Source: Yale News Daily

It appears that the decision to dissolve Yale-NUS in 2025 and merge the college’s programme with the existing National University of Singapore University Scholars Programme in a “New College” was made without input or consultation from Yale.

A report by Yale Daily News — the oldest college daily newspaper in US — on Tuesday (7 September) said that university officials were surprised by the decision to push Yale out of the joint college.

It was also reported that four Yale-NUS professors and administrators said that the decision for the merger, and leaving Yale out of it, comes against a “political backdrop of rising meritocracy and anti-elitist sentiment”. They said this could have sparked tension over the exclusive programme offered at Yale-NUS within the broader university structure.

Vice President for Global Strategy Pericles Lewis was reported saying that NUS leadership wanted to open more spots for Singaporeans students and allow them to take courses in all NUS majors

The dissolution of Yale-NUS is based on a clause in the founding of the college back in 2011 which allows either party to unilaterally pull out of the collaboration in 2021.

Richard Levin, Yale-NUS co-founder and Governing Board member said to Yale Daily News: “I don’t think we really had an opportunity to keep the college going on its own terms.”

“It was stated pretty clearly that NUS was going to exercise its option to withdraw.”

Mr Levin added that the founders of Yale-NUS had inserted the clause on the understanding that Yale might remove its name from the venture and pursue other international projects but that the college itself would continue on.

Instead, an unofficial transcript of a USP town hall seen by Yale Daily News reportedly indicates that NUS had been pushing for the merger of Yale-NUS with its existing USP for 18 months before the decision was announced.

About a year ago, NUS began considering ways to ensure a smooth transition, according to the transcript.

However, the article noted that an NUS spokesperson has disputed the transcript’s timeline, saying that the broader restructuring of the institution began in December 2020 while the idea to shut down Yale-NUS came later.

Professor Lewis, however, had said that the idea to dissolve Yale-NUS came from NUS President Tan Eng Chye as part of a broader restructuring of Singapore’s educational landscape which he was pursuing since 2018.

Yale Daily News reported an NUS spokesperson saying that Mr Tan approached the Ministry of Education (MOE) and NUS Board of Trustees in late June this year with the plan to close Yale-NUS. Once approval was given, Mr Tan contacted University President Peter Salovey with the news in July.

It was only later that the Yale-NUS leadership was told of the decision to end the college, according to the Yale-NUS student newspaper, The Octant.

​​“He definitely made the decision that that was going to happen, and I think he probably had gotten the approval of his trustees for that,” Professor Lewis reportedly told Yale Daily News, adding that it was “mostly a surprise”.

Though both Mr Levin and Professor Lewis said that they were aware of the new vision for NUS over a year ago, they didn’t think at the time that the changes would include the end of the Yale-NUS partnership, said Mr Levin to the Yale Daily News.

According to Mr Lewis, Mr Tan made his decision clear and that there was no chance for a counteroffer.

Instead, Mr Tan’s contact with Mr Salovey in the following weeks was on how to make the merge effective and maintain the Yale-NUS experience for current students.

Professor Lewis added that Yale was clear on its intention to continue with Yale-NUS, however, the decision had been made by Mr Tan and Mr Salovey ultimately respects it.

The full governing board was informed of the plans to merge Yale-NUS and the USP on 23 August by Mr Tan, said Mr Lewis.

Yale Daily News added that Yale has pledged that the Yale-NUS faculty and staff will keep their positions post-merger and that students will continue to get the same education experience in the next four years until the college closes.

Members of Parliament from Workers’ Party have filed questions for the upcoming Parliamentary sittings to gain “more insight” into the decision-making process behind the closure of Yale-NUS College.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nonsensical sign for playground emerges online again?

Imagine walking into a restaurant to have a meal and you stumble…

Charge against SAF captain accused in death of NSF withdrawn due to cancer diagnosis

An officer from the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) who has been accused…

Notices put up at Sungei Tengah Lodge asking residents to refrain from using public transportation; LTA clarified that there is no such restrictions

It was brought to our attention that notices recently went up at…

接获雇主投报展开调查 警揭发女佣将狗狗摔下楼

涉嫌将女主饲养多年的贵宾犬自三楼抛下后,印尼籍女佣装着一脸“无辜”地告知雇主,导致狗狗伤势过重而被安乐死,之后被警方揭发。 狠心印尼籍女佣,吉雅蒂(28岁)时于半年前,就受雇于住在杨厝港朝阳径(Sunrise Walk)三层排屋,来自香港的一对夫妇。他们分别是在银行业就职的许先生(36岁)以及沙女士(36岁,心理治疗师)。 这对夫妇有一只饲养了11年的贵宾犬“豆豆”,跟随他们自香港搬迁到韩国呆了七年,之后在一年前来到新加坡。 但是,在5月13日早上9时许,女佣突然向他们说,“豆豆”躺在前院一动不动,吓了他们一跳。当时书房办公的许先生,以及在房中休息的沙女士立刻趋前查看,发现狗狗的嘴角流血。 两人立刻将狗狗送到兽医院急救,但是兽医表示狗狗内伤严重,脊椎几乎骨折,就算救活了也可能终身瘫痪,因此建议夫妇两给狗狗安乐死。沙女士指出,他们曾求医生不要放弃,“医生指出,就算救活狗狗,它也随时会有生命危险,我们只好忍痛同意安乐死。” 许先生指出,兽医曾表示,导致豆豆严重内伤的可能性只有三个,即被车撞、自高楼掉下或被人殴打,因此他们当时就怀疑女佣“做手脚”了。“我们当时就怀疑女佣,但是她矢口否认,我们也拿她无可奈何。” 此事件后不久,女佣就向夫妇表示不愿照顾小孩,甚至因此发生争执,夫妇俩气得报警。警方获得投保后,展开调查时,在女佣手机内发现了豆豆被抛下楼的证据,将她逮捕调查。