When the Government uses or don’t use the funds in the Reserves, all MPs and the public should be cognisant of the trade-offs and support to the ruling Government at that time extends to citizens, Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh said in a Facebook post on Wednesday (8 April).
“Whenever the reserves are spent (or not spent), all MPs and the public have to be cognisant of the trade-offs and extent of support any Government of the day, not just a PAP Government, can (or should) extend to Singaporeans,” Mr Singh wrote.
He added that in the present-day situation, non-government MPs do not have any clear idea of the spending of the Reserves and they can only take the current ruling party (PAP) or any future Government’s word for it.
In the post, the opposition leader cited an article by The Business Times which highlighted the lack of data given out on the Reserves which limits discussions on its use.
One of the points mentioned in the article by OCBC economist Selena Ling was that Singapore doesn’t have to announce to the world how much money it has in its Reserves. However, she suggested that the Reserves should be split into two parts – one portion to be utilised as “a base for generating the net investment returns contribution, and which can be publicly disclosed.”
As for the remaining part, it can be kept as a secret in order to “deter currency speculators from attacking the Singapore dollar.”
In reference to this, Mr Singh said that this is a suggestion that his party had enunciated in Parliament before.
He went on further to state that it’s normal for anyone in power to feel “uncomfortable and hesitate” to reveal such information as it will bring more public scrutiny.
“There can be good reasons for withholding such information, and some very questionable reasons for doing so,” he said.
He added, “Over the last few years and on the reserves in particular, the public conversation has moved forward, far beyond ‘ask no questions’ attitude, reminiscent of closed political systems.”
However, when Mr Singh asked the Minister of Finance Heng Swee Keat last year in Parliament on why the Government Financial Statements were not published online, Mr Heng replied that the Ministry pulls out relevant information and make them public in documents related to the Budget in order to make it easier for the public to understand.
If that’s not all, Mr Heng also added that his Ministry “will continue to review and update the various methods in which we release and publish information on Government accounts.”
In contrast to Mr Heng’s reply, Mr Singh noted that every Town Council and statutory board’s financial statements can be viewed online. As such, he said that the Government’s financial statement should also be published online as well.
“There are many aspects of state expenditure that are revealed in the financial statements. For e.g. how much was spent on land reclamation on Pulau Tekong, the cost of land acquisition for development, the amount spent on police camera projects etc,” the politician wrote.
If that’s not all, Mr Singh also pointed out that a responsible opposition should play a role in the country’s parliamentary democracy and governance.
“A responsible opposition is not a pliant opposition – it must play a role in Singapore’s parliamentary democracy and governance. Like asking how much money is earned by those who invest and protect our reserves – and who are ultimately paid by the taxpayer – is also not out of the ordinary in any developed country,” he explained.
He added, “This was a question asked by Mr Png Eng Huat in Parliament recently. The answer? Let’s not focus on one or two expense items.”
Having said that, Mr Singh said that Singapore can do better in informing the funds in the Reserves to all people in the country.
“And as the suggestion in the BT (Business Times) article above conveys, there is definitely scope to do better, not just on the reserves but a whole host of finance-related matters,” he added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

First quadruple amputee to climb Kilimanjaro and Aconcagua

Kyle Maynard is a man who doesn’t know the word ‘impossible’. He…

指占过半议席 拥组政府权力 泰七政党组“民主阵线”联盟

遭前首相他信指控有“操纵之嫌”、军政府“严重干涉”篡改的大选之后,泰国七政党声称,尽管是非正式的,只要他们联盟,就拥有超过一半以上的下议院议席,具有组织政府的权力。 根据彭博社报导指出,亲他信的为泰党领袖苏达拉(Sudarat Keyuraphan)于星期三(27日)宣布七个政党可以组成联盟,至少拿下500个下议院议席中的255席。 七个政党分别有为泰党、未来前进党、泰国自由党(Seri Ruam Thai)、国家党(Prachachart)、新经济党(New Economy)、为国党(Pheu Chart)和泰国人民力量党(Palang Puangchon Thai)。 也是为泰党首相候选人的苏达拉指出,“很显然的,反军人执政的民主阵线,在此次选举中获得人民授予组阁权。” 《南华早报》引述她的话说,“虽然还会有更多政党加入‘民主阵线’,但是我们可以肯定已经取得255个议席。我们宣称,反对军事统治的‘民主阵线’取得多数议席”。…

乌节豪杰大厦命案:两名被告转为共谋蓄意伤人 一人面对谋杀控状

乌节豪杰大厦命案,再有两名被控嫌犯,26岁的陈云胜和洪大源,控状改为共谋蓄意伤人,目前只有陈显扬仍面对谋杀控状。(部分人名译音) 该起命案发生于去年7月2日,发生在乌节豪杰大厦里,死者是31岁的沙迪斯(Satheesh Noel s/o Gobidass)。 死者当时在二楼夜店疑似和被告们起冲突,遭他们围攻,颈部中刀后逃跑,却最终重伤倒在商场门口,随后被送往陈笃生医院急救,却因伤势太重而回天乏术。 警方于12小时内将七人逮捕归案,分别是陈云胜、陈家兴(26岁)、洪大源、萧玉珍(22岁)、陈显扬、卢文聪(25岁)以及陈洪成(22岁)共6男1女在谋杀罪名下被控。 陈云胜和洪大源被指涉及对沙迪拳打脚踢。洪大源的案子将展延到下月的审前会议,控方或对他提出进一步指控。 若罪成,陈云胜和洪大源可被判最高两年监禁、最高罚款5千元或两者兼施。 这意味着其中六人的控状已减轻,只有陈显扬面对谋杀指控。他被指当天携带了一把可折叠的弯刀。 若谋杀罪名成立,被告可能面对死刑,而在公共场所持有攻击性武器者,则将可能面对不超过三年的监刑,和不少于六下的鞭刑。

40-year-old arrested for posting comments that incite violence

The Police announced through its Facebook fanpage that it has arrested a 40-year-old Singaporean…