Photo: scmp.com

As the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic worsens, the more than 8,000 multinational firms in Singapore may receive directives pertaining to retrenchments from their global headquarters.

However, Alexander Melchers, who is a council member of Singaporean-German Chamber of Industry and Commerce (SGC), advised that these Singapore company branches could notify headquarters of other cost-minimising measures that can be implemented to preserve its workforce in the country, made possible by the collaboration between the Government, unions, and company.

“It is crucial for the management here to communicate to their headquarters that in Singapore, we take a very different and tripartite approach. In fact, many in Europe and America look to Singapore and even talk about ‘Singapore-ising’ their approach… These circumstances call for employers to act quickly, but in a responsible and humanitarian way to sustain our businesses,” said Mr Melchers at a media conference on Monday (30 March).

According to Peter Seah, who is the Chairman of the National Wages Council (NWC), DBS, and Singapore Airlines, the core principle of the tripartite movement is that all parties should always act responsibly.

When asked about whether some firms may take advantage of the cost-reducing guidelines set by NWC even if they are not impacted by COVID-19, Mr Seah replied, “We certainly would not condone any parties acting irresponsibly and weakening therefore this tripartite partnership and friendship.”

Workers are discerning and they know well the performance of the company, as remarked by Mary Liew, who is the President of the National Trades Union Congress.

Ms Liew added, “It is important that during this time, employers step forward and also show their appreciation and work closely together with workers and also reward them fairly and accordingly as well… When the economy turns around, they will need the workers as well to continue on with their journey.”

She also advised workers to attend training and to accept new job roles and flexible work schedules, as well as accepting lower salary if that will get the firm to retain them.

In 2003, amid worries about Singapore’s cost competitiveness, the contribution rates of the Central Provident Fund (CPF) was slashed in order to cut wage costs. The NWC had considered whether to suggest such a move this time also.

According to Aubeck Kam, who is the Permanent Secretary for Manpower, the Government felt that a cut to the rate is not needed because the employer CPF contribution rates of up to 17 per cent were much less than the 25 per cent wage subsidy in the enhanced Jobs Support Scheme announced in the past week.

The President of the Singapore National Employers Federation, Robert Yap concurred that the Resilience Budget “helped to solve many, many issues” whereas CPF savings aid employees to pay for their mortgage loans, Ms Liew added.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

工党党魁罕见受邀国大毕业礼 毕业生:展示新加坡民主成熟度

工人党秘书长毕丹星,于昨日(19日)首要出席新加坡国立大学第22长毕业典礼,并致词分享学习历程。这也是本地反对党领袖少有的机会,受邀出席国立大学毕业礼活动。 国大是毕丹星的母校,他是在2000年从这里毕业。他坦言,自己不是全A状元,也是在教育体系下力争上游,努力克服各种障碍。 “我小学毕业考考得不太好,进入普通源流中学,上初级学院和大学也是一路跌跌撞撞。“他在1999年获得海峡汽船奖学金,能被国大文学暨社会科学院录取,就读政治与历史系,感觉像中了彩票一样。 也是阿裕尼集选区国会议员的毕丹星,勉励现场470名文学暨社科院毕业生,即便曾经学习有不理想的时候,但是也不要轻言放弃。 他说,他在国大和服役的经验,改变了自己对学习的态度,“当中也许你们在经历了国大的求学生涯后,会感觉过去你们应该更加努力。” 毕丹星补充,踏出校门,就不能只依靠一纸文凭,还有个人态度,职业道德和勤勉在职场也很重要。他劝勉表现好点莫要因文凭尔兹曼,反之要精益求精,追求卓越。 “当你往上爬时,记得善待他人,因为有天你往下走,可能也会遇到他们。“毕丹星的待人哲理,赢得台下掌声。 32岁的政治科学毕业生代表瓦利德,在致词时不忘赞许今年的毕业礼较不同,因为反对党领袖获得邀请,显示民主政治发展趋向成熟。 同时出席毕业礼的嘉宾,尚包括卫生、环境与水源高级政务部长许连碹博士和人民行动党丹绒巴葛集选区国会议员谢世儒。

Trade off for growth not at expense of Singaporeans: SPP on PM’s National Day Rally speech

National growth should not be done at the expense of jobs for…

Primary 2 Chinese Textbook described late LKY as ‘the Great Gardener’ who build the nation

Facebook page Singaporean Diary on Merlion Island (獅子島上: 新加坡人生活日記) shared a photo…

港高庭判《禁蒙面法》违宪

上月4日,香港特首林郑月娥宣布引用《紧急情况规例条例》通过《禁止蒙面规例》 ;任何人身处受规管的公众集会或公众游行,或非法集结(包括暴动)或未经批准的集结时,使用可能隐藏身份的蒙面物品,即属犯罪。 不过,香港高等法院在今日(18日)却裁定,港府上述紧急法在“危害公安”的情况下使用,属违反《基本法》,而《禁蒙面法》对基本权利限制超乎合理需要,亦属违宪。 据了解有24名泛民议员和前议员梁国雄(“长毛”)向法庭提出司法复核,他们指《紧急法》绕过香港立法会,赋予特首不受约束的立法权力,有违《基本法》。 针对《禁蒙面法》,他们质疑为何涵盖和平集会,且此法反而会激起更多抗议示威,遏制成效有限。 港府代表则说,《紧急法》没有与《基本法》条文相抵触,并称港府设“禁蒙面法”,为的是“拯救年轻人及香港市民”。 不过,在本周三法庭将聆审诉辩双方陈词,以商讨补救裁决所引发的情况。 港府颁《禁蒙面法》冲突仍持续 在上月4日,林郑月娥指示威者在使用暴力时几乎以蒙面形式进行,目的是为了隐藏身份、逃避行责。 他相信反蒙面发有效阻止激进分子违法,并有助于警方执法。 然而此举反而引来香港民间更激烈反弹,10月初香港多区仍有大型示威活动。仍有港民蒙面上街。