One month has past since the 2020 General Election (GE) was held on 10 July last month.

During the GE, one of the most stunning event that happened was the withdrawal of People’s Action Party (PAP)’s candidate Ivan Lim from the election.

It started after PAP announced on 26 June the candidacy of Ivan Lim to contest in 2020 GE. He is the General Manager at Keppel Offshore & Marine and was slated to contest in Jurong GRC. DPM Heng Swee Keat even praised Lim saying that he has had a very unusual journey in his education.

During the introduction, Lim told the media that he is concerned about “elderly residents and children”. “I chose to serve with PAP because the PAP values and attributes are close to my heart. In particular, being compassionate, and also being self-reliant on the ground,” he said.

Not long after his introduction, stories of his past started to surface (‘Online comments emerge that PAP new candidate Ivan Lim allegedly a “How Lian” character‘).

A Facebook user, Bryant Wong, shared that Lim was allegedly the commanding officer of his battalion and would speak “using a condescending voice” to tell others not to step into the air-conditioned tentage that he was using. “His action and speech were simply that of an elitist,” Mr Wong wrote.

“There were other instances during Battalion briefings where he would always [pepper] the briefings with his personal achievement (how he is a GM at shipyard, how many people reporting to him at work, etc).”

“He [Mr Lim] was never well liked by the soldiers and commanders of the Battalion due to his constant ‘humble brag’ and driving around camp in his expensive cars,” Mr Wong further noted. “So now he is going into politics to represent the ordinary folks in Parliament. With his character and personality – will he?”

Other netizens commented that Lim’s alleged “bad character” can be found all over on Facebook with negative remarks supposedly coming from his poly classmates, colleagues at Keppel as well as people serving with him during NS and reservist days. Some said he was a “shame” to PAP.

PM Lee: PAP will investigate

On 27 June, PAP suddenly announced that Lim has withdrawn from contesting in 2020 GE.

Two days later on 29 June, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told everyone that PAP will investigate the allegations against Lim after GE. But he also expressed confidence in his party’s recruitment process and cautioned against a culture of “trial by internet” of candidates.

“I don’t think that should be the end of the matter because we can’t let such serious things be said about somebody and have somebody live with the cloud permanently hanging over him (with) a question mark. I think it would be unfair to Ivan,” he added.

“It sets a very damaging precedent that you can condemn somebody and write him off on the basis of an internet campaign. We don’t have time to settle it now, but we can’t simply write off and destroy people like this,” he asserted.

“So, after the elections, the party will investigate the veracity of allegations against Ivan and we will come to a view on the matter.”

With regard to PAP’s recruitment process, PM Lee said PAP has a good process. “We have good candidates. And we have confidence in how the process has worked this time and in the candidate line-up that we have produced and presented to you this election,” he said.

“We have confidence in our system and our candidates. If problems come up, we will look at them.”

The oppositions were able to make headway in the recent GE by winning 2 GRCs, Aljunied GRC and Sengkang GRC, this time. Overall, PAP’s percentage share of valid votes has dropped considerably from 69.9% in 2015 GE to 61.2% in the recent one.

If Ivan Lim had not withdrawn from 2020 GE, he would likely have been an MP in Jurong GRC by now, since he was riding on the coattail of popular PAP minister Tharman contesting at Jurong.

Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

年长屋主售屋所得填公积金退休户头6万元 可获乐龄安居花红最高3万元

国家发展部长兼财政部第二部长黄循财,昨天(4日)在国会宣布,未来年长屋主售组屋套现,在乐龄安居花红(Silver Housing Bonus)下可获最高三万元花红。 他指出屋主未必是“大屋换小屋”,只要购买三房式组屋或更小单位,用售屋所得填补公积金退休户头,就能获得上述花红。 黄循财举例,住在成熟区三房式组屋的年长者,若购买非成熟区三房式组屋单位、且能从售屋套利,就可获得花红。 在乐龄安居花红下,屋主只需填补公积金退休户头六万元。过去则需取决于户头存款额和卖屋所得,有时可能要填补超过六万元。 事实上,过去民间就已呼吁当局对屋契回购计划理应更弹性化,特别是乐龄群体本来财务管理选择不多,有者公积金户口本来就没有多少储蓄,且急需现钱用在医疗和退休生活开销。 黄循财称,这是当局在收集到公众反馈后,作出的调整。他表示,其中民众指该计划复杂,设下好几个条件,故此当局检讨后决定简化勒令安居花红。 另一方面,屋契回购计划也配合上述调整,从下月1日起,,加入屋契回购计划的年长屋主,可获花红将增半,到介于7千500元至3万元之间,视组屋类型而定。

Educate cyber citizens??

We must adapt ourselves to it, and use it to educate and…

忆述大学时期表达诉求经历 前官委议员戴尚志劝青年“当负责任的异议者”

上月中旬,因耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程,引起本地学术界乃至社会群众热议。此前教育部长王乙康在国会称,教育部不能容许学府展开“有议程的活动”。 他引述亚菲言在本月5日(周六)的贴文,指后者提到复兴“新加坡学生运动”,特别是在“政治自觉化”等领域。 “负责有关课程的个人可以保有对新加坡的看法,甚至公开在社交媒体,但我们是否应让这种政治异议存在于我们的教育中?” 不过,巡回大使许通美教授非议王乙康的说法,认为后者不应妖魔化亚菲言,并指他是新加坡的“友爱批评者”。 对于异议课程被腰斩风波,前官委议员、法律学者戴尚志博士亦在日前于脸书分享其个人观点。 目前仍在新加坡智囊机构国际事务研究所担任主席的戴尚志,认为近期的论述主要分为三点: 有关教授和教育争议性课题的范畴 有关写作人和批判类文艺的自由 青年人与异议 从1984年反对政府优生政策谈起 戴尚志回溯35年前(1984年),新加坡政府推出争议性的“优生”政策“毕业妈妈政策”(Graduate Mother…

林厝港码头与克兰芝出现大量死鱼

今天在林厝港码头至克兰芝的西北部海域出现了大量死去的野生鱼。 拍摄以上的照片的公众人士,说当时她在现场看到三个人忙于清理海岸上的垃圾和死鱼。 他们说他们是清理垃圾而已,必须要等到高潮带来所有的死鱼后才清除高潮线。因为没有收集的死鱼将由潮集聚起来。 据说,有一些渔农也损失了渔场的鱼只。 上个周末,东部海域多家养鱼场出现大量鱼只死亡事件。有渔农估计,今年的死鱼量高达400公吨,是历年来损失最严重的一次。据了解,柔佛海峡东部共有64家岸外渔场。 政府部门解释鱼的死亡解释是因为是海里的浮游生物大量繁殖,与海洋生物争氧气,最终导致鱼群缺氧死去。 但有的渔农说浮游生物产生毒素,导致鱼只死去。英文报,TODAY委托试验室对的海水的化验,证实了渔农说提出的推断是有所根据。但试验室说虽然浮游生物产生毒素能导致鱼只死亡,但对人是非致命。 去年2月,东部和西部海域的渔场也发生相似状况,东部的34家渔场和柔佛海峡西部另5家渔场都遭殃,死鱼约160公吨。 照片来源 http://wildshores.blogspot.sg/