The former Progress Singapore Party (PSP) member Mr Daniel Teo who was sacked from the party after admitting to have produced a defamatory video implicating Singapore People’s Party (SPP) chairman Mr Jose Raymond and others, has apologised publicly to Mr Raymond.
On 1 May, a short clip made the rounds online which claimed that the PSP, led by Tan Cheng Bock, has been “infiltrated by foreign proxies”. On that same day, PSP announced that it had expelled Mr Teo after his admission.
Lawyer for Mr Raymond Mr Eugene Thuraisingam from Eugene Thuraisingam LLP had issued the letter of demand on 2 May and had given Mr Teo three days to comply with the terms of the letter of demand which included paying damages and apologising unconditionally for the defamation and damage caused.
On 5 May, through his lawyer, Mr Teo accepted the terms stated in the letter of demand.
Said Mr Raymond’s lawyer Mr Thuraisingam, “A very serious false allegation had been made against Mr Raymond.
It could not go unchallenged. We were instructed by Mr Raymond to take immediate action against Daniel.
“While such a false allegation should never have been made in the first place, we are happy that Daniel has quickly come clean and admitted that the allegation was false and has sincerely apologised for his actions.
Mr Raymond has accepted his apology and has decided not to proceed to claim damages from Daniel, something which he is entitled to by law.”
In his apology which was posted on Facebook on 5 May, Mr Teo said that he admit and acknowledge that the allegations made in his video, are false and completely without foundation and unreservedly withdraw them.

As part of his settlement for the defamation, Mr Teo would need to leave his apology on his Facebook page for a year, and also undertake not to repeat the allegations again.
In lieu of taking out an advertisement to apologise in the Straits Times, Mr Raymond has asked that Mr Teo make a donation to the Straits Times Pocket Money Fund instead.
In a Facebook post, academic Derek da Cunha said the outcome of the legal redress for Mr Raymond was an “excellent outcome”.
“The manner in which this defamation has come to a conclusion ensures that he has acquired the moral and political high ground. It underlines the view that he is in politics to serve others.”
In a Facebook post put up on 6 May, the first time he had commented on the issue, Mr Raymond thanked his legal team for taking
Mr Teo is still under police investigations for the video as Mr Raymond and several others have filed police reports over the matter.

Teo expelled from PSP for defamatory video

According to the message sent by PSP Secretary-General, Dr Tan Cheng Bock to party members on 1 May and seen by TOC, Mr Teo confessed to him about having to commit the offense against the party and a few of its members.
Dr Tan noted that while Mr Teo had offered to resign from the party, the Central Executive Committee has decided unanimously to expel him with immediate effect.
He noted that the party has taken decisive action on this to preempt any rumor or speculation that may be detrimental to the party’s reputation. Noting that while the party values its members, it also expect its members to safeguard the interests of the party.
“Any action that hurts the party’s crediblity cannot and will not be tolerated”, wrote Dr Tan.
In a statement on 4 May, the party noted that the video content did not point to PSP having received foreign funding and that it would like to state categorically that the Party’s funding is in compliance with the Political Donations Act.
The party noted that Teo has made this allegation before to certain members of the Central Executive Committee previously and that no evidence was presented by him.
“Our internal investigations showed no such matters and his allegations were dismissed. We understand that some members of the Party who have been implicated in the video have made their own police reports and have sought legal counsel.” wrote PSP.
It added, “Should anyone wish to make potentially libellous allegations against any member of the party, proper evidence is required. The party does not react to hearsay or rumours”
This is the second incident where the party had to expel its member. It had previously expelled Jan Chan, who was formerly with the National Solidarity Party (NSP) from 2014 to 2019 after he posted an image of the Bible and the Quran with the accompanying caption, “For use during toilet paper shortages”, on the Facebook page of NUS Atheist Society, which he ran. The offensive post went viral leading the police to investigate the matter.

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

IMDA probing into StarHub Internet service disruption during COVID-19 circuit breaker period

On Wednesday (15 April), an investigation into StarHub’s two Internet service disruptions…

【选举】前进党孙俊伟:若执政党横扫93席 12非选区议员无力促成改变

前进党首场线上集会(7月3日),邀请丹戎巴葛集选区前进党候选人一同参与网民的讨论。 询及如何解决新加坡高生活的问题,丹戎巴葛集选区前进党候选人之一哈里仕皮莱(Harish Pillay)回应,前进党将会确保未来五年将不会增长消费税。尽管会有很大的挑战,哈里仕认为,增长消费税将严重影响未来五年的生活。 “并非消费税是罪恶的,虽然非常挑战,但我们想要在未来五年内暂时不增长消费税。” 此外,由于全球经济与疫情的影响,哈里仕也主张在能够暂时取消对基本生活的消费税如电费、水费、天然气等。尽管如今已经在减低各项基本消费,如交通费、土地成本等,但哈里仕认为仍然不足以抵消,人民仍然在高生活成本之下。 观众也提问,前进党秘书长陈清木在人民行动党期间,曾因为哪些课题与人民行动党对着干? 丹戎巴葛集选区前进党候选人之一孙俊伟谈及非选区议员制度,他提醒人民,尽管人民行动党再三强调非选区议员制度的好处,并宣称以在野党角度出发,让在野党也能够加入国会,但国会内仍存在党鞭(Party whip) 党鞭即负责维持议会党团纪律,旨在督导其同政党议员出席及表决行为,是为了确保议员出席并按照政党立场行事。 他也忆述秘书长陈清木在早前,尚未离开人民行动党时,就曾与党鞭(Party whip)对抗。 此外,他也表示,虽然如今的非选区议员议席已达12位,但若执政政府的议席是高达93个,因此非选区议员并未能够作出任何改变。…

EU to Singapore: Reinstate moratorium, abolish death penalty

By Howard Lee The European Union has responded yesterday to the recent…

Timeline of Thai politics as parliament votes for PM

Thailand’s parliament convened for a prime ministerial vote, but frontrunner Pita Limjaroenrat faced obstacles hindering his path to power. This vote is a culmination of two turbulent decades in the nation’s history, marked by political upheaval, coups, protests, and a struggle for democracy. Pita’s chances are slim, as he needs to secure the support of conservative senators who oppose his party’s plans for monarchy reform, while also dealing with legal cases against him and his party.