Connect with us

Labour

Tan See Leng rebuts Jamus Lim: ONE Pass scheme brings in global talent to create more opportunities for Singaporeans

Published

on

SINGAPORE — Last Friday (23 Sep 2022), Associate Professor Jamus Lim who is the Workers’ Party Member of Parliament for Sengkang GRC posted a message on his Facebook page, highlighting concerns of the new ONE Pass scheme from the Manpower Ministry (MOM) would rob Singaporeans the opportunities to attain higher positions in companies.

“This week’s house visits brought #TeamSengkang to 355A, where we had so many long, sobering conversations that we only made our way through a third of the block,” Assoc Prof Lim said. “With so many Singaporeans returning to the workplace, many conversations revolved around the labor market, and in particular, the place of foreign talent relative to our domestic workforce.”

In particular, Assoc Prof Lim mentioned that one resident had shared with him his concerns over the One Pass scheme. The resident returned back to Singapore after a long stint in China, and has been having difficulties finding a job here, despite his extensive experience and solid skill set.

“He expressed his concern that ONE Pass—despite its high qualification bar—would ultimately end up exacerbating the difficulties locals faced in advancing to the upper tiers of the corporate hierarchy, thereby relegating them to being trapped in middle management.”

This fear was further corroborated by the impression that many foreign nationals working here tended to favor their own countrymen, further alienating Singaporean job seekers, Assoc Prof Lim added.

In his post, Assoc Prof Lim said it broke his heart hearing that there are many Singaporeans who feel being discriminated against “right at home”.

Indeed, in a 2019 written response by then-Manpower Minister Josephine Teo, she was forced to reveal that the Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) received an average of 379 workplace discrimination complaints each year between 2014 and the first half of 2021, but the interesting fact is that the bulk of the complaints (61.5%) were attributed as “discrimination by nationality”.

Manpower Minister Tan See Leng Rebuts Assoc Prof Lim

In response to the posting from Assoc Prof Lim, Manpower Minister Tan See Leng rebutted him in another Facebook post on Friday (30 Sep). Dr Tan reiterated that the ONE Pass scheme is to “bring in global talent who can create more opportunities for Singaporeans”.

“More Singaporeans will have opportunities to work in leading firms, alongside experts from around the world, and progress in their careers,” he said. He went on to describe the various government programmes to “grow the local talent pool”.

“Local leadership development schemes like International Posting Programme (iPOST) and SkillsFuture Leadership Development Initiative also help local talent gain regional and global experiences, to prepare them for senior positions,” he said. “On the macro level, local employment has continued to grow every year since 2020, and unemployment rates have since recovered to pre-COVID levels.”

But of course, Singaporean PMETs who are retrenched and forced to drive Grab would not be counted as “unemployed”.

With regard to discrimination against locals, Dr Tan said MOM takes fair consideration “seriously”.

“Employers must practise fair consideration in their selection of candidates and MOM will not hesitate to take action against employers found to be discriminatory,” he assured. “If there are specific instances of discriminatory behaviour or unfair treatment, we urge members of the public to report them to TAFEP Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices.”

“Companies invest in Singapore and create good jobs here because we have built up a strong talent pool. Having the right complementary talent here will add to the number of opportunities available to us, and to future generations. This is what our foreign manpower policy and schemes like ONE Pass aim to achieve.”

“I Felt Like A Foreigner In My Own Country”

Not all netizens, however, agreed with Dr Tan’s comment that “Singaporeans will have opportunities to work in leading firms, alongside experts from around the world, and progress in their careers”.

One wrote on Dr Tan’s Facebook post: “Dear minister, please check the front office positions of UBS, Barings Private Equity Asia, Warburg Pincus , SC Ventures, KKR, Morgan Stanley and Value Partners”

Another commenter, Wong wrote: “Didn’t gov know that the Prerequisite for your statement must be these foreigners in top positions will hire talented Singaporeans for PMET and senior positions! Take a walk at Changi Business Park and MBFC. It’s not so hard for you to figure out that Foreigners will hire and promote their own people!”

Indeed, during a Parliamentary debate about a month after 2020 GE, MP Ang Wei Neng recounted his experience while visiting the Changi Business Park.

