Dr Liu Thai Ker (Screenshot from CNA’s interview footage)

In an interview with the Chinese media published last Friday (17 Jul), former Housing Development Board (HDB) and Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) CEO Liu Thai Ker said that the 10 million population number was always a planning parameter and not a target for Singapore (‘GE2020: 10 million population not a goal but a planning parameter, says Liu Thai Ker‘).

He said that the 10 million figure was not a goal but the worst-case scenario. “In case of reaching 10 million, we are prepared,” he said. “Otherwise, if it is discovered that 10 million is a real need, then it will be too late.”

He pointed out that when he led URA to develop the Concept Plan in 1991, he thought that the country’s population would hit 5.5 million in 100 years – an estimate that came true 70 years ahead of time. Singapore’s population is now already 5.7 million.

Still, he said that if Singapore is to accommodate 10 million, then the population density will have to increase by 30 per cent – something which will not impact people adversely if planning starts now. He urged Singaporeans to not just see the negatives but also the positive contributions by foreign immigrants.

Liu says Singapore population “obviously” going to grow beyond 6.9 million

The controversy over 10 million population was ignited back in 2014 when Liu openly said that Singapore should plan for a population of 10 million at a public seminar (‘Singapore should plan for population of 10m‘, 1 Aug 2014).

In fact, he told the audience that Singapore should not stop its population growth projection at the 6.9 million figure listed in the Population White Paper. “That is an interim figure and projection and obviously Singapore is going to grow beyond that,” he said.

That is to say, in his view, Singapore’s population is “obviously” going to grow and exceed the 6.9 million number. He also added that Singapore was not as mature as those Scandinavian economies and therefore still needs immigration to grow the population.

Then in 2017, Liu told The New Paper in an interview that he stood by what he said in 2014 (‘Ex-HDB chief: Singapore must still aim for population of 10 million‘, 8 Nov 2017). He said at the time, “You cannot stop population growth, because as long as your economy is booming and you create new jobs, you need new population.”

No contact with government?

In the interview published last Friday, Liu repeatedly told the media multiple times that he had no contact with the Government or political leaders after he left public service in 1992, and the 10 million figure was his personal opinion.

The 10 million population controversy erupted again during election campaigning of GE 2020. Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said he did not say that Singapore should plan to increase its population to 10 million, nor did he mention the figure. In fact, the Singapore population is likely to be significantly below 6.9 million by 2030, He said.

In fact, Heng even posted a video to prove that he did not mention the 10 million figure at all during the said dialogue at NTU.

But interestingly, Heng did mention that he had met Liu:

“But seriously on the population issue, 6.9 million number that was put out earlier on. In fact, I met Mr Liu Thai Ker, our former chief planner, I think he had publicly said, it has been reported in the papers that we should go for even higher number and that how this little red dot can accommodate many more people. Now whether this little red dot can accommodate many more people actually is not strictly just a physical constraint. We cannot be thinking of 50 million people on this little red dot because it will just be so dense and unpleasant… But the population number is not just about physical space, it is also about the social space, it is about the sense of togetherness.”

Video (see 0:50):

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

China’s CDC head admits low protection rate of Chinese vaccines at forum but backtracks later

Concern is mounting that China’s COVID-19 vaccines are less effective raising questions…

Malaysian man tries to smuggle in cigarette boxes in between slices of bread

Busting yet another attempt at smuggling in duty-unpaid cigarettes, the Immigration &…

AHPETC Chairman’s Review

The following was published on the Workers’ Party website on Monday. THE…

因脸书分享一贴文 时评人梁实轩遭总理提控诽谤

因为在个人脸书专页分享一篇文章惹祸,本地知名时评人、金融服务专业协会前主席梁实轩,遭总理李显龙提告诽谤。 梁实轩是在11月初,分享了誌期11月5日的State Times Review(STR)文章,标题为《李显龙成为一马公司弊案主要调查对象》。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 据了解,资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)在11月6日致函梁实轩,指其文章违反网络行为准则,要求后者在六小时内撤下有关文章。梁实轩也遵守IMDA的要求。 《网络公民》查询其他也分享同一篇文章的网民,却没有收到资媒局的警告信。 在11月12日,德尊(新加坡)法律事务所致函梁实轩,要求他对总理李显龙公开道歉,并赔偿后者名誉损失。 信函称:“这些指控都是不实和无根据的,对我们的客户造成严重诽谤,诋毁他的人格、信誉和诚信,”由资深律师达文星领导的李显龙律师团队,认为梁实轩发布的贴文,明显含有“恶意损害其客户”的成分。 根据《海峡时报》报导,法庭文件指文章中“意味且可被理解为,原告腐败地滥用总理职务,帮助纳吉清洗一马公司的数十亿元资金。” 作为单一的个案,梁实轩的脸书贴文被指含有诽谤词语“意味且可被理解为,原告与一马公司弊案的犯罪活动同谋。” 李显龙的代表律师称,这些词语“不实且毫无根据,并且有意诋毁身为总理的原告。”…