Kathmandu, the capital city of Nepal.

The Nepali Times reported on Wed that many Indian nationals who are stuck in India due to the coronavirus travel restrictions imposed by a number of countries, are now using Kathmandu, the capital city of Nepal, to fly abroad (‘Indians use Nepal to circumvent travel bans‘, 21 Apr).

It said that they are using Kathmandu as a transit point to fly to countries like Saudi Arabia, Singapore and Hong Kong, which have all banned direct flights from India. As of today (24 Apr), India reported more than 340,000 cases of coronavirus, setting a world record for a third day running.

“Despite Nepal itself seeing a surge in Covid-19 cases and fatalities, and a week-long lockdown in New Delhi, neither India nor Nepal and destination countries have so far stopped the roundabout route,” Nepali Times wrote.

“This has led to a several-fold increase in air fares for the daily two flights between New Delhi and Kathmandu. While the 1 hour and 15 minute Kathmandu-Delhi flights cost Rs9,000 this week, Delhi-Kathmandu tickets are selling for up to Rs45,000.”

The number of Indian nationals flying to Kathmandu from New Delhi has doubled in the past two months. There were 8,727 arriving in Kathmandu from 1-18 April, while the number was only 4,763 in the whole of February.

Currently, India and Nepal have an “air bubble” agreement with the Kathmandu-Delhi route served by Air India and Nepal Airlines.

Typically, the Indian nationals will spend 2 weeks in hotels in Kathmandu because of requirements by countries that passengers should not be in India in the past 14 days before arriving at the destination countries.

After staying 2 weeks in Kathmandu, the Indian nationals will immediately fly out to the destination countries, so as not to incur further lodging costs. Between 1-18 April, 5,250 Indian nationals flew out of Kathmandu airport, reported the Nepali Times.

The increased numbers of Indian nationals arriving and staying for 2 weeks meant that Kathmandu’s budget hotels are currently packed, noted Nepali Times. “We have seen an increase in bookings in budget hotels, and occupancy is up even in 2 and 3 star hotels,” said a representative from the Hotel Association of Nepal.

No doubt, the crowding in the hotels at Kathmandu would easily result in the spreading of the COVID-19 virus.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
47 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

匪打爆车窗偷160口罩

新型冠状病毒疫情持续升温,人人为自保而抢购口罩、消毒液等防疫物品,以致出现“口罩荒”等现象。“物以稀为贵”,如今连口罩都成为匪徒掠劫的目标。 香港警察昨日(2月12日)在脸书专页帖文,指一辆停放在上水区新成路路边的轿车被匪徒打爆车窗,偷走了车上的八盒口罩。 警方指出,有关事件发生在2月11日清晨,被盗走的N95口罩共多达160个。 帖文中指出,警方透过闭路电视记录,发现了两名嫌疑男子,并且已展开了“反车内盗窃”行动,在上水彩园邨逮捕了其中一名嫌犯。警方目前正积极追缉另一名嫌犯。 当局指出,目前全城严峻抗疫,口罩需求量更是僧多粥少,因此不排除匪徒偷取口罩企图变卖牟利,因此提醒民众提高警惕保护财务,包括个人防护用品如口罩等,避免让贼徒有机可乘。

王乙康: 三年期间,六所大学处理56起性行为不端案

教育部长王乙康周一(5月6日)指出,本地六所自主大学(AUs)在3年期间,共处理42起校园内不端性行为案件,另有14起涉及学生的案件发生在校园外。 2015年发生了17宗案件,2016年18宗,而2017年21宗。 56宗案件中,新加坡国立大学(NUS)占了25宗,2宗发生在拥有自家纪律委员会的耶鲁新加坡国立大学,20宗发生在南洋理工大学(NTU),以及6宗发生在新加坡管理大学(SMU)。新加坡科技设计大学(STUD)、新加坡理工学院(SIT)和新加坡社会科学大学(SUSS)各一宗。 王乙康表示,其中37宗案件涉及偷拍和录影弱势群体。 部长在回应国会议员林谋泉和朱倍庆,以及非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)询问有关发生在自主大学,涉及学生的不端性行为案件数据和大学教学纪律框架时,如是指出。 他表示,每间自主大学发生的案例与其学生数量有密切关系。他说道,在过去三年中,每1000名学生中涉及不端性行为案件的学生犯罪者比例为0.21、0.21和0.2,显示“没有明显的增加趋势”。 两方展开调查和惩罚 56宗案件中,37宗案件的受害者向警方报案。四宗案件尚在调查中,两宗案件没有足够证据提出控诉。剩下的31宗案件中,10宗属于“严重罪行”,且被判入狱10天至8个月之间,这包括了暴力对待受害者和多次窥视案件。 除了警方调查,校方也展开纪律处分程序,并在其权利范围内进行一系列处罚。王乙康指出,有关的处罚包括了官方谴责,将直接影响到学生的正式教学记录上,导致停学和开除学籍。 56宗案件中,有五宗正在等待进行纪律听证会,而有四名学生在接受制裁前,已经退学。 在剩下的47宗案件中,34宗案件接到官方谴责,26宗被罚长达两个学期的停学处分,而20宗的干案者直接被禁止步入学生宿舍。王乙康表示,有关的数据加起来并不是47宗,因为多数案件接受一系列处罚。…

Netizens angry with ICA for traffic jams at Tuas and Woodlands checkpoints

It was reported that over the weekend (14-15 Dec), a traffic nightmare…

收“压惊红包“视为贿赂,31人遭贪污调查局严厉警告

日前万礼火化场有员工被指收“压惊红包”,触犯《防止贪污法令》,遭贪污调查局调查。昨日(19日)贪污调查局表示经调查,判处员工们获严厉警告(stern warning)。 贪污局续指,去年10月,接获环境局举报,指该火化场出现收取“压惊红包”贪污行为,涉及17名在火化场工作的环境局职员,与14名殡葬业者。 其中17名环境局职员,被指从殡葬董事与灵车司机受贿,换取火化程序更顺利,因而获得得严厉警告。由此,亦违反了《公务员指导手册》,需接受部门纪律处分。 另14名殡葬业者中,其中两人则涉及教唆行为,以红包形式贿赂,违反了《预防腐败法》,获严厉警告;12名则以红包形式贿赂环境局职员,而获得严厉警告。 尽管两名环境局资深长官没有实行受贿行为,但也因两人知情不报,故将面对环境局的纪律行动。 据《海峡时报》报导,这些雇员之所以仅收到警告,不被起诉,其因缺乏有力证据证明他们严重失职,或对不向他们支付“红包“的家庭有不利的行为。 一旦经起诉定罪,他们将可能面临最高五年监禁,或罚款10万新元,或两者兼施。 贪污调查局于文内强调,任何投诉与举报将会被严正以待,无论是何种受贿性质与价值,将经侦查确定是否构成受贿罪行,即指赠送与接受礼品并不构成受贿罪,但其行为意图是为了换取利益,将被视为受贿。 收取一元也可被视为是受贿 去年12月,两名Cogent Container…