Dr Liu Thai Ker (Screenshot from CNA’s interview footage)

In an interview with the Chinese media published last Friday (17 Jul), former Housing Development Board (HDB) and Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) CEO Liu Thai Ker said that the 10 million population number was always a planning parameter and not a target for Singapore (‘GE2020: 10 million population not a goal but a planning parameter, says Liu Thai Ker‘).

He said that the 10 million figure was not a goal but the worst-case scenario. “In case of reaching 10 million, we are prepared,” he said. “Otherwise, if it is discovered that 10 million is a real need, then it will be too late.”

He pointed out that when he led URA to develop the Concept Plan in 1991, he thought that the country’s population would hit 5.5 million in 100 years – an estimate that came true 70 years ahead of time. Singapore’s population is now already 5.7 million.

Still, he said that if Singapore is to accommodate 10 million, then the population density will have to increase by 30 per cent – something which will not impact people adversely if planning starts now. He urged Singaporeans to not just see the negatives but also the positive contributions by foreign immigrants.

Liu says Singapore population “obviously” going to grow beyond 6.9 million

The controversy over 10 million population was ignited back in 2014 when Liu openly said that Singapore should plan for a population of 10 million at a public seminar (‘Singapore should plan for population of 10m‘, 1 Aug 2014).

In fact, he told the audience that Singapore should not stop its population growth projection at the 6.9 million figure listed in the Population White Paper. “That is an interim figure and projection and obviously Singapore is going to grow beyond that,” he said.

That is to say, in his view, Singapore’s population is “obviously” going to grow and exceed the 6.9 million number. He also added that Singapore was not as mature as those Scandinavian economies and therefore still needs immigration to grow the population.

Then in 2017, Liu told The New Paper in an interview that he stood by what he said in 2014 (‘Ex-HDB chief: Singapore must still aim for population of 10 million‘, 8 Nov 2017). He said at the time, “You cannot stop population growth, because as long as your economy is booming and you create new jobs, you need new population.”

No contact with government?

In the interview published last Friday, Liu repeatedly told the media multiple times that he had no contact with the Government or political leaders after he left public service in 1992, and the 10 million figure was his personal opinion.

The 10 million population controversy erupted again during election campaigning of GE 2020. Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat said he did not say that Singapore should plan to increase its population to 10 million, nor did he mention the figure. In fact, the Singapore population is likely to be significantly below 6.9 million by 2030, He said.

In fact, Heng even posted a video to prove that he did not mention the 10 million figure at all during the said dialogue at NTU.

But interestingly, Heng did mention that he had met Liu:

“But seriously on the population issue, 6.9 million number that was put out earlier on. In fact, I met Mr Liu Thai Ker, our former chief planner, I think he had publicly said, it has been reported in the papers that we should go for even higher number and that how this little red dot can accommodate many more people. Now whether this little red dot can accommodate many more people actually is not strictly just a physical constraint. We cannot be thinking of 50 million people on this little red dot because it will just be so dense and unpleasant… But the population number is not just about physical space, it is also about the social space, it is about the sense of togetherness.”

Video (see 0:50):

Subscribe
Notify of
38 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Four more dorms gazetted as isolation areas for COVID-19; total 25 dorms

The Tuas South Dormitory, Jurong Penjuru Dormitory 2, CDPL Tuas Dormitory and…

We’ve got to support Singaporeans being spontaneous, being unconventional. – PM Lee

“Engage your ideals, your ideas, your energies, build a new generation, build…

【冠状病毒19】7月14日增一死亡病例 六旬男因冠毒并发症逝世

本地昨日(7月14日)新增一冠状病毒19死亡病例,为一名62岁的男病患,死于冠毒并发症。 他也是我国第27起冠毒死亡病例。 据卫生部文告指出,死者是本地公民。他于4月30日确诊,生前已患有糖尿病、高血压和高血脂病史。 盛港综合医院已经和死者家属取得联系,并将为他们提供需要的援助。

停止用“好吃懒做”刻板印象简化街友问题

工人党非选区议员吴佩松分享他尝试协助街友的经历:他被居民告知有街友以纸皮包裹御寒,卷缩在组屋底楼一角休息,旁边还有他的一些物品,和挂着他的衬衫。好几次吴佩松尝试找到这位街友,都没见着。   “他们露宿或许都有原因,有的可能是有家归不得;有的有面对一些困难,虽然知道政府有援助,但不愿求助;一些是因为从事工时长工作,想在外头合个眼休息。有些则只想独处。”   也是一名社会学者的吴佩松透露,在协助工人党前党魁暨阿裕尼集选区议员刘程强在选区工作期间,也有遇到一些街友。一些居民可能视街友为不速之客,是市镇会该处理的问题;而一些人同情,但不知怎么帮助他们。   吴佩松坦言,自己也只能尽量尝试提供他们帮助,他说曾劝阻一名要在组屋底层扎营的街友,因为这会影响其他街坊,并答应带他去社会与家庭发展部(MSF)寻求帮助,不过这位街友则会去和朋友同住。   而另一街友个案,则是住在组屋底层闲置的学习区。吴佩松尝试找他,发现他的随身物品整齐地对方桌上,吴佩松留了名片请街友联系他,但隔天街友就离开了,令他感到懊悔,说以后也不留名片,而是希望能和他们见面,好好谈谈。 根据今年初的国会问答,社会与家庭发展部在2015-2017年之间,平均每年协助385名街友个案。 可能有些人对街友的刻板印象都认为街友是好吃懒做、无业游民等等,结果才会沦落露宿街头。 部分街友有工作、甚至有房子…