On Sat (1 Sep), MP Seah Kian Peng commented on his Facebook page with regard to the recent meeting between Historian Thum Ping Tjin, Freelance journalist Kirsten Han, Activist Jolovan Wham and Award-winning comic artist, Sonny Liew with Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

In his post, Seah took the opportunity to also drag opposition party Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and Function 8 founder Ms Teo Soh Lung into the fray, accusing all of them trying to bring a foreign power to intervene in Singaporean domestic politics. Neither Ms Teo nor SDP members were present at the meeting with Dr Mahathir.

Dr Thum posted a Facebook post on Monday, said that “any notion that I am a traitor to my country is ridiculous and unfounded”, and that he also believes in engaging Singapore’s northern neighbour cordially and with “mutual respect”, particularly as “Malaysia is now a beacon of hope for democracy in Southeast Asia” under the new Pakatan Harapan government.

Activist Kirsten Han, who was also present at the meeting with Dr Mahathir in Putrajaya last Thursday alongside Dr Thum, Wham and Liew, said that no one at the meeting has expressed “the belief that Singapore is a part of Malaysia”, and that Mr Seah’s allegations on the matter were “unfounded”, based on the historical facts she had cited in her blog post regarding the issue.

Ms Han has also expressed her disappointment regarding the mainstream media and PAP online social media channels’ act of sharing the “unfounded” allegation, as “triggering a torrent of accusations of treason” and even “death threats”.

She also wrote in response to Mr Seah’s comment that it is “interesting” that she would associate herself with Dr Thum, declaring that it is “a great honour and privilege to work with someone who cares so much”, adding that Mr Seah should “retract his baseless statements”.

SDP  has responded to Mr Seah’s allegation – “This is what PJ Thum and Teo Soh Lung and the SDP believe in their heart of hearts?” – by confirming that “Dr Thum and Ms Teo are not members of the SDP, thus do not speak for the party, or represent us in any way”, adding that they only came to know of Dr Thum’s meeting with Dr Mahathir “through the media”.

While SDP found Mr Seah’s allegation against the party “bewildering”, SDP believed that Mr Seah’s accusation is merely a tactic to divert Singaporeans’ attention from PAP’s controversies revolving around “ministers’ salaries, the HDB 99-year lease, and the rising cost of living”, and that the allegation was merely a “desperate” and “clumsy stunt” that will not work on the public.

In a blog post last Saturday (1 Sep), Ms Han wrote that “it’s also a little random to drag the Singapore Democratic Party into this, as Soh Lung hasn’t been a member of the party for quite some time”.

Ms Teo Soh Lung, whose name was specifically pointed out by Mr Seah in the latter’s Facebook post, has fired back against Mr Seah’s accusation that “Separately, in a comment on a TOC video post, Teo Soh Lung said that “Singapore is part of Malaya la”, saying that “MP Seah is economical in his citation of the TOC video”, which “is a live stream of a forum held in Johor Bahru on 18 August 2018 and titled “Can Singapore Do a Malaysia?”

Ms Teo retorted by rehashing PAP’s history, saying that “the PAP manifesto in 1954 sought to end colonialism and establish an independent nation state of Malaya comprising the Federation of Malaya and the Colony of Singapore.”

He also expressed his indignation against Mr Seah’s post which he perceived as a means of “instigating his supporters to attack all of us” [Dr Thum, Ms Han, Mr Wham, Mr Liew, and SDP included].

Ms Teo added that Mr Seah’s agenda was to “deliberately mis-inform the public that I am a SDP member. I am not and he knows that. The PAP has a super spy network.”

He pointed out the verbal abuse he had received online as a result of Mr Seah’s post, with people “baying for blood” and threatening him to leave the country for being “traitorous”.

Ms Teo questioned Mr Seah’s integrity as he posed the following questions:

Is this how a responsible Member of Parliament should behave? Is it right for him to incite hatred against citizens? Is a member of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods entitled to spread false information against innocent citizens? Should the Prime Minister take immediate disciplinary action against MP Seah?

Ms Teo concluded by urging MP Seah to “remove his post immediately”.

Ms Han was perplexed as to why Mr Teo’s comment was suddenly brought up, considering that he “wasn’t present at the meeting with Mahathir.”

Mr Sonny Liew responded by stating that they were all “taken by surprise to find out that Hisham [Mr Hishamuddin Rais] had sent out a press alert and that there would be an impromptu press conference after the meeting”.

He elaborated that he had only personally “agreed to proceed once we were assured that those of us (Jolovan, Kirsten and myself) who didn’t want to be part of the press conference could choose to do so – which I thought would mean that we would get to meet Dr. Mahatir in a personal, unpoliticised capacity”.