When he entered a lift, Mr Ang said he noticed that the “well-dressed” people around him were “apparently foreigners” and speaking in a language foreign to him. He said it was the first time he had felt “like a foreigner in my own country”.

Mr Ang questioned why this might be, especially with assurances from the government that nearly six in 10 in the workforce are locals. He then pointed to the high number of Employment Pass and S-Pass issued to foreign PMETs.

“When I checked the MOM’s statistics, I noted there were 193,700 Employment Pass holder or E-Pass holders and 200,000 S-Pass holders as of December 2019. Why are there so many?”

He cautioned the government how Singaporeans would be unhappy if they lost their jobs while foreigners held on to PMET jobs.

Mr Ang’s comments came after his party lost a second GRC — Sengkang GRC — to the opposition in the 2020 GE.

Continue Reading
1 Comment
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Labour

19 workplace fatalities in first half of 2024, MOM reports

Singapore’s Workplace Safety and Health report, issued on 9 October, revealed 19 workplace fatalities in the first half of 2024, up from 14 in 2023. Vehicular incidents were the leading cause, followed by falls from heights and equipment breakdowns. With five more deaths reported by September, the total fatalities for 2024 have reached at least 24. In comparison, 36 deaths were recorded in 2023.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Nineteen workers died from workplace injuries in the first half of 2024, an increase from 14 fatalities during the same period in 2023, according to Singapore’s Workplace Safety and Health (WSH) performance report released by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) on Wednesday (9 October).

Vehicular incidents were the leading cause of death, followed by falls from a height and the collapse or breakdown of structures and equipment.

These causes accounted for 11 of the fatalities – 58 per cent of the total deaths.

The construction, marine, transportation and storage, and manufacturing industries were responsible for 63 per cent of the 19 fatalities.

In the construction sector alone, five workers lost their lives, down from seven fatalities in the first half of 2023 and 11 in the second half of that year.

The marine industry saw four deaths in the first six months of 2024, despite no fatalities being recorded in 2023.

The transportation and storage sector had two fatalities, down from five in the same period last year. One fatality occurred in the manufacturing sector, mirroring the number from the first half of 2023.

In the water supply, sewerage, and waste management sector, three workers died, including two who inhaled poisonous fumes while cleaning tanks at PUB’s Choa Chu Kang Waterworks. There were no fatalities in this sector in 2023.

As of September 2024, five more deaths were reported, bringing the total workplace fatalities for the year to at least 24.

In comparison, 36 deaths were recorded in 2023.

The most recent workplace fatality occurred on 29 September, when a 44-year-old Bangladeshi worker tragically lost his life in an accident at a construction site within Resorts World Sentosa (RWS).

The worker was fatally struck by a collapsing steel structure during lifting operations.

Two workers tragically lost their lives on 17 September following a heavy machinery accident at a North-South Corridor construction site along Lentor Avenue.

The incident occurred while a group of workers was assembling a winch drum on two concrete blocks. The winch slipped, causing injuries to four workers.

Singapore’s Workplace Fatality Rate Rises Slightly, Now Fifth Among OECD Countries

The latest WSH report noted that Singapore’s workplace fatality rate from January to June 2024 was one death per 100,000 workers, slightly up from 0.8 in the first half of 2023 and 0.99 in the latter half of that year.

Singapore ranks fifth among Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries, with a three-year average of 1.1 deaths per 100,000 workers.

The Netherlands and United Kingdom lead with 0.4, followed by Sweden at 0.7 and Germany at 0.8.

Major Injuries Decline

There were 293 major injuries in the first half of 2024, down from 316 in the same period of 2023.

These injuries, which include amputations, blindness, and paralysis, predominantly occurred in the construction and manufacturing industries. The main causes were slips, trips and falls; machinery incidents; and falls from a height.

The manufacturing sector saw a significant 35 per cent reduction in fatalities and major injuries, with 60 incidents recorded in the first half of 2024 compared to 92 in the same period last year.

The number of fatal and major injuries from metalworking also fell sharply, from 40 in 2023 to 22 in 2024.

In the construction sector, fatalities and major injuries from smaller-scale works, such as renovations, decreased by 22 per cent, from 59 in 2023 to 46 in 2024.

