Minister Josephine Teo has rejected The Online Citizen Asia’s (TOCA) application to cancel the correction direction issued on 5 July, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) informed the publication via email on Wednesday (22 July).

In a statement on 5 July, the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) Office stated that Aubeck Kam – the Permanent Secretary for the MOM and the Minister’s alternate authority – has instructed the Office to issue correction directions to NUSS video, TOCA’s Facebook post and video, CNA’s online article, and New Naratif’s audio recording.

The POFMA Office noted that the issuance of correction direction was due to the false statements made by Dr Paul Ananth Tambyah who stated the following:

  • Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) email advisory to employers on testing of migrant workers was made without the advice from public health medical professionals
  • MOM‘s advisory stated that employers would lose their work pass privileges if they brought their workers for COVID-19 testing
  • MOM actively discouraged the testing of workers

The correction directions were issued to two of TOCA videos – “TOCA GE2020 Livestream – Afternoon session 2 July 2020” and “Dr Paul Tambyah reveals MOM’s role in outbreak of COVID-19 within dormitories”that were published on 4 July.

It noted that Dr Tambyah has implied in the videos that the MOM did not consult the Ministry of Health or public health professionals before informing employers that they would be penalised for testing their workers.

The justification given by Aubeck Kam was that the Minister had clarified in a Facebook post that the MOM advisory was sent out at the request of the MOH.

Meanwhile, TOCA had filed its application to cancel the correction direction on 17 July to the Minister of Manpower, stating that Dr Tambyah’s statements in the video were based on the fact that the MOM did warn the employers via email not to send their migrant workers for COVID-19 testing.

As for Dr Tambyah’s remarks that said, “There’s a result of which the Ministry of Health is blindsided”, TOCA explained that the context of his comments was that the MOH became unaware of the number of migrant workers who are infected with the virus due to the workers not being sent for testing.

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former diplomat Bilahari Kausikan questions Dr Thum Ping Tjin’s loyalty to Singapore

Singapore’s former Ambassador-at-Large Mr Bilahari Kausikan has called into question Singaporean historian…

Collapsed lift ceiling at Sengkang East injures 10-yr-old girl, results in five stitches on foot

TODAY reports a 10-year-old girl was given five stitches on her foot after…

The City Harvest Arrests – Understanding the Workings of Religion and Government Intervention

By Roy Ngerng – Pastor Kong Hee’s arrest and the arrest of four other…

反对调高消费税 毕丹星:公开数据,让百姓评断该不该涨

在上周参与国会2020财案辩论时,工人党秘书长毕丹星重申该党反对调涨消费税的立场,并呼吁政府应更透明地公开财政数字。 毕丹星在致词中也申诉,过去之所以该党都在质询储备金的数额,乃是为了能探讨储备如何更好地改善低收入国民的处境。但在上一次财案,王瑞杰对为什么不能披露储备金,做了冗长答复。 他当时以《商业时报》的一篇报导,引述人民希望对储备金有更广泛的讨论。他认为这种要求更多透明度的呼声,未来几年都还会延续下去。更何况这也与官方“群策群力,共创未来”的精神相呼应,由国人担起责任,共同探索财政解决方案。 毕丹星重申,消费税时会直接冲击中低收入百姓、甚至那些退休、乐龄人士的税赋。 回溯2018年,工人党在国会调涨消费税,正是因为缺乏有关其他替代收入来源的信息。财长曾表示,一个人未必需要掌握所有信息才能作出决定。但是,今年财案的声明和明年不调高消费税的决定,很显然政府仍需依靠预估收入与指出才能做出判断。 “政府会公开这些预估(数据),好让新加坡老百姓也能批判地判断,到底有没有调涨消费税的必要?” 他说,相信这种开放资讯,有助对我国财政权衡课题有更实质性的对话和理解。 不公开储备金是为保护国家 去年2月,在国会总结2019财案辩论时,王瑞杰指出这些储备可作为战略防御,阻止那些有心破坏新加坡和新加坡利益的群体。此举能够预防犹如货币投机或其他类似的攻击。 当时毕丹星同样也询问有关新加坡储备金的数据,以便人们能够更清楚了解预算案的政策权衡时,王瑞杰表示他“被误导了”。 “我们的储备金,包括新加坡金融管理局(MAS)、新加坡政府投资公司(GIC),以及淡马锡控股公司的资产。金融管理局和淡马锡控股的规模是公共资讯,只有政府投资公司的部分没有透露,那是因为一旦有了相关的数据,我国的储备金基本一览无遗。”