On Sunday (9 May), Singapore recorded 10 new community cases of COVID-19, of which four tested “preliminary positive” for the double mutant B1617 variant – which was first detected in India.

These four cases involved a Grab private hire, a property risk assessment personnel, a cleaner and an auxiliary police officer at Changi Airport Terminal 3.

The Ministry of Health (MOH) said that these individuals are pending further confirmatory tests.

As of 3 May, there have been 29 local cases of COVID-19 infected with variants detected in other countries, MOH said last week.

“The new variant strains have higher attack rates, they are more infectious, they are causing larger clusters than before,” said Education Minister Lawrence Wong, who co-chairs the COVID-19 multi-ministry task force.

He added, “Due to the new variants, (the cases) are more infectious and larger clusters are forming.”

Grab driver

As for the four new local cases with B1617 variant identified on Sunday, the first is a 38-year-old Singaporean male who works as a private hire car driver with Grab and is not linked to previous cases.

Referred to as Case 62969, the man has not gone to work since the onset of symptoms, said MOH. On 7 May, he came down with a fever and cough. He went to a general practitioner clinic on the very same day to seek treatment and was tested for COVID-19.

On the next day, his test result came back positive and he was taken in an ambulance to Alexandra Hospital. His serological test result is negative.

MOH also noted that the man lives with his girlfriend, a short-term visit pass holder, who arrived from Vietnam on 12 April. She served her stay-home notice at a dedicated facility until April 26.

She was tested for the virus on 25 April and her result came out negative.

Property risk assessment personnel

The second case is a Singaporean woman who works as a risk assessment personnel at Lendlease, and is not linked to previous cases.

The 40-year-old woman is identified as Case 62998 and has been working from home since 30 April.

MOH said she developed a fever on 7 May and went to a general practitioner clinic on the same day, where she was tested for COVID-19.

Her result came back positive the following day and she was sent to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital via an ambulance. Her serological test result is negative.

Cleaner at Changi Airport

Case 62971 is a 51-year-old work permit holder who is working as a cleaner at Changi Airport Terminal 3, employed by Ramky Cleantech Services.

She is a colleague of Case 62873 – an 88-year-old cleaner employed by Ramky Cleantech Services and stationed at Terminal 3 as well.

The last time the 51-year-old woman went to work was on 3 May. During a rostered routine testing on 5 May, her pooled test rest came back “inconclusive” and she was tested again on 7 May.

On the same day, she was also contacted by MOH and placed on phone surveillance given that she was identified as a colleague of Case 62873.

On the night of 7 May, she developed a cough and a headache and sought medical treatment at a polyclinic the next day. Her test result came back positive for COVID-19 on the same day and she was transferred to Gleneagles Hospital via an ambulance.

Her earlier tests from rostered routine testing – the last being on 21 April – all came out negative for the coronavirus. Her serology test result is negative.

Auxiliary police officer at Changi Airport

The fourth case identified with the B1617 variant is a 57-year-old Singaporean auxiliary police officer who is employed by Certis Cisco and works at Changi Airport Terminal 3.

The man’s job entails maintaining crowd control and checking travellers’ documents and he has not gone to work since the onset of symptoms, MOH noted.

The man developed a cough on 7 May and went to a general practitioner clinic to seek medical treatment, where he was tested for COVID-19.

The next day, his test result came back positive for COVID-19 and he was taken in an ambulance to Alexandra Hospital.

His earlier tests from rostered routine testing – the last done on 2 May – were all negative. His serological test result is negative.

The man has completed his full COVID-19 vaccination, with the first dose received on 15 February and the second on 8 March.

Netizens voice concerns over the detection of B1617 variant in Singapore

On social media, online users have expressed their concerns over the emergence of B1617 double mutant variant in Singapore. Penning their thoughts in the Facebook page of Channel News Asia, they said that this news is “worrying” and the public is afraid of the high number of community cases being reported on a daily basis.

One user noted that the Government should look into its own mistakes for allowing the B1617 variant to enter Singapore by opening the borders, instead of blaming the people.

One user expressed that the case of a Grab driver tested positive with the double mutant variant is “seriously a community case”. This is because he was in close contact with many passengers before he showed symptoms for the illness, and he could have gotten it from one of his passengers. This means that there are a lot more B1617 variant in the country.

Others blamed the Government and its ministers for allowing travellers from high-risk countries, especially India, to come into Singapore. They explained that the authorities did not take seriously the advices raised by the public on closing the borders sooner, resulting in more community cases here.

One user wrote: “Ministers don’t travel in public transport and take MRT/Grab, why would they care. Now citizens/people gotten Covid unnecessary due to Gov mishandling”.

One user pointed out that those who made the decision to keep the borders open for a long time should “be accountable and step down”.

“Stop taking millions of dollars salary make big mistake an still continue to take power and make stupid mistakes,” the user wrote.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
18 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens baffled by ICA granting entry to Vietnamese woman as “girlfriend” of Singaporean man under the familial ties lane

The Vietnamese woman who was the first reported case in the KTV…

Hyflux to sue Indonesian consortium Salim-Medco Group over “repudiation” of bailout agreement

Debt-ridden local water treatment firm and genco Hyflux is commencing civil proceedings…

人流量和配合度仍是防疫关键 医疗专家分析去看戏、亲友聚会仍是高风险活动

政府声称冠状病毒19社区确诊病例有减少趋势,政府也表示会在下个月开始逐渐放宽阻断措施。 然而,人们有必要认清,即使放宽措施后,有些活动仍含有“高风险”的传染率,但是人数和人群配合度还是关键。 据《联合早报》所采访的数名传染病专家,包括伊丽莎白诺维娜医院传染科医生梁浩楠以及新加坡国立大学苏瑞福公共卫生学院副院长(研究)古阿烈副教授(Alex Cook)等,将各种活动依据传染风险区分,让民众了解以及避免举办或参与有关活动。 专家们认为10人以上的大型活动,如亲友聚会、电影院、健身房、酒吧和按摩院等皆属于“高风险”活动;到理发店、美甲店或在餐饮场所堂食属“中等风险”;而去超市、巴刹、购物商场或公园等则属于“低风险”活动。 然而专家们提醒,有关的风险级别区分是非常主观的,并非绝对标准。 鹰阁医药中心传染病专科医生黄乘佑指出,不能以相关的区别为标准,因若在风险低的场合出现任何举止行为出格的人,那么传染率的风险还是会随着提高;在挤满人潮的体育馆观看赛事属于高风险,但是若限制人数,确保安全距离,球员们也没有相互拥抱等近距离动作,风险也会随着降低。 他认为限制个别场所的人流,将能够控制染病风险,比如限制餐厅食客的逗留时间,健身房也要时常为器材消毒等。 梁浩楠医生则指出,人数多少以及是否保持安全距离,是冠毒传播的效率关键,因此除了物体表面的接触,一些社交行为如拥抱、唱歌和握手等行为也会增加传播风险。虽然有专家指去超市或湿巴刹、零售商店等属低风险活动,但是他认为这些场所的室内空气流通不良,病毒的存活率就会偏高,因此他认为这类场所的风险应该属中等级别。 古阿烈副教授对于逐步开放不同活动之举表示赞同,他指出,目前在冠状病毒传染方面的研究仍然不够充分,若能够量化每项活动的风险,自然就依据安排活动的恢复时段。 惟,他指出,放宽阻断措施,传染率也有可能会提高,若染病率增加了,我国或许需要再次推行病毒阻断措施。

Only fair if all town councils are held to same code of conduct

Rules cannot be applied selectively and practices cannot be reviewed in a…