In a joint statement earlier today (20 March), the Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), together with the Solidarity for ASEAN Peoples’ Advocacy and the undersigned organisations, expressed grave concerns with the lack of a human rights focus in the current response to the ongoing COVID‐19 pandemic by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Members States.

As such, they call upon ASEAN Member States to place human rights and dignity as the core principles in addressing the pandemic, specifically by ensuring that any public health measures are taken in alignment with international human rights law and standards to ensure accountability and transparency in the handling of the situation.

They noted that is alarming that many ASEAN Member States have yet to adopt a clear communications strategy to inform the public on the situation, three months after the COVID‐19 outbreak. This notion was made following observation that ASEAN countries such as Indonesia, Myanmar, Laos, and the Philippines have delayed or limit the release of information to preserve their image.

Besides that, Myanmar, Thailand, and Singapore are actively use repressive laws such as national anti‐fake news laws to pursue misinformation, although this ultimately failed to quell public fear or doubt. According to the statement, this high‐handed approach risks public health and welfare, particularly for those with limited access to information and education. It mutes peoples’ legitimate expressions of doubt and query on the actual situation in their country and inspires more speculation and misinformation on the COVID‐19 situation in‐country.

Meanwhile, in Indonesia, President Joko Widodo initially encouraged international and local travel by providing
incentives for local tourism, while later admitting that the Government intentionally hid information related to the areas that are contacted with COVID‐19 amidst fear of public uproar.

This lack of transparency from the Indonesia’s Health Ministry and its Government is also documented in the Philippines. Both the Governments of Singapore and Myanmar have expressed the intention to impose their anti‐fake news provisions in their laws to control the information.

In Thailand, amidst public concern over the actual number of confirmed COVID‐19 cases, the authorities implied that presenting false information online related to COVID‐19 could fall under the offense of the Computer Crime Act.

More worryingly, no cases have yet to be reported from Laos and Myanmar, raising serious concerns about lack of testing or reporting, and consequent lack of pandemic preparedness.

As several countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, and Indonesia have tightened border controls and imposed forms of lock‐downs, FORUM-ASIA and many other NGOs are increasingly concerned that governments may use excessive force, militarisation, or other abuses of power in implementing these measures.

This becomes particularly concerning as uniformed forces are deployed without adequate training and due oversight when implementing these heightened control measures and the fact that most of ASEAN member states have authoritarian or partial‐democracy governments.

For example, in the Philippines on 15 March 2020, on the first day of the quarantine in Metro Manila, several individuals reported corruption and intimidation by the police. The expansion of quarantine to an ‘enhanced community quarantine’ level throughout Luzon, the largest and most populous island in the Philippines, also poses concern as access to transportation, food security, and essential healthcare facilities will be heavily restricted.

Meanwhile, the Government of Indonesia deployed its National Intelligence Agency to help monitor the situation, instead of relying on medical experts.

“Without an independent body to conduct monitoring and coordination of and among governmental bodies, potential violations and abuses of human rights including the right to access to healthcare, right to freedom of movement, right to personal security, right to privacy, and right to non‐penalisation for lack of documentation, is high,” said the NGOs in their statement.

“We are further concerned with the lack of preparedness and the inadequacy of healthcare systems and facilities in the region to address the COVID‐19 situation,” they added.

Despite governments’ insistence that their health protocols have met the World Health Organisation standards, sufficient access to testing and treatment as well as protection equipment are often only available in major hospitals in major cities in the region, without realistic solutions provided for the rest.

This situation threatens healthcare and social workers, who are at the frontline of the battle, as they are left vulnerable with a high risk of contamination due to the lack of protection protocols and safety equipment.

Additionally, the NGO also highlighted how the pandemic response further reinforces existing inequalities faced by vulnerable populations, particularly informal workers, migrant workers, as well as rural, elderly, indigenous, LGBTIQ, people with disabilities, and refugee communities. Refugees and other underground populations face unique vulnerabilities linked to risks posed by engaging authorities.

Mitigating these risks will be critical to stemming COVID‐19 spread. Meanwhile, women and girls are experiencing challenges as the burden to conduct unpaid care work for their family members, especially the sick, increases. Furthermore, incidents of domestic and intimate partner violence can likely increase during strict quarantines while services and facilities that aim at addressing domestic and gender‐based violence are disrupted due to COVID‐19 response procedure.

About 70% ASEAN’s workforce come from the informal sector, including part‐time informal workers, and workers in the ‘gig’ economy. Many are daily wage earners and/or coming from marginalised communities. These workers will have their livelihood severely affected from pandemic response measures.

Hence, states must provide a social protection net that mitigates the impact on all of those affected by the COVID‐19 pandemic without exception and without discrimination.

“They should also implement measures such as the universal work from home and covered‐leave policy, as well as contingency and compensation during the quarantine”, remarked the NGOs, while criticising businesses that still demand staff to report physically to work despite known risks or by imposing unpaid leave for several months.

Ultimately, the NGOs, in their statement, reiterated the importance of human rights and dignity as core principles in combating this global pandemic.

They noted with disappointment that these principles are not underscored in the commitment of ASEAN health sectors to further review and assess the enhanced cooperation in regional preparedness, response strategies, and countermeasures by utilising the ASEAN Plus Three Health Cooperation.

It is further disappointing to see that the disparate display of measures by the individual ASEAN Member States showed the lack of a coherent and coordinated ASEAN approach in managing the impact of the pandemic to the region.

