code, anyone convicted of defaming, insulting or threatening the king, queen, heir or regent faces between three and 15 years in prison on each count.

But the law is routinely interpreted to include criticism of any aspect of the monarchy — including content posted or shared on social media.

In the harshest punishment so far, a man was sentenced to 35 years in jail in 2017 for a series of Facebook posts and comments about the royal family.

Lese-majeste crimes have been on the books for more than a century but were strengthened in 1976.

How is it enforced?

Anyone can make an accusation under the law and authorities are duty-bound to investigate.

There is no transparent disclosure of the official number of lese-majeste complaints, arrests, charges or sentences — only an inconsistent trickle of information from authorities.

The use of Section 112 has risen dramatically since the military coup in 2014.

Self-appointed royalist civilian groups also monitor the web and report alleged violations.

According to legal aid groups, just six people were jailed on lese-majeste convictions before 2014.

That number has skyrocketed since, with 246 people accused of or charged with breaking the law since mid-2020, including 20 minors.

Those charged are almost always convicted, but if they plead guilty sentences are often reduced.

What is punished under the law?

Prosecutors have a broad definition for what counts as defamation of the royal family, with social media posts and satire falling afoul of the law.

An anti-junta activist was convicted in 2017 after posting a news story on Facebook, even though more than 2,000 others had shared the same article.

His two-and-a-half-year sentence was cut short when the king pardoned him in 2019.

Another man was prosecuted in 2015 for satirical comments he made about the favourite dog of Bhumibol Adulyadej, Vajiralongkorn’s father and the reigning monarch at the time.

There is no comparative research that shows which countries use royal defamation laws the most, but historian David Streckfuss says Thailand’s prosecution rate had made the kingdom “the leader” since 2006.

Can the media report on it?

Domestic and international media must exercise strict caution in their reporting of lese-majeste cases and the monarchy in general or risk prosecution.

Even detailed reports on issues such as demands from pro-democracy protesters could put reporters at risk.

Readers who share the news could also face prosecution, and even repeating or summarising the details of Section 112 charges could be interpreted as a violation.

Why is the law in the spotlight?

The Move Forward Party, which won the most seats in May’s election, has pushed for reforms to the law to soften criminal punishments.

But leader Pita Limjaroenrat’s efforts to form a government failed when senators, appointed by the military, roundly refused to endorse his nomination as prime minister.

Those lawmakers, and Thailand’s conservative political establishment more broadly, consider the party’s pledge to soften Section 112 a red line.

The Constitutional Court has also agreed to hear a case alleging that the reform promise amounted to an attempt to “overthrow” the constitutional monarchy — one of two cases that could see Pita disqualified from parliament.

Pita has said he will withdraw from consideration if a second vote on his candidacy fails on Wednesday, opening the way for a replacement that can secure Senate support by leaving the status quo in place.


Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts