For People’s Voice (PV) After Work Facebook Live broadcast on Tuesday (29 June), the party chief Lim Tean explained that they had a “hectic and frantic” day because the next day (30 June) would be Nomination Day.

Mr Lim started out his evening broadcast by noting that the People’s Action Party (PAP) had announced their lineup for the upcoming General Election (GE). He expressed that this would be the first time the PAP did not announce their lineup “way in advance”.

“I see that the PAP have today started to finally announce their lineup and it’s incredible. It’s incredible because this is the first time in living memory, as far as I’m concerned, where I have seen the PAP not announce their lineup way in advance as they have done in the past.”

He went on to claim that the PAP was trying to find out where the alternative parties’ candidates will be contesting, and he believes that this is a “sign of weakness”.

“Obviously they were trying to suss out where the opposition candidates are going, it is a sign of weakness.”

“You are seeing a very weak PAP team being put up for GE2020.”

Ivan Lim’s withdrawal from GE and the hypocrisy behind it

Other than claiming that the PAP was unsure of their capabilities, the PV chief mentioned that there had been some “amazing turnaround” by the PAP.

He recalled how one of PAP’s candidates, Ivan Lim, withdrew from the GE, and it occurred because his sub-ordinates exposed and criticised his “arrogant, selfish and elitist” attitude on social media.

“I think that is a fair way of putting it one of their candidates Ivan withdrew Ivan limb, and that was because the netizens got hold of his past conduct through complaints made by his subordinates.

Seeing how the ruling party felt like the treatment Mr Lim had received was unfair, the PV chief pointed out the hypocrisy when PAP “loves to smear opposition candidates and leaders”, while they would not want that to occur to themselves.

The Prime Minister says we should investigate this, the rhetoric coming out of the PAP is that he treatment he received was unfair. The PAP loves to smear opposition candidates and opposition leaders, but they don’t like it when their own candidate are receiving that type of treatment.”

Indranee Rajah’s remarks on NCMP seats

Moving on, the lawyer talked about the issue where PAP’s Indranee Rajah made remarks about having “12 opposition seats in Parliament at a minimum” in addition to Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs), and PAP can’t be “assumed to make a clean sweep” of the Parliamentary seats.

Her remarks implied that Singaporeans do not need to vote for the alternative parties since these parties have Parliamentary seats “guaranteed”.

Mr Lim urged people to not be “fooled” by the PAP member’s persuasion to influence Singaporeans to avoid voting for the alternative parties.

“Don’t ever allow Indranee Rajah to fool you.”

“That has been the narrative of the PAP for the better part of two decades now in order to persuade Singaporeans that there is no need to vote in the opposition.”

“The whole rationale is that they want and iron grip on power because when it comes to power it is the numbers in Parliament.

He slammed that it was a display of “selfish interest to cling on total power”.

Singaporeans losing freedom

By allowing a party to have “total power”, Mr Lim explained that Singaporeans would “lose total control” on their CPF, by pointing out the Government’s failure to keep their initial promise to return the CPF at 55 years old.

The party chief noted that this is a freedom issue, especially regarding how Singaporeans wish to retire and live their lives. He went on to stress that people should not be working into their 70s and 80s.

An observation he had also made was about how Singaporeans gave the ruling party “overwhelming power”. This resulted in shutting down people’s freedom of expression in this nation. He believes that this is “absolutely dangerous”.

Mr Lim asked fellow Singaporeans if this is what they want for their future generations where the nation is “increasingly constricted”, adding that many Singaporeans decided to leave the country due to the lack of freedom.

One of the viewers commented on how Singapore’s President was “installed”, not “elected”. The party chief emphasised on the issue with giving the ruling party “overwhelming power”, which in turn, would give them the rights to “change the constitution at will”.

“That affects your life. That affects your freedom. That affects your dignity.

And I know so many of you are so upset because you have come up to me and express those sentence to say you were so upset that you were not allowed to vote for your president in 2016.”

He suggested that Singaporeans can change that by “drastically redrawing the balance of power” in Parliament in the upcoming GE.

Mr Lim urged Singaporeans to “be brave” and not let fear overcome them.

“I ask you to be brave, not only for yourselves, friends and family. I ask you to be brave for the future of our next generation and the society we want to see emerge.”

Based on his observation on the ministers’ “arrogant” behaviour and attitude displayed by Grace Foo, Chan Chun Sing, Josephine Teo, and Teo Chee Hean, the PV chief stressed that a politician “is always the servant” and “never a master”.

