Photo – Institute of Policy Studies

Singapore’s former Ambassador-at-Large Mr Bilahari Kausikan has called into question Singaporean historian Dr Thum Ping Tjin’s loyalty to the country after the latter had “invited” Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad to “interfere” in “Singapore’s internal politics”.

In his commentary on a SMRT Feedback by The Vigilanteh Facebook post which he had shared yesterday (4 Sep), Mr Kausikan raised the question of “which is his country and who are his people?” in response to Dr Thum’s declaration of “I love my country and my people”.

Dr Thum’s declaration was made in light of allegations of being “traitorous” hurled against him by certain factions in Singapore, most notably PAP MP Seah Kian Peng, as a result of the following Facebook post:

Mr Kausikan had also accused Dr Thum of having “a slippery character”, and went on to provide a chronological account of Dr Thum’s previous references to “Malaya”, which Mr Kausikan deems to be “a loaded reference, which, as a historian, he should recognise”, and thus “cannot be accidental”.

He added: “At least the [comic] artist Sonny Liew has publicly admitted he should have used better judgement about the meeting. That is at least halfway honest.

But PJ [Dr Thum] is still twisting and turning, trying to slip out of what he has said and done.”

He concluded: “Since he is so enamoured of ‘Malaya’, perhaps he is best described by a movie character of that era: Orang Minyak — Oily Man!”

Netizen’s reaction to Mr Kausikan’s post is a mixed bag, with many Singaporeans agreeing with his line of reasoning, while a few provided counter-arguments.

Shahana Sakura wrote:

Sir, I understand your position and where you are coming from. There is indeed a risk that foreign governments might try to influence Singapore politics. The threat is real. As an example, we have seen how China (proclaiming itself as a motherland for all ethnic Chinese) has tried to to influence the politics of bigger countries like Australian and New Zealand using its economic might and network of China-born Australian/New Zealand citizens. Given that Singapore is much smaller, and it has a significant number of China born new-citizens, and an ethnic Chinese majority, we must always be on our guard from China. It’s the same with Malaysia, where the Malaysian politicians have a history of playing up racial/religious issues, which could affect our internal harmony. (I am personally thankful that Mahathir has DAP as a partner, because it somewhat constrains his ability to play up racial/religious issues. However, he can still play up a Malaysian nationalist tune and use economic disputes such as the water dispute, to his advantage). We have a very good reason to be on our guard.

That said, I also believe in due process and I am a bit uncomfortable at the way this whole issue was handled. I personally thought that Mr. Seah’s initial post was not necessary and it only encouraged the online lynch mob. This mentality is dangerous because it can be easily used by our enemies to undermine our society. A society which can start baying for blood based on a single post, can also start riots at a single provocation. In the long run, we don’t want such a volatile society.

Dixon Ong said:

Obviously, Thum is challenging the sovereignty of Singapore.

PengYong Tan commented:

Thum Ping Tjin and Kirsten Han are traitors. If they are so enamored by Malaysia, they should renounce their Singapore citizenship and join Mahathir’s Malaysia.

Steven Tan said:

Xiao ah! No more Malaya, it is Malaysia. He [Dr Thum] is on weed ?

Patrick King wrote:

Can someone who has never stopped wanting Singapore to be back in Malaysia be called patriotic???

SoonKin Chew commented:

Seeking foreigners support amounts to “treason”.

Abdur Raheem said:

Neither Singaporeans nor Malaysians want a union that Thum and Company seem to be enamored of. I need not elaborate on why Singaporeans don’t want it. As for Malaysians, at least of the dominant ethnic group, it is a “poisoned chalice” which will alter the demographic makeup of the country, and with it, will follow the loss of political power. Even if such power is not lost, it leads to a situation where there is a constant contest for primacy. Like what happened between the Greek and Turkish Cypriots, or the multifaceted contest that still goes on between Maronites, Druze, Shiites, and Sunnis in Lebanon. Development will take a back seat and foreign powers will look to exploit the situation. A “New Malaysia” is a dead idea with few buyers.

David Wong commented:

Sonny’s “The Art of Charlie Chan Hock Chye” attempts to re-write Singapore history to their own beliefs. That is why I am taking his “excuse” with a huge pinch of salt. He is a political activist in his own right, and he even admitted to helping [Kirsten] Han and Thum set up that Soros-linked company. Not a completely naive person…

Tze Shiung Ng said:

His revisionist history seems to chime with that of the New Malaysians/Bersihadists: That true independence was idealised by socialists/communists/democrats to the exclusion of everybody else, thus casting doubt on the legitimacy of national Malaysia/Singapore. This has to be challenged, but as one influential Malaysian realist (Lim Sian See) has found, trying to win hearts & minds on social media is futile. I think the reason is because the realist cannot debate the idealist in his mode of language. The irony is, in Malaysia it took a master Machiavellian, but for his own ends, to bag all the idealists in one sweep without their realising it. Their aspirations & frustrations have now been directed to their utopia of New Malaysia, which they are finding is incapable of meeting their demands, including their fancy histories. TPJ does not seem to understand this historical development, and if he believes Mahathir is going to bolster his history for his sake, he will be surprised.

Mike Lui wrote:

Perhaps the gang of 4 need to drink Kopi with ISD…
Even Anwar is wary of Mr 10%.
Can a leopard change its spots?
History repeating itself?
So much for “opening Democratic space in South East Asian countries”. Turning into a Big Bull.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Greater resources and support needed for schools and parents of students with mental health issues: Halimah Yacob

Greater resources and support are needed for schools and parents of students…

SIA air stewardess found dead in San Francisco hotel room

A 38-year-old Singapore Airlines (SIA) air stewardess was found dead in her…

【选举】妇女无法投票 竟是官员沟通不良所致!

昨日,一名妇女申诉自己无法投票,因为当她在投票站扫描身份证时,却显示她已经投过票,她只能以蓝色选票(Tendered Ballot Paper)投票,并在较后针对此事报警。 至于今日选举局向媒体澄清,经调查这是一场误会和人为错误,实则是负责的官员出现够同问题。 投票日当天,监票官(Presiding Officer)协助这位林姓女士,用电子系统登记身份证,但试了几次都不成功。其实是因为监票官还没有从上一位选民的电子登记系统登出。 监票官上报副选举官(Assistant Returning Officer)反映此事,但似乎两人间沟通不良,结果副选举官以为林女士的身份证号码,已在早前被用来登记投票,也令林女士产生误会。 选举局称已联系林女士并向她道歉。系统也显示没人盗用林女士身份证号码投票。


再有医护人员确诊,此次受感染的是一名在仁慈医院就任的菲律宾籍护士。 昨日(5月20日)新增病例中,有一病患是现年30岁的仁慈医院菲籍护士,她在出现症状后就没在上班了。 自昨日开始,卫生部已经将住在宿舍外的确诊工作准证持有者列入社区病例中,因此昨日的570新增病例中,有八起社区病例,包括两名新加坡人和永久居民、一名长期证件持有者,以及五名工作准证持有者,剩余的562起病例则是来自客工宿舍的工作准证持有者。 此外,也有两个新增的感染群,分别来自圣诺哥南路29号以及太戈尔巷144号,皆为工业区。 我国至昨日已经累积了2万8794起确诊病例。昨日的出院人数有842人,而入住加护病房的患者增加了一人,达到11人。