Former Executive Director and CEO, Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd, Ho Ching, speaking at the Global Compact Network Singapore Summit 2019 on 12 November. (Image from Temasek)

The Minister of Finance has instructed the POFMA Office to issue four correction directions under the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) relating to posts made about the salary of Temasek Holding’s CEO Ho Ching, who is also the wife of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.
In a statement on Sunday (19 April), the POFMA office said that the instructions from the Minister of Finance were to issue correction directions to HardwareZone user ‘darkseidluv’, The Temasek Review’s Facebook page, The Online Citizen’s Facebook page and website and Mr Lim Tean for sharing this falsehood on his Facebook page.
The correction order noted that is the opinion of the Finance Minister that it is in the public interest to issue these directions.
However, while the correction notice made references to social media posts made on the subject on Facebook and HardwareZone Forum, it did not identify the Taiwan news outlet that made the initial claim as the source of the alleged false claim. Media query to the POFMA office has not been responded.
HardwareZone has made a correction on the post in question by its user, noting that the post contains falsehoods and included a link to the government’s clarification of the facts.
For TOC, the correction direction is for an article on the website, a Facebook post which links to the article on TOC’s site, and Facebook video post of the Taiwanese news show which made the claim. TOC has similarly complied with the correction directions.
The two other have not included the correction notice in their posts at the time of publication.
Additionally, as noted in a separate Facebook post yesterday, TOC has filed its application to cancel the correction direction to the Minister at 7pm and is awaiting a reply.

Government asserts that the claim is false

On the government’s website Gov.sg, a post on the correction said that “there were false statements of fact contained in a number of social media posts” about the annual salary of Ho Ching.
The website noted, “The Authors made various claims that the annual salary of Temasek CEO Ms Ho Ching is ‘NT$ 2.1 billion’, ‘about 100 million SGD’ or ‘S$99 million a year’.”
It asserted that these claims are “false”, referring to a statement on the Temasek Holdings website published on Sunday as well.
The state-owned investment management firm denied claims that its CEO Ho Ching earns an annual salary of S$99 million. Though it rarely ever addressed the matter of remuneration of its top management, this time Temasek addressed the claims of Ho Ching’s salary directly, merely saying that the claim is “false”. Temasek also noted that Ho Ching’s annual compensation is not the highest within the firm nor is she among the top five highest paid executives.
Gov.sg also provided additional clarifications on the matter, saying that “the Government does not set the remuneration of staff in Temasek; this is the responsibility of its Board and management”.
It continued, “In the case of Temasek, its Board Committee, the Leadership Development and Compensation Committee (‘LDCC’), is responsible for the establishment of guidelines and policies on performance measurement and compensation plans.”
The site noted that the remuneration of the Executive Directors of Temasek Holdings is approved by LDCC and endorsed by its Board.
Highlighting that Temasek’s remuneration framework “balances reward for short-term performance and long-term value creation”, the site added that the company’s compensation framework is “benchmarked to the industry and the compensation framework comprises a base salary, as well as short-term, medium-term, and long-term incentives”.
It added, “Temasek has also publicly stated that Ms Ho Ching’s annual compensation is neither the highest within Temasek, nor is she amongst the top five highest paid executives in Temasek.“

Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

德光岛部分地区自来水变色 启用替代水源

根据新加坡国防部今日(21日)发布的文告,指德光岛基本军事训练中心(BMT)部分地区的自来水,在昨早出现变色水源。 不过,当局已就此事联系公用事业局(PUB),后者立即采取行动,冲洗德光岛的水供网络,并收集了自来水样本调查。至于何以有变色自来水,仍在调查中。 国防部称,当局看重服役人员的健康和福祉,因此公用事业局派出水车,加上军训中心的资源以满足服役人员重要的食水和准备食材需求。 目前军训中心与公用事业局,正合力恢复岛上自来水供应。

Character assassination of the most uncharitable kind

Therapist Anthony Yeo responds to the Straits Times’ article on Chee Soon Juan

马国国会再通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》

马来西亚国会下议院再次通过废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。 根据《东方日报》报导,马国会下议院以记名投票的方式,最终以92票支持51票反对,三读通过《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2018年反假新闻法令》是在2018年4月2日,由国阵政府提呈并获得通过。希盟政府上任后提呈废除法案,虽然在去年8月16日下议院三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 《2019年反假新闻(废除)法案》是由首相署部长拿督刘伟强提呈。 反对党国会议员在辩论环节时,仍全力支持必须保留《2018年反假新闻法令》。 希望联盟执政后,兑现希盟宣言里的承诺,废除《2018年反假新闻法令》。而国会下议院在去年8月16日,三读通过《2018年反假新闻(废除)法案》。 惟该法案再被带往上议院时,却在去年的9月12日,被上议院以28对21票驳回,以致《2018年反假新闻法令》废除不成。 至于马来西亚为何要废除《反假新闻法令》,要回到去年希盟政府开始执政后,声称现有法律已足够应对假消息传播的问题,例如1998年通讯与多媒体法等。 马国首相马哈迪表示,如果制定法律限制人们表达意见,恐怕亦可能遭政府滥用。 该法曾在去年提出废除,但遭马国上议院否决。  

【选举】李显龙称此次选举与李家纠纷无关

行动党秘书长李显龙称,弟弟参与前进党是公民的权利,本届选举也与李家纠纷无关,而是关乎新加坡的未来。 在今日(29日)的线上记者会,李显龙回应《联合早报》提问,对于弟弟加入前进党有何看法。对此李显龙称,此次选举无关涉及他和弟弟的家庭纠纷。 昨日李显扬就已对媒体表示,入党前就已自由发表言论,没理由为了讨论家庭纠纷入党。前进党秘书长陈清木也强调,了解显扬入党,乃是因为后者相信该党理念,也懂得把政治和个人意图分开。 本月24日,陈清木正式移交党员证给李显扬。他当时表示,李显扬是已故李光耀之子,而自己也曾与李光耀共事,李光耀坚持自己的原则,相信两人都看到当前执政党的问题,再者李显扬也支持前进党理念。 李显扬过去就已表态全力支持前进党,也曾指出“今时今日的人民行动党,已不再是我父亲领导时期的行动党。它已经迷失了方向。”(Today’s PAP is no longer the PAP of…