As the international media continues to cover Singapore’s fall from grace in relation to its management of the COVID-19 pandemic, Minister for Manpower, Josephine Teo has been quoted by the BBC as saying the following:

There are in Southeast Asia alone about 10 million migrant workers. A fraction of them in Singapore. We’re not perfect but we do what we can….Yes, we took some safe distancing measures within the dormitories and if we were to be able to rewind the clock, one could say that these safe distancing measures needed to go much further.”

The question that remains to be answered is – Have they really done what they can? Given that the first case in a dormitory was reported in the first half of February and no action was taken – a case could be made that they have definitely not done all they can.
Anyone that does not know that our migrant workers live in very close proximity with each other is wilfully blind. Surely the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (Teo’s domain) must have known how they live? It is also common sense that viruses transmit through proximity. Put two and two together, have the government really done all they can?
The constant stream of instructions and regulations coming hard and fast have also led some to comment that our government policies have not displayed foresight or been proactive. Rather, they have seemed knee jerked, reactive and somewhat hap hazard.
Based on the Facebook post of a migrant worker employer, it would appear that even the best efforts of a responsible employer are being hampered by the seemingly bipolar actions of the MOM.
In a heartfelt and frustrated post, Benjamin Lin cited an example of how his attempts to rehouse his workers in a bid to stop the spread of the virus were thwarted by the ever changing policies of the MOM without regard for logistical realities.
This does not appear to be a sign of a ministry that has the situation under control. Perhaps, they need to pause, observe and strategise before appearing to issue ever changing directives a mile a minute?
From a longer term perspective and perhaps to prevent future knee jerk reactions, the MOM may need to relook the entire system that governs how we treat and regard our migrant workers.
In the same article, the BBC  commented that the poor living condition in worker dormitories is a systemic problem that won’t change until the entire system does.
It further stated that “the pandemic has brought to the surface the flaws in Singapore’s society and it was the failure to address these cracks that now threatens even their best laid plan,”
A long term view may go a long way to alleviate future risks from being caught off guard.

Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

林志蔚会见人民活动至深夜 结束后续赴居民丧礼

盛港集选区议员林志蔚,举办首次会见人民活动,聆听人民心声直到深夜。结束后仍出席一名居民丧礼,往生者家属对林的慰问也留言致谢。 盛港集选区议员林志蔚昨日(8日)在脸书表示,盛港安谷(Anchorvale)和河谷(Rivervale)首次办会见人民活动,共有50名居民参与,除了日常的安全防疫措施以外,林志蔚也叙述,当时会见居民的情况。 他也指出,居民除了期许他们能够传达民意到相关政府机构,也希望能调解民生议题和邻里纠纷,聆听居民的心声。 林志蔚称会见居民一直持续到凌晨,林志蔚感恩表示,谢谢志愿者能够协助至深夜。 除了获得网友的一致赞赏,也让其他选区居民感到羡慕。有当地居民分享,活动确实一直持续到凌晨一点左右。 值得关注的是,林志蔚在活动结束后,仍出席居民的丧礼。尽管林志蔚低调行事,但往生者的丈夫仍感谢林志蔚的关心,并在脸书留言致谢。  

Netizens ask Minister Masagos Zulkifli not to claim credit for new tudung policy, highlight his earlier stance against it

The Malay-Muslim community’s “hearts are full today” following the announcement that public…

A scrutiny of Ng Kok Song’s self-professed independence in the upcoming presidential race

Opinion: Despite president aspirant Ng Kok Song’s assertions of his independence, his ties to PAP-linked entities and overlaps with former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s career cast doubts on his political neutrality. Is his candidacy a sincere bid or a strategic move to prevent a shameful walkover?

Mothers question MOE's policy of withholding PSLE results; donors ask why there is an underclass in Singapore

Something is “very seriously wrong” about the Ministry of Education (MOE) policy…