However, Mr Liew viewed the incident as “an important lesson on negotiating public discourse” and expressed his excitement about having met the Malaysian prime minister in an up-close fashion.

Following the backlash from the public, Mr Seah had issued an apology via Facebook yesterday (3 Sep) to SDP for assuming Teo was still with the party but did not clarify nor retract the other allegations made in his earlier FB post.

Wham did not think too highly of his apology. He responded to Mr Seah’s post via a Facebook comment:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

女子为本地居留权 与本国男子假结婚被捕判半年监禁

42岁中国籍女子为取得我国居留权,与47岁我国男子假结婚,结果东窗事发,判处半年监禁。 根据移民与关卡局(ICA)周三(7日)发文告表示,两人于2015年在娱乐场所相识,当时女子王晓燕(译名,Wang Xiaoyan)正于娱乐场所内工作。 2015年3月,女子的工作证已结束。尽管已離境,但仍然与男子苗成聪(译名,Mow Cheang Chong)保持联系,她仍有意留在新加坡工作,便达成假结婚协议,协助女子申请工作准证,而女子则与男子进行性行为为回报。 兩人于2015年10月28日中国结婚,随后女子于2016年期间经常出入新加坡,而男子则成为女子探访准证的担保人,为女子数次延长女子的居留期限。 2017年2月22日,女子获得长期探访准证(Long Term Visit Pass),申请探访准证期间,男子一再向当局坚称两人已同居,但事实上却没有住在一起。 2017年3月2日,女子位于乌节路的按摩场所中,一次突击检查中被逮捕。经调查后涉嫌与协议结婚有关,便将女子与其“丈夫”转交移民与关卡局,另开案侦办。移民与关卡局随以进入协议婚姻和作出虚假声明,以获取通关证明控诉“夫妻”。…

台湾通过亚洲首个同婚专法

5月17日是“国际不再恐同日”,也是台湾通过同性婚姻合法化的历史性一天。今日同性婚姻专法(5月17)在台立法院通过三读。台湾执政民进党在立法院强力支持该草案,反对党国民党则有多数委员投下反对票。 根据台媒报道,台湾同性婚姻历经多年争议,自2017年起,台湾大法官释宪,要求立法院必须在2年内完成相关修法或制定专法,若未能于今年5月23日达成同性婚姻的平等保护,同性伴侣将可根据《民法》规定结婚,拥有和异性伴侣相同的权力和义务。 台湾立法院日前召开朝野协商,针对不同党员与政府机关提出的草案商讨,其中包括政院版《司法院释字第748号施行法草案》、国民党立委赖士葆版《公投第12案施行法草案》,以及民进党立委林岱桦版《司法院释字第748号解释暨公投第12案施行法草案》 三法律版本差异存于双方关系及收养关系中。例如,双方当事人的关系在民进党版本称为“同性婚姻”,赖士葆版是“同性家属”,而林岱桦版是“同性结合”。行政院草案规定同婚双方可“收养”另一人亲生子女,而其余2版本否定收养权,但可共同“监护”未成年子女。 最终同意通过政院版,并以66同意票,27反对票三读通过,由蔡英文为首的民进党大多投同意票;反对票则大部分由国民党投出。 专法由5月24日开始实施,意味着年满18岁以上的台湾同性伴侣可以依法登记结婚,但专法内并没有未对领养小孩与跨国婚姻多做叙述。 一直以来,同性婚姻课题在台湾备受争议,性别维权团体与反对同性婚姻团体双方各持己见,为了有效解决争议,于去年11月24日举办全民公投结果。根据结果显示,逾70巴仙台湾人民以保障异性婚姻制度而反对同性婚姻法案。因此台湾政府决定不修改民法对婚姻的定义,而是为同性婚姻另立专法。 今日已有逾四万名台湾公民聚集在立法院周遭,包括台湾各地维权团体,声援支持同性婚姻合法化,并全程关注消息出炉。结果出炉后,许多维权团体纷纷表示感谢与支持,而网民也随即患上印有彩虹背景的大头照,庆贺同性婚姻合法化, 总统蔡英文也于社交媒体上为此祝贺。她承认多年来备受争议的同性婚姻问题,已造成台湾公民间的严重分歧,但她强调,目前唯有行政院版草案是与立法院的判决匹配。 虽然如此,反对声浪并未随之减缓,据BBC报道,台湾许多保守教会团体已陆续表达反对同婚法案之意见,批评蔡英文政府不遵守去年台湾公投结果。他们认为公投民意应大于大法官释宪决议,而且国民党也随即谴责蔡英文政府在拖延处理同婚造成对立,故不应仓促通过。

Young lawyer at 28 already saddled with $1.1 million mortgage loan

South China Morning Post reported yesterday that as the era of ultra-low…