Therefore, the NGOs call upon ASEAN Member States to practise the following measures:

  • Respect human rights, fundamental freedoms, and human dignity as well as to abide with international human rights standards and principles when implementing measures to address the COVID‐19 pandemic
  • Provide free and high quality tests, treatment, and care to all people affected by the pandemic, including marginalized groups and undocumented populations
  • Provide temporary and safe shelter during enforced quarantines for the homeless and other vulnerable communities
  • Facilitate regular and transparent access to accurate, timely, and comprehensive information to the public regarding the disease, including the risk of transmission, prevention, and governmental efforts to address the situation
  • Ensure that all employers, including public institutions and private companies and businesses, provide adequate compensation to all employees affected by the pandemic
  • Generate a timely response accessible to all people, including those who have limited access to healthcare facilities
  • Provide holistic measures, through law, policy, and practice, to uphold and ensure workers’ and migrant workers’ rights, welfare, safety, and security, regardless of legal status, in response to the COVID‐19 threat
  • Encourage all national human rights institutions to monitor the human rights impact their State’s measures together with civil society
  • Ensure that full access to social and protection mechanisms, including access to justice for women and girls must not cease at this time of quarantines.
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】9月25日起 客工宿舍增额外检测

人力部和卫生部联手,从9月25日开始,为回利阁客工宿舍(Toh Guan Dormitory)的客工进行为期四周的冠病检测。 据人力部文告指出,了解客工们的身体状况,并且尽早发现客工群体中的无症状感染者,所以展开更频密的检测行动。 当局表示,如果能够更早发现新病例,就不需要当宿舍出现新病例时将整个宿舍楼隔离期开,甚至还可以实施针对性隔离措施,以防影响没被感染的客工和雇主。 然而为了尽量避免影响客工的工作和生活作息,有关的实验性检测将在客工宿舍进行,且采用新的口咽拭子检测。 住在回利阁客工宿舍的客工们原定每14天就要进行一次冠病例行监测,而随着人力部增加的这次额外检测,客工们平均每七天就要接受一次检测。

未优先考量本地雇员 一千家公司被列入观察名单

昨日,人力部长杨莉明在国会表示,本地有1000家公司因为聘雇时没优先考虑新加坡籍员工,在公平考量框架(,Fair Consideration Framework,FCF)下被列入黑名单。 她指出,自从公平考量框架观察名单在2016年推出以来,人力部已拒绝多达3千份就业准证申请,一些则是雇主本身取消。 与此同时,在上述观察名单企业,招聘的新加坡籍PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师),逾4千400人。 今年初,杨莉明称在新近更新的公平考量框架下,若有雇主在雇佣雇员时未公平考量或歧视本地雇主,将面对更严重惩处。 自年初更新以来,共23名雇主因不公平雇用方式受对付。 不过,仍有求职者反映,当局设立的“职业库”(Jobs Bank)“形同虚设”,一些雇主用迂回的方式,考量聘用外籍人士的案例仍存在。 就在两个月前,一家物流公司为外籍员工申请就业准证(EP,即Employment Pass),却谎称已先面试了两名本地人,结果面控。 先斩后奏?…

【选举】即时:李显龙已建议总统解散国会

我国总理李显龙,于今日(6月23日)下午4时发表全国广播。他指已会见总统哈莉玛,并建议申请解散国会,颁布选举令。 他在广播中解释为何目前需需要解散国会,也指现任政府五年任期已结束。 根据今年三月份选区范围检讨委会报告,国会议席从原有的89增至93席,共31个选区,其中集选区17个,单选区14个。 早前选举局也指出,依循卫生部指南,来届选举将无法举办群众大会,而改以线上群众大会。同时,政党拜访一组人不得超过五人,各组人员也不得接触,需遵守一米安全距离。

贸工部预估明年经济增长0.5至2.5巴仙

上月14日,贸工部公布对新加坡第三季经济的初步预估数据,整体国内生产总值(GDP)增长仅0.1巴仙,与第二季度持平。 不过今日该部公布较乐观的GDP预估增长,2019年约为0.5至1巴仙,以及明年为0.5至2.5巴仙。 贸工部称我国经济在第三季度的同比增长达到0.5巴仙,比之前预估的0.1巴仙高。 经季节性调整按环比折年率计算,经济增长2.1巴仙,而第二季度则是负增长2.7巴仙。 制造业受到电子产品影响同比滑落1.7巴仙,惟其他制造领域增长,如生物医学制造领域增长最强劲。 建筑业在公共与私人领域带动下同比增长2.9巴仙;零售领域萎缩3.3巴仙,主要是因为机械、设备和供应等领域,因为电子出口表现而下滑。 至于运输和仓储领域增长持平,比此前2.4巴仙的增长放缓。空运领域则基于空航搭客增长稳健成长。 贸工部预测明年温和增长 贸工部预测2020年,由于新兴市场和发展中经济体增长前景的改善,预计全球增长将出现温和回升。不过新加坡数个关键需求市场,如美国和中国预料仍会放缓。 亚洲方面,中国明年增长预计减速,基于该国进行金融改革以打击影子银行活动,而美国关税仍会对中国出口构成压力;香港等地的地缘性不确定因素亦对周边和新加坡等地溢出负面影响。 该部预测整体上新加坡在明年能取得“温和增长”,特别是电子和精密工程领域有望逐步复苏、数码工艺、金融和保险业务保持健康增长。