Mr Lim wrapped up his live broadcast by encouraging Singaporeans to participate in voting.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Malaysia’s ex-PM warned UMNO-PH “forced marriages” will not last long, DAP leader reminds it was on advice by King

Malaysia’s former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob warned against the political coalition between the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) and Pakatan Harapan (PH), saying that “forced marriages will not last long”. He also stressed the importance of a willing coalition, which should be accepted by the grassroots of both parties, to avoid “further damage”. Anthony Loke, the DAP secretary-general, reminded that the cooperation between PH and BN was formed based on the advice of Malaysia’s King, and the coalition is aimed at creating a stable unity government

无感染症状患者传染病毒属个案 武汉肺炎死亡率比SARS低

卫生部长颜金勇表示,尽管出现一些未有感染症状的病患传染他人,但这些仅是个别案例,以目前的情况显示,多数都是病人出现症状后才有可能出现传染的现象。 同时也澄清,新型冠状病毒肺炎的死亡率是2%到3%,比SARS的10%死亡率低,而多数病逝的肺炎病人都有其他健康问题。 昨日(3日)卫生部长在国会上指出病毒是透过病人的唾沫散播开来,因此有可能是病人在咳嗽或打喷嚏时所释放出来的飞沫落在其他地方,而且其病毒可能会残留二至三日。 因此,有人若触碰了这些病毒接触的地方,再用手去揉眼睛和鼻子,便可能会出现感染症状例如发烧或咳嗽,随之在发展成为肺炎。 颜金勇表示,“这意味着,病毒是会从感染者体内释放出飞沫例如咳嗽或打喷嚏,并在短距离内传播,透过用手接触眼睛、鼻子或嘴巴等接触,则可能会被感染。” 然而,无症状的潜在患者要透过咳嗽或打喷嚏传染的可能性不大,反而是“可能接触感染物的表面物品”更有传播的机率。 颜金勇续指这也是为什么目前只隔离确诊病例密切接触潜在患者,对于曾短暂接触确诊病例者,例如可能在商场上经过确诊病例的人,其传播风险较低。 颜金勇也解释,民众在外开始戴口罩的原因在于害怕在公共场合吸入病毒,但他也说明,目前仍未有任何证据证明病毒会透过空气传播。 医护人员也建议最有效的防御措施即是维持个人良好的卫生习惯,经常用肥皂或洗手液吸收,不用手触摸脸部,可以避免感染病毒。 雇主要求员工体检呈证明 此外,有议员反映,部分雇主担心员工感染,要求他们到医院做检查并开出医药证明,而本地医疗机构是否会发出“确认没有感染2019年新型冠状性病毒”的医药证明一事,他也表示,本地医疗机构并不会发出类似的证明,因此呼吁民众切勿随意到医院要求进行检测,因为这会加重医疗机构负担。 颜金勇指出,当局确实是透过检测病患的病毒量来判断患者是否确诊,但病毒是由潜伏期,病人在接受测试时,病毒量可能会非常低,但也有可能会增加变成确诊病例,因此即使检测结果显示没有感染,但也不能直接证明并未受感染。

Razer to hire for about 1,000 positions in its new SEA headquarters in Singapore

Renowned gaming and fintech firm Razer is looking to hire for about…

不满国有媒体报导有误 梁实轩发文澄清仅纯粹分享贴文

被李显龙总理告诽谤的时评人梁实轩,基于本地一些国有媒体针对其诽谤案的报导内容有误,于今日在脸书发贴文,阐述事件来由,并指出自己并未如一些媒体所述,涉撰写有关诽谤总理的文章,自己仅分享之。在接到资讯与媒体发展局(IMDA)的通令后,也已立即撤下。 梁实轩在贴文中指出:“针对有关总理起诉我诽谤的个案,一些国有媒体的报导出现很多不准确之处。” 他认为发布这篇贴文是恰当的,好让国人能准确了解此事,不被在国有媒体所读的内容误导。 他说,在11月8日,他分享了马来西亚新闻网站TheCoverage.my的文章,有关文章与一马公司弊案有关。 “我只是纯粹分享该贴文,从未添加任何评论或修饰有关文章。因此,国有媒体指我撰写了诽谤李总理的文章,是不正确的。” 在11月10日,梁实轩收到了的通令,要求他在六小时内撤下有关贴文,他也照做无误。 “然而,德尊律师事务所的达文星,仍在11月12日向我发律师信,要我针对诽谤总理公开道歉,并赔偿后者损失,令我感到困惑。有关信函指我恶意发布了TheCoverage.my的文章,损害了他的客户。我断然否定了这些指控。” 梁实轩说,就在昨日,有人来到其住处,在前门张挂传讯令和其他法庭文件。帖文中他也上载了这些文件。 梁实轩也指出,自己在今年的11月23日刚满65岁,也属”默迪卡一代”。他说,他把过去20年的黄金岁月,都奉献给在祖国争取基本人权的斗争上,“而言论自由,就是其中一个最根本的人权。”