Source: Indonesia Investments

JAKARTA, INDONESIA — Indonesia is in the process of ratifying the EFTA-Indonesia Economic Comprehensive Partnership Agreement (IE-CEPA) with Switzerland, marking a positive sign to the archipelagic country’s palm oil sector — dubbed as the culprit of deforestation.

The referendum in Switzerland held in early March showed that 51.7 per cent of the votes supported the free trade agreement with Indonesia, meaning that the prosperous European country would remove import duty on Indonesia’s crude palm oil (CPO) as long as the palm oil exported meets the required standards of sustainability.

Several non-profit organisations in Switzerland are protesting the import of CPO from Indonesia, alleging Indonesia’s CPO sector is behind the massive deforestation and labour rights’ exploitation.

RSPO-certified CPO the best option?

Executive Director at Orangutan Land Trust, Michelle Desilets stated that only Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO)-certified products are allowed to enter Europe.

“I am not well-versed on that. However, what I understand is that RSPO-certified palm oil is duty-free. RSPO is a robust and the most accepted standard,” Desilets told TOC, adding that Swiss NGOs are outspoken on environmental issues.

When asked what Swiss NGOs are actually demanding, Desilets, who has travelled to Borneo many times, claimed that she was not unsure about what they want.

“Perhaps those NGOs think that RSPO is not strong enough and we disagree on that,” she added.

RSPO is an association, comprising several organisations from various palm oil-related industries, is aimed at developing and implementing global standards for sustainable palm oil.

Economist Fadhil Hasan said that the negotiation on IE-CEPA took about 12 years due to the controversy of palm oil, even though CPO is only a small part of the agreement.

“People tend to focus on the CPO factor. The comprehensive partnership has a wide scope. Whereas Indonesia’s CPO is only a small part of the agreement. However, CPO becomes a crucial factor due to protests from NGOs,” Fadhil told TOC.

Indonesia’s CPO export to Swiss is small, about hundreds of tonnes. It is stipulated in the Swiss Ordinance that only RSPO-certified CPO can be exported.

“However, we still hope that Indonesia Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) can be included too,” Fadhil, who was the Director of Corporate Affairs at Asian Agri.

It is very common for civil society organisations in Switzerland to propose a referendum on certain issues such as environmental protection as long as they gain a large number of signatories and support.

Fadhil explained that seven million tons of palm oil produced in Indonesia have been RSPO-certified.

Controversies around palm oil still continue

Like a double-edged sword, while palm oil may be useful in the manufacturing process of many everyday goods from household to food products, green organisations have raised alarm on how the palm oil sector is damaging forests, harming the environment and exploiting labour rights.

The European Union (EU) banned the use of palm oil for energy sources as Indonesia’s palm oil for biodiesel produces more emissions than fossil fuels themselves.

It is planning to reduce the use of palm oil-based biodiesel gradually to zero per cent by 2030.

The Indonesian Oil Palm Association (GAPKI) claimed that palm oil only occupies 17 million hectares of land, smaller than any plant-based oil reaching 278 million hectares worldwide.

One question arises: How can consumers ensure that they purchase only eco-friendly CPO-related products?

Satellite technologies may be useful in monitoring what’s happening on the ground. Tracing technology can be applied to spot any problems that may come up.

However, Desilets said that not all products may bear RSPO certification.

“(They may pass off the product as though) they are doing the right things, (but) they don’t have anything to show it,” Desilets said, adding that World Wildlife Fund (WWF) scorecard is a great option to show whether companies are committed to using 100 per cent RSPO palm oil.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Devastating oil glut sends prices into negative, Wall Street down

by John Biers US oil prices crashed to unprecedented lows Monday as…

Lee Weiling: “I continue to be ashamed at Hsien Loong’s disrespect for his father’s dying wish”

Expressing her disgust over a report by the Sunday Times, Dr Lee…

年收入鸿沟67倍 部长“养廉” 基层穷忙

本地公务员下月将获得半个月年中花红,以及一次性300元奖励。月薪介于1千250至1千581元的第五级公务员,也能同时获得额外加薪20元。该部认为,这是政府持续支持低薪公务员的承诺。 不过,若进一步想,这些公务员在扣除20巴仙公积金后,真正带回家的每月收入,只有1008新元。 相比之下,我国总理的年薪达到220万新元,与初级公务员1万6250新元(1千250月薪X13个月(一个月花红))的年薪相比,足足多了135倍! 加拿大总理年薪为34万7400元,当地的垃圾工人年薪4万9400元,薪资差距也只有7倍。 在我国“高薪养廉”政策下,我国部长级人马薪资堪称全球最高,总理与基层公务员收入天壤之别,足以显见高高在上的领导人,与草根民众之间巨大的财富鸿沟。 1973年至今,部长年薪调涨34倍 若我们回顾1973年,当时的部长年薪为5万8500新元(月薪4500新元X13个月)。但是时至今日,MR4初级部长,年薪已经达到110万新元。 这意味着,初级部长工作一天的收入,就是初级公务员月薪(1千250新元)的2.4倍。至于MR1高级部长日薪,更是初级公务员月薪的3.8倍! 此外,部长还可获得1个月常年可变花红、3个月个人表现花红和3个月国家表现花红。至于总理,则获得6个月的国家表现花红。 减国债 马内阁自愿减薪10% 远的不说,且来看看邻国马来西亚:…

Josephine Teo: Jobs Support Scheme helps to prevent unemployment rate or retrenchments to spike

In its labour market report for the first quarter, the Ministry of…