Senior Minister of State for Manpower Zaqy Mohamad attributed these improvements to the expanded demerit point system and increased surveillance.

The system, introduced to the manufacturing sector in October 2023 after years of use in construction, penalises companies for safety violations, potentially barring them from hiring foreign workers for up to two years.

Minor Injuries and Occupational Diseases

In the first half of 2024, there were 10,379 minor injuries, a 4.8 per cent reduction from 10,897 in the same period of 2023.

Slips, trips, falls, and machinery incidents were the leading causes. Meanwhile, the number of occupational diseases continued to drop, with 473 cases reported, down from 653 in 2023.

MOM also reported 11 dangerous occurrences in the first half of 2024, fewer than the 12 in the same period last year. These incidents included the collapse of structures and equipment, as well as fires and explosions.

MOM conducted over 3,000 inspections in various industries and took enforcement actions against more than 7,000 breaches, issuing 717 fines totalling more than $1.4 million and 22 stop-work orders.

Continue Reading

Labour

Singapore’s Manpower Ministry engages Dyson over last-minute layoff notice to union

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has engaged with Dyson following the company’s one-day notice to a labour union regarding retrenchments. MOM emphasised the importance of early notification to unions as per the Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower. It noted that while Dyson is unionised, the retrenched professionals, managers, and executives (PMEs) are not covered by the union’s collective representation.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has initiated talks with Dyson after the company gave just one day’s notice to a labour union about a retrenchment exercise.

The United Workers of Electronics and Electrical Industries (UWEEI) had earlier requested a conciliation session to address the issue.

According to MOM’s statement on 3 October, the ministry met with Dyson on 2 October and plans to meet with the UWEEI to facilitate an amicable solution.

The dispute arose after UWEEI’s executive secretary, Patrick Tay, voiced the union’s disappointment that it was notified of the retrenchment just a day before Dyson laid off an unspecified number of workers on 1 October.

Tay expressed concern that the short notice did not allow enough time for discussions to ensure a fair and progressive retrenchment process.

He also highlighted that more time would have enabled better support for the affected employees.

According to MOM, under the Tripartite Advisory on Managing Excess Manpower and Responsible Retrenchment, unionised companies should give unions early notice when informing employees of retrenchments.

However, while Dyson is unionised, the professionals, managers, and executives (PMEs) who were laid off are not covered by the union’s collective representation.

“Hence the period of notice to inform UWEEI is negotiable,” MOM said.

However, MOM acknowledged that insufficient notice was given in this instance and stated its intent to work with both parties to improve communication going forward.

The Ministry also emphasised that the formula for calculating retrenchment benefits for PMEs does not necessarily have to follow the same criteria applied to rank-and-file workers.

The specific terms of such benefits are subject to negotiation between the union and the company, a position that has been agreed upon within Singapore’s tripartite framework.

MOM reaffirmed that it would mediate the issue if needed.

In its 3 October statement, MOM reiterated Singapore’s commitment to supporting businesses like Dyson that choose to invest in the country.

“We will work with these companies, economic agencies and NTUC to ensure that we remain both pro-worker and pro-growth.”

Mr Tay, who is also a Member of Parliament from ruling People’s Action Party (PAP), in an video message posted on UWEEI’s official Facebook page, urged Dyson executives affected by the retrenchment to seek assistance from the union in ensuring that their benefits are fair.

However, he noted that Dyson has not shared crucial details, such as the job levels of those impacted, which complicates the union’s efforts.

Tay explained that some affected workers had been instructed to keep their retrenchment packages confidential or risk losing them, further adding to the union’s concerns.

Although the union believes the package aligns with UWEEI’s standard of one month’s salary per year of service, Tay stated that uncertainty remains over whether the package is capped.

“That is why we are concerned that we have not received more information from Dyson on who the affected workers are or their job levels as Section 30A of the Industrial Relations Act also allows UWEEI to represent executives individually on retrenchment benefits.”

In response to the ongoing situation, UWEEI has established a task force to provide guidance to the retrenched employees, particularly in terms of job searches.

Tay also issued a public call for Dyson employees, especially PMEs, to join UWEEI so the union could better support them during such retrenchment exercises.

Continue Reading

Trending