The proposed wearable device for contract tracing is not a tracking device and will not have GPS capabilities nor mobile internet connectivity, the Minister-in-charge of the Smart Nation initiative Vivian Balakrishnan said in a media briefing on Monday (8 June).

The Minister repeatedly emphasized that the device – which will be named TraceTogether token – will not be able to track users’ movements and locations as it does not have GPS.

“It is not a tracking device. It is not an electronic tag, as some Internet commentaries have fretted about in particular,” said Mr Balakrishnan.

As there would be no internet connectivity in the device, there is no possibility of data being uploaded without the consent of the user, he added.

In fact, the device only uses Bluetooth proximity data which will be encrypted and stored in the phone for up to 25 days before it automatically deleted from the phone.

“It’s worth emphasizing that there isn’t one big giant centralised database. In fact, the data is decentralised and encrypted on phones and on devices and only uploaded if [the user] is positive,” the Minister remarked.

The data will be extracted from the phone if a user is infected with the COVID-19 disease, which Mr Balakrishnan reassured that only a “small number of personnel have access to the data for contact tracing purposes”, adding that they are covered by the Official Secrets Act.

“Even the finite silos of data that are uploaded are protected by the public sector data security recommendations. All the officers involved are covered by the Official Secrets Act and we will continue to audit and make sure no data leakage occurs,” he said.

In addition, Mr Balakrishnan said in Parliament on 5 June that the device will have the same function as the TraceTogether mobile application – which uses Bluetooth proximity data.

He hinted that the new device will be progressively distributed to everyone in Singapore if it works. The first batch of the device will be delivered later this month.

Netizens still “not convinced” that the TraceTogether token is not a tracking device

Despite the Minister had repeatedly emphasized that the wearable device for contact tracing – TraceTogether token – is not a tracking device, many netizens still refused to believe it.

Netizens were quick to criticize Mr Balakrishnan’s remarks on the device as they penned their thoughts under the comments section of Channel News Asia’s YouTube video – covering the media briefing. Some of them commented that the Government is “sugarcoating” to make the device sounds more “acceptable”.

While others are simply not convinced with the Minister’s explanation, noting that they do not want their privacy to be invaded by being tracked by the device.

Noting that the wearable device has no GPS and mobile internet connectivity, one netizen asked whether the Government would still be able to track every wearable device if it sets up Bluetooth signals across the nation.

Another netizen said that the Minister “can fool” the “non-tech savvy” individuals, but those who understand how technology works would know that Bluetooth is “a form of transmission” that can enable tracking. Hence, he implored the Government to use the financial resources on swab tests instead.

Concerns about privacy issue were previously raised by Singaporeans following the wearable device

Meanwhile, the Minister’s announcement on the TraceTogether token had raised some concerns about privacy issues among Singaporeans.

A petition titledSingapore says ‘No’ to wearable devices for COVID-19 contact tracing – rejecting the development of the TraceTogether token – has garnered more than 37,000 signatories at the time of writing.

The Singapore People’s Party (SPP) also released a statement authored by its Assistant Secretary-General Ariffin Sha on 7 June, urging the Government to “tread with utmost caution and regard for the privacy of Singaporeans”.

The Party also raised concerns in relation to cybersecurity issues and highlighted the Government’s recent track record in relation to cybersecurity, noting that it “leaves much to be desired”.

“Privacy is a fundamental right and is about protecting information, not hiding it. A lack of privacy can create very serious risks, at both an individual and national level,” the SPP remarked.

Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Former NCMP Yee Jenn Jong: Local SMEs face stiff competition from GLCs, high costs, and a small market

Local SMEs (small and medium enterprises) are challenged by high costs, a…

“Copyright belongs to whoever pays and commissions the work”: Netizens argue against amendments to Copyright Act

Photographers will soon be granted “default copyright ownership” to the photos that…

竞选期间破坏政党海报 两男遭提控

2020年大选竞选期间,包括前进党、人民行动党都针对选举海报被破坏报警。 据了解,两名男子也因涉嫌破坏竞选海报,在今日被控上庭。 根据《国会选举条例》,任何人损毁或移除竞选海报,都可面对最高监禁一年、罚款1千元或两者兼施的刑罚。他们将在明年1月,再次出庭认罪。 48岁的男子Lim Song Huat,被控在7月3日,在兀兰13街损毁三张人民行动党的竞选海报。另一人则是51岁的Constantine Paul,涉嫌在6月30日,从武吉巴督东5道的路灯,扯下两张前进党海报。

杨莉明:推迟提款政府无利可图 网民要求准时发放公积金

公积金课题与民息息相关,人力部长杨莉明表明,公积金局或政府要求会员推迟领取入息,只是为了让会员享有更多的利息,并非政府有所贪求。此话一出,网民纷纷表示反对,既然政府表示无利可图,就应该在会员满55岁或65岁时,自动发放或者发放50%的金额,让银发一族享受年轻时的收获成果。 但是,杨莉明表示,并不是所有的会员都会在65岁时领取入息。 “截止2017年年底,6成已经达到可领取入息年龄(Payout Eligibility Age,简称PEA)的会员并没有申请入息发放,甚至约一半的70岁会员没有领取入息。” 杨莉明是在2月18日,于国会针对9名议员就公积金退休存款计划(Retirement Sum Scheme,简称RSS)所发出提问时,作出以上回答。 9名议员是就坊间传出有关退休存款计划的会员可领取入息年龄悄悄地从65岁推迟到70岁一事,做出提问。他们分别有林谋泉(蒙巴登区)、方荣发(后港区)和胡美霞(西海岸集选区)等。 公积金局之前曾作出澄清,表示并没有推迟领取入息年龄。 多会员不清楚领款年龄 在2017年的领入息年龄为64岁,而从2018年起,有关年龄已经调整至65岁,且会员最迟必须在70岁开始领取